Safety and Efficacy of the Gastric Reactance (XL) in Patients Post-operated of Elective Cardiac Surgery

NCT ID: NCT03799133

Last Updated: 2020-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

38 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-26

Study Completion Date

2019-12-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the XL trend measured by Florence (Critical Perfusion Inc, Palo Alto, California) in the prediction of morbimortality of Mexican patients post-operated of elective cardiovascular surgery.

Hypothesis: 1. The gastric reactance measurement (XL) correlates with the morbimortality (postoperatory shock, excessive bleeding, vasoplegic syndrome and death) and with the risk predictors (APACHE II, STS, SOFA, and EUROSCORE II) with patients post-operated of elective cardiac surgery. 2. It is possible to identify the cut-off point of the values of the gastric reactance (XL) as a predictive tool of morbimortality in patients post-operated of elective cardiac surgery. 3. The gastric reactance (XL) is a safe measurement to patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A maximum of 35 patients with age greater or equal to 18 years with elective surgery (valvular surgery, revascularization, or a combination of both) that comply with the inclusion/exclusion criteria of this protocol will be enrolled.

Investigational device: Florence (Gastric Impedance Spectrometer System or ISMO). Comparative with Risk scales SOFA, APACHE II, STS, Euroscore II, hemodynamic variables, lactate and mixed venous saturation.

The Florence catheter will be placed at the beginning of the surgery and up to 72 hours in ICU.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cardiac Failure Ventricular Dysfunction Valvular Heart Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Eligible patients will be placed the Florence catheter.
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with Florence device

Patients with the Florence catheter placed and connected to the Florence monitor to measure XL trend.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Florence device

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Florence catheter will be placed at the beginning of the surgery and up to 72 hours in ICU.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Florence device

The Florence catheter will be placed at the beginning of the surgery and up to 72 hours in ICU.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ISMO Gastric Impedance Spectrometer System

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Women and men within an age equal or greater than 18 years old.
* Subjects scheduled to an elective cardiac surgery for valvular surgery, revascularization or a combination of both.
* Subjects compliant with the indication to be placed a floating pulmonary artery catheter.
* Marks results previous to surgery: STS mortality risk equal or greater than 6% of the day before or Euro Score II with a mortality risk equal or greater than 6% or left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF/FEVI) less than 45% (patients with cardiac failure or right ventricle dysfunction or a combination of both), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) less than 17 mm, peak systolic velocity of tricuspid lateral ring measured by Tissue Doppler (LVOT/TSVI) less than 0.1 m/s; patient with elective surgery of: aortic and mitral valve replacement or aortic and mitral valve replacement + tricuspid valve plasty or aortic valve replacement + mitral valve plasty or mitral valve replacement + tricuspid valve plasty or aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve replacement or aortic valve replacement + tricuspid valve plasty or double valve replacement (any combination) + revascularization or aortic valve replacement + revascularization + mitral valve plasty.
* Subject is not enrolled in another investigational protocol.
* Informed consent has been signed of acceptance by the subject before study procedures.
* Subject in sinus rhythm before surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Subjects with records of recent digestive tube bleeding (last 30 days).
* Paraplegic or hemiplegic subjects.
* Subjects with congenital background (interauricular communication, ventricular atrial channel, coarctation of the aorta, persistent arterial duct, pulmonary stenosis, ventricular septal defect, tetralogy of fallot, total or partial anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, transposition of the great vessels, tricuspid atresia, arterial trunk, etc).
* Maxillofacial malformation.
* Catheter placement failure.
* Known pregnancy or discovered pregnancy after admission (before surgery).
* Woman in breastfeeding period.
* Subjects not compliant with clinical indication of nasogastric catheter placement or contraindicated to place a nasogastric catheter.
* Subjects with an implanted pacemaker or permanent defibrillator.
* Medication supply that impedes contact between Florence catheter and the gastric mucosa (barrier effect) like sucralfate, aluminum hydroxide, bismuth subsalicylate, magaldrate, etc.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Council of Science and Technology, Mexico

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Gerbera Capital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Alandra Medical SAPI de CV

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Critical Perfusion Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rolando J. Álvarez Álvarez, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez

Montserrat Godínez, MSc

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Alandra Medical SAPI de CV

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez

Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Mexico

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/cardio/h-2016/hs163a.pdf

Arias AS, Serrano MEB, Altamirano BD, Ortega MG, Gonzalez GG. Cardiovascular illness: first cause of morbility in a third level hospital. Cardiology Mexican Journal; 2016

