Effects of Mobility Dose on Discharge Disposition in Critically Ill Stroke Patients
NCT ID: NCT03347656
Last Updated: 2024-08-20
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
164 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-10-12
2021-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Differences in Frail and Non-frail Critically-ill Patients in Functional Outcomes
NCT03789305
The Effect of Early Mobilization in Mild to Moderate Hemorrhagic Stroke
NCT03292211
Eccentric Contraction-based Resistance Exercise for Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT04600050
Ischemic Conditioning Chronic Stroke Study
NCT04039399
Early Physical Therapy in Patients With Sepsis
NCT01787045
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This is a prospective, observational study to observe the relation between mobility dose, muscle wasting and patient outcomes in critically ill stroke patients.
Patients will be enrolled within 48 hours of ICU admission. The investigators will measure the dose of activity, that is duration and intensity of mobilization in critically ill patients with ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage. By mobility "dose" the investigators are referring to all provider-directed activities (by nursing, and physical therapists) meant to enhance the patient's mobility level. The investigators take into account mobility "dose", defined as a function of both the mobility level (e.g., sitting at the edge of the bed, ambulating) as well as its duration. Of note, there is so far no published data available that describes patients' mobility "dose" in such an integrative, semi-quantitative fashion.
The investigators use the existing mobility intensity quantification tool (MQS) (NCT03196960) and test the hypotheses that mobilization dose predicts muscle wasting in critically ill stroke patients, adverse hospital discharge disposition as well as 90 day Barthel Index. The investigators will apply hierarchical testing to evaluate the association between mobilization dose and discharge disposition as well as 90-day Barthel Index.
The Mobilization Quantification Score (MQS) is a composition of the validated ICU mobility score (SOMS), a 0 to 10 value scale that measures the mobility milestones in critically ill patients, multiplied by a for each level previously defined time unit (5 or 30 minutes correspond to one unit depending on mobilization level).
In order to capture the muscle status at ICU admission, determined by the first bedside ultrasound of the rectus femoris muscle after enrollment, and the change in rectus femoris muscle diameter throughout stay, the investigators will conduct repetitive measurements of the cross sectional area of the rectus femoris muscles (RF-CSA) of both legs. This longitudinal setting will allow to investigate muscle wasting due to immobilization and other severe illness related factors in the paretic and non-paretic limb.
The investigators will conduct a scheduled phone call 30 days and 90 days after hospital discharge by getting in contact with either the patient or a family member to obtain follow-up data. This conversation will include questions that allow to identify the Barthel Index at 30 days, the Barthel Index and GOS-E score at 90 days, and if the patient has been readmitted to a hospital within 30 days of hospital discharge and mortality.
Discharge disposition is defined as discharge to facilities providing long-term care assistance for daily activities, including nursing homes and skilled nursing facilities, hospice at the patient's home, hospice in a health care facility; or in-hospital mortality. The Barthel Index is a measure of functional disability originally designed to evaluate progress of rehabilitation in patients with stroke and neuromuscular disease. The GOS-E (Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale) is a global scale for functional outcome that rates patient status into eight categories: Dead Vegetative State, Upper and Lower Severe Disability, Upper and Lower Moderate Disability, Upper and Lower Good Recovery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Admitted to the neurological intensive care service within the past 48 hours
* an expected ICU length of stay of at least 48h
* New onset ischemic stroke or non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage
* Baseline functional independence: Barthel-Index of 70 or above 2 weeks before admission (obtained retrospectively from patient or proxy)
Exclusion Criteria
* absence of lower extremities
* not committed to full support
* exclusive or clinically predominant posterior circulation ischemic stroke
* subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural and epidural hemorrhage
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Technical University of Munich
OTHER
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Balachundhar Subramaniam
Professor of Anesthesia
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Balachundhar Subramaniam, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Beth Israel Deconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Klinikum rechts der Isar of Technische Universität München
Munich, Bavaria, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Schaller SJ, Anstey M, Blobner M, Edrich T, Grabitz SD, Gradwohl-Matis I, Heim M, Houle T, Kurth T, Latronico N, Lee J, Meyer MJ, Peponis T, Talmor D, Velmahos GC, Waak K, Walz JM, Zafonte R, Eikermann M; International Early SOMS-guided Mobilization Research Initiative. Early, goal-directed mobilisation in the surgical intensive care unit: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1377-1388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31637-3.
Mueller N, Murthy S, Tainter CR, Lee J, Riddell K, Fintelmann FJ, Grabitz SD, Timm FP, Levi B, Kurth T, Eikermann M. Can Sarcopenia Quantified by Ultrasound of the Rectus Femoris Muscle Predict Adverse Outcome of Surgical Intensive Care Unit Patients as well as Frailty? A Prospective, Observational Cohort Study. Ann Surg. 2016 Dec;264(6):1116-1124. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001546.
Lee JJ, Waak K, Grosse-Sundrup M, Xue F, Lee J, Chipman D, Ryan C, Bittner EA, Schmidt U, Eikermann M. Global muscle strength but not grip strength predicts mortality and length of stay in a general population in a surgical intensive care unit. Phys Ther. 2012 Dec;92(12):1546-55. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20110403. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
Kasotakis G, Schmidt U, Perry D, Grosse-Sundrup M, Benjamin J, Ryan C, Tully S, Hirschberg R, Waak K, Velmahos G, Bittner EA, Zafonte R, Cobb JP, Eikermann M. The surgical intensive care unit optimal mobility score predicts mortality and length of stay. Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1122-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182376e6d.
Sainsbury A, Seebass G, Bansal A, Young JB. Reliability of the Barthel Index when used with older people. Age Ageing. 2005 May;34(3):228-32. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afi063.
Inouye SK, van Dyck CH, Alessi CA, Balkin S, Siegal AP, Horwitz RI. Clarifying confusion: the confusion assessment method. A new method for detection of delirium. Ann Intern Med. 1990 Dec 15;113(12):941-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-113-12-941.
Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma. 1998 Aug;15(8):573-85. doi: 10.1089/neu.1998.15.573.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2017P000528
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.