Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
162 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2015-01-01
2018-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Early Prediction of QFR in STEMI-Pharmaco-invasice
NCT04220736
Early Assessment of QFR in STEMI-II
NCT03910400
Myocardial Work for Prediction of Left Ventricular Remodeling in Patients With STEMI
NCT05107102
Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Myocardial Strain in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT05404555
Association Between Peri-procedural Myocardial Injury and Quantitative Blood Flow Ratio
NCT07110298
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study is a retrospective study using STEMI patients with TFG 2/3 of the infarct vessel on initial angiography and presumed culprit lesion ≥50% as the population. Contrast-enhanced CMR was performed 5 days after PCI as the reference standard.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
MVO group
CMR was performed in all the cases. According to the results of CMR, we divided the study population into MVO group and Non-MVO group.
Computation of quantitative flow ratio
Computation of QFR was performed offline, using AngioPlus system(Pluse medical imaging technology, Shanghai, China). In the first step, 2 diagnostic angiographic projections before PCI, at least 25° apart, were selected and 3D reconstruction of the interrogated vessel without its side branches was performed. Then, the software computed the QFR.
Non-MVO group
CMR was performed in all the cases. According to the results of CMR, we divided the study population into MVO group and Non-MVO group.
Computation of quantitative flow ratio
Computation of QFR was performed offline, using AngioPlus system(Pluse medical imaging technology, Shanghai, China). In the first step, 2 diagnostic angiographic projections before PCI, at least 25° apart, were selected and 3D reconstruction of the interrogated vessel without its side branches was performed. Then, the software computed the QFR.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Computation of quantitative flow ratio
Computation of QFR was performed offline, using AngioPlus system(Pluse medical imaging technology, Shanghai, China). In the first step, 2 diagnostic angiographic projections before PCI, at least 25° apart, were selected and 3D reconstruction of the interrogated vessel without its side branches was performed. Then, the software computed the QFR.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with TFG 2/3 in the initial angiography of the culprit vessel.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with residual stenosis \<50%.
* Patients with unqualified coronary angiographic images with problems such as ostial lesion, severe vessel tortuosity and diffuse long lesions.
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
RenJi Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Niccoli G, Burzotta F, Galiuto L, Crea F. Myocardial no-reflow in humans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009 Jul 21;54(4):281-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.03.054.
Sheng X, Ding S, Ge H, Sun Y, Kong L, He J, Pu J, He B. Intracoronary infusion of alprostadil and nitroglycerin with targeted perfusion microcatheter in STEMI patients with coronary slow flow phenomenon. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Aug 15;265:6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.04.119. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, Caffarelli AD, Robbins RC, Fitzgerald PJ, Yock PG, Yeung AC. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation. 2003 Jul 1;107(25):3129-32. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080700.98607.D1. Epub 2003 Jun 23.
Fearon WF, Shah M, Ng M, Brinton T, Wilson A, Tremmel JA, Schnittger I, Lee DP, Vagelos RH, Fitzgerald PJ, Yock PG, Yeung AC. Predictive value of the index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Feb 5;51(5):560-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.08.062.
Fearon WF, Low AF, Yong AC, McGeoch R, Berry C, Shah MG, Ho M, Kim HS, Loh JP, Oldroyd KG. Response to letter regarding article, "Prognostic value of the index of microcirculatory resistance measured after primary percutaneous coronary intervention". Circulation. 2014 Feb 18;129(7):e342. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.007271. No abstract available.
van de Hoef TP, Nolte F, EchavarrIa-Pinto M, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, Chamuleau SA, Voskuil M, Verberne HJ, Henriques JP, van Eck-Smit BL, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Spaan JA, Siebes M, Tijssen JG, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ. Impact of hyperaemic microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from combined stenosis and microvascular resistance assessment. Heart. 2014 Jun;100(12):951-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2013-305124. Epub 2014 Apr 11.
Tu S, Echavarria-Pinto M, von Birgelen C, Holm NR, Pyxaras SA, Kumsars I, Lam MK, Valkenburg I, Toth GG, Li Y, Escaned J, Wijns W, Reiber JH. Fractional flow reserve and coronary bifurcation anatomy: a novel quantitative model to assess and report the stenosis severity of bifurcation lesions. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):564-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.12.232. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
Emori H, Kubo T, Kameyama T, Ino