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24055446

Mittal R, Coopersmith CM. Redefining the gut as the motor of critical illness. Trends in molecular medicine. 2014 Apr;20:214-223

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23361625

Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Critical care medicine. 2013 Feb;41:580-637

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17285286

Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJD, Chastre J, Hudson LD, Manthous C, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. International Consensus Conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive care medicine. 2007 Apr;33:575-590

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15681577

Nieminen MS, Boehm M, Cowie MR, Drexler H, Filippatos GS, Jondeau G, et al. Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure: the Task Force on Acute Heart Failure of the European Society of Cardiology.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22611136

McMurray JJV, Adamopoulos S, Anker SD, Auricchio A, Boehm M, Dickstein K, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure2012

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11445675

Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Critical care medicine. 2001 Jul;29:1303-1310

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14997295

Brun-Buisson C, Meshaka P, Pinton P, Vallet B, Group ES. EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units. Intensive care medicine. 2004 Apr;30:580-588

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17323051

Engel C, Brunkhorst FM, Bone HG, Brunkhorst R, Gerlach H, Grond S, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis in Germany: results from a national prospective multicenter study. Intensive care medicine. 2007 Apr;33:606-618

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17414725

Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, Penuelas O, Lorente JA, Gordo F, et al. Sepsis incidence and outcome: contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward. Critical care medicine. 2007 May;35:1284-1289

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968574/

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al.. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3); 2016

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16046651

Babaev A, Frederick PD, Pasta DJ, Every N, Sichrovsky T, Hochman JS, et al. Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA. 2005 Jul;294:448-454

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12161222

Steg PG, Goldberg RJ, Gore JM, Fox KAA, Eagle KA, Flather MD, et al. Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute coronary syndromes in the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17828438

Koek HL, Kardaun JWPF, Gevers E, de Bruin A, Reitsma JB, Grobbee DE, et al. Acute myocardial infarction incidence and hospital mortality: routinely collected national data versus linkage of national registers. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2007

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11874305

Roger VL, Jacobsen SJ, Weston SA, Goraya TY, Killian J, Reeder GS, et al. Trends in the incidence and survival of patients with hospitalized myocardial infarction, Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1979 to 1994. Annals of internal medicine. 2002 Mar;136:341-348

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12352031

Geppert A, Steiner A, Zorn G, Delle-Karth G, Koreny M, Haumer M, et al. Multiple organ failure in patients with cardiogenic shock is associated with high plasma levels of interleukin-6. Critical care medicine. 2002 Sep;30:1987-1994

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20966436

Hamilton MA, Cecconi M, Rhodes A. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of preemptive hemodynamic intervention to improve postoperative outcomes in moderate and high-risk surgical patients. Anesthesia and analgesia. 2011 Jun;112:1392-1402

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24694282

Helander HF, Fändriks L. Surface area of the digestive tract - revisited. Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. 2014 Jun;49:681-689

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25417158

Thome JJC, Yudanin N, Ohmura Y, Kubota M, Grinshpun B, Sathaliyawala T, et al. Spatial map of human T cell compartmentalization and maintenance over decades of life. Cell. 2014 Nov; 159:814-828

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23370829

Reintam B, Poeze M, Malbrain ML, Björck M, Oudemans-van Straaten H. Starkopf J, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms during the first week of intensive care are associated with poor outcome: a prospective multicentre study. Intensive Care Medicine. 2013

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17577136

Clark JA, Coopersmith CM. Intestinal crosstalk: a new paradigm for understanding the gut as the "motor" of critical illness. Shock (Augusta, Ga). 2007 Oct; 28:384-393

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27016162

Klingensmith NJ, Coopersmith CM. The Gut as the Motor of Multiple Organ Dysfunction in Critical Illness; 2016

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17933153

van Haren FMP, Sleigh JW, Pickkers P, Van der Hoeven JG. Gastrointestinal perfusion in septic shock. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Oct;35(5):679-694

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8528108

McAdams ET, Jossinet J. Tissue impedance: a historical overview. Physiol Meas. 1995 Aug;16(3 Suppl A):A1-13. Historical Article Journal Article

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2662632

Kim DW. Detection of physiological events by impedance. Yonsei Med J. 1989;30(1):1-11

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4067112

Grimnes S, Martinsen OG. Comments on "Algorithm for Tissue Ischemia Estimation Based on Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy". IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 2007 Feb;54(2):344-344

