Differences in Frail and Non-frail Critically-ill Patients in Functional Outcomes

NCT ID: NCT03789305

Last Updated: 2019-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

731 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-01

Study Completion Date

2018-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a prospective analysis of patient registry data of intensive care patients. The aim is to investigate if frailty is a predictor of decline of functional status of critically ill patients during their hospital stay.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Elderly critical-ill patients with a high frailty level are becoming increasingly important in the ICU and the health system. Especially, questions about the course of the individual proceeding, withhold of therapy and level of care are controversial among caretakers, as outcome and functional independence remain still unclear in these patients.

This applies particularly in view of the fact that large studies such as VIP1 showed an inverse association of high frailty classes with short-term survival.

Our main objective in this study was to focus on functional outcome and independency measured by Barthel Index after ICU stay regarding frailty, the effect of critical care and severity and prognosis of the disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Care Rehabilitation Outcome Assessment Critical Illness Frailty Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Exercise Therapy Intensive Care Unit

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Critically ill patients

Critically ill patients admitted to intensive care for more than 48 hours

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* intensive care stay \> 48 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* none
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Technical University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stefan Schaller

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stefan J Schaller, MD, MHBA

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Technical University of Munich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich

Munich, Bavaria, Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Clegg A, Young J, Iliffe S, Rikkert MO, Rockwood K. Frailty in elderly people. Lancet. 2013 Mar 2;381(9868):752-62. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62167-9. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23395245 (View on PubMed)

Flaatten H, De Lange DW, Morandi A, Andersen FH, Artigas A, Bertolini G, Boumendil A, Cecconi M, Christensen S, Faraldi L, Fjolner J, Jung C, Marsh B, Moreno R, Oeyen S, Ohman CA, Pinto BB, Soliman IW, Szczeklik W, Valentin A, Watson X, Zaferidis T, Guidet B; VIP1 study group. The impact of frailty on ICU and 30-day mortality and the level of care in very elderly patients (>/= 80 years). Intensive Care Med. 2017 Dec;43(12):1820-1828. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4940-8. Epub 2017 Sep 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28936626 (View on PubMed)

Latronico N, Herridge M, Hopkins RO, Angus D, Hart N, Hermans G, Iwashyna T, Arabi Y, Citerio G, Ely EW, Hall J, Mehta S, Puntillo K, Van den Hoeven J, Wunsch H, Cook D, Dos Santos C, Rubenfeld G, Vincent JL, Van den Berghe G, Azoulay E, Needham DM. The ICM research agenda on intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Intensive Care Med. 2017 Sep;43(9):1270-1281. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4757-5. Epub 2017 Mar 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28289812 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

DEFAULT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Strength Training and Stroke
NCT00629005 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2