Soft Tissue Augmentation Around Immediate Implants In The Esthetic Zone

NCT ID: NCT03802370

Last Updated: 2019-01-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

10 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-02-01

Study Completion Date

2020-02-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Following tooth loss, a considerable reduction in hard- and soft-tissue volume can be expected (Tan WL, et al., 2012), (AraujoMG, et al., 2015). In the anterior maxilla, tissue loss can make future implant restorations more challenging and less predictable in terms of achieving and maintaining favorable soft-tissue-emergence profiles. Even with careful implant planning and placement, marginal gingival recession of 0.5-1 mm has been a common finding with single-tooth implants (Nisapakultorn K, et al., 2010), (Suphanantachat S, et al., 2012). This is partly attributed to bone remodeling after implant surgery, and occurs regardless of implant-placement protocol used (Hof M, et al., 2015).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The dome technique addresses the placement of the CT, as it is layered over the implant and takes the shape of an inverted dome. The advantage of the dome CT technique is that it allows for both buccal and coronal augmentation of local soft tissue, while maximizing blood supply to the area by using tunneling-technique principles. It enhances and augments the peri-implant tissue foundation for a favorable facial and interproximal restorative emergence profile. As this technique does not involve raising an independent buccal flap, the gingival tissue of the adjacent teeth is not compromised, and thus the risk of recession and formation of black triangles on the adjacent teeth is minimized.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Recession, Gingival

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

single arm groups
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

single am

single arm , superiority trial , tunneling technique in connective tissue graft around dental implants

Group Type OTHER

connective tissue grafting by Dome Technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The dome technique addresses the placement of the CT, as it is layered over the implant and takes the shape of an inverted dome

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

connective tissue grafting by Dome Technique

The dome technique addresses the placement of the CT, as it is layered over the implant and takes the shape of an inverted dome

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Dome technique

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with healthy systemic condition
* Patients aged from 20 to 45 years old Availability of bone apical and palatal to the socket to provide primary stability.
* Presence of adequate gingival architecture with the surrounding dentition
* Patient provides an informed consent
* Adequate Inter-arch space for implant placement
* Favorable occlusion (no traumatic occlusion)
* Good oral hygiene
* Accepts 6-month follow-up period

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest
* Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as para-functional habits
* Current and former smokers
* Pregnant females
* HIV or Hepatitis; 5/Physical handicaps that would interfere with the ability to perform adequate oral hygiene
* Alcoholism or chronic drug abuse; 7/ Heavy smokers \>10/cigarettes per day
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

45 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cairo University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Yasmine Abbas Elsayed

professor: Mona Shoeib , associated professor: Enji ahmed mahmoud

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Irinakis T, Aldahlawi S. The dome technique: a new surgical technique to enhance soft-tissue margins and emergence profiles around implants placed in the esthetic zone. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 Feb 14;10:1-7. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S154152. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29491722 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CEBD-CU-2019-01-10

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.