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9196884

Rigaud B, Morucci JP, Chauveau N. Bioelectrical impedance techniques in medicine. Part I: Bioimpedance measurement. Second section: impedance spectrometry. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 1996;24(4-6):257-351

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/415187

Kun S, Peura RA. Tissue ischemia detection using impedance spectroscopy. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1994. Engineering Advances: New Opportunities for Biomedical Engineers. Proceedings of the 16th Annual International Conference

https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/758768

Ristic B, Kun S, Peura RA. Muscle tissue ischemia monitoring using impedance spectroscopy: quantitative results of animal studies. In: Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1997. Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15798229

Ivorra A, Genesca M, Sola A, Palacios L, Villa R, Hotter G, et al. Bioimpedance dispersion width as a parameter to monitor living tissues. Physiol Meas. 2005 Apr;26(2):S165-73. Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2651001

Foster KR, Schwan HP. Dielectric properties of tissues and biological materials: a critical review. Critical reviews in biomedical engineering. 1989;17:25-104

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11713146

Rackow EC, O'Neil P, Astiz ME, Carpati CM. Sublingual capnometry and indexes of tissue perfusion in patients with circulatory failure. Chest. 2001 Nov;120:1633-1638

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8087035

Rigaud B, Hamzaoui L, Chauveau N, Granie M, Scotto Di Rinaldi JP, Morucci JP. Tissue characterization by impedance: a multifrequency approach. Physiol Meas. 1994 May;15 Suppl 2a:A13-20

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27687052

Sullivan PG, Wallach JD, Ioannidis JPA. Meta-Analysis Comparing Established Risk Prediction Models (EuroSCORE II, STS Score, and ACEF Score) for Perioperative Mortality During Cardiac Surgery. The American journal of cardiology. 2016 Nov;118:1574-1582

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22378855

Nashef SAM, Roques F, Sharples LD, Nilsson J, Smith C, Goldstone AR, et al. EuroSCORE II. European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery. 2012 Apr;41:734-44; discussion 744-5

http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0188-21982014000100010&nrm=iso

A GVO. EuroSCORE II: Como se usa en la practica actual. Revista Mexicana de Cardiologia. 2014 03;25:50 - 51

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9824069

Vincent JL, de Mendonca A, Cantraine F, Moreno R, Takala J, Suter PM, et al. Use of the SOFA score to assess the incidence of organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care units: results of a multicenter, prospective study. Working group on "sepsis-related

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10470572

Moreno R, Vincent JL, Matos R, Mendoca A, Cantraine F, Thijs L, et al. The use of maximum SOFA score to quantify organ dysfunction/failure in intensive care. Results of a prospective, multicentre study. Working Group on Sepsis related Problems

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10990106

de Mendonca A, Vincent JL, Suter PM, Moreno R, Dearden NM, Antonelli M, et al. Acute renal failure in the ICU: risk factors and outcome evaluated by the SOFA score. Intensive care medicine. 2000 Jul;26:915-921

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11594901

Ferreira FL, Bota DP, Bross A, Melot C, Vincent JL. Serial evaluation of the SOFA score to predict outcome in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2001 Oct;286:1754-1758

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3928249

Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Critical care medicine. 1985 Oct;13:818-829

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6851607

NIH. Consensus Development Conference on critical care medicine. Critical care medicine. 1983 Jun;11:466-469

http://anesthesiology.pubs.asahq.org/article.aspx?articleid=1960390

Cullen DJ. Results and costs of intensive care. Anesthesiology. 1977 Aug;47:203-216

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8087584

Chalfin DB, Fein AM. Critical care medicine in managed competition and a managed care environment. New horizons (Baltimore, Md). 1994 Aug;2:275-282

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19559823

O'Brien SM, Shahian DM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 2-isolated valve surgery. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2009 Jul;88:S23-S42

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19559822

Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 1-coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2009 Jul;88:S2-22

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19559824

Shahian DM, O'Brien SM, Filardo G, Ferraris VA, Haan CK, Rich JB, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 cardiac surgery risk models: part 3-valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2009 Jul;88:S43-S62

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23522221

Rankin JS, He X, O'Brien SM, Jacobs JP, Welke KF, Filardo G, et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk model for operative mortality after multiple valve surgery. The Annals of thoracic surgery. 2013 Apr;95:1484-1490

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

17-1025

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

ISM_VC_01_17

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cardiopediatric Home Monitoring Tool
NCT06741189 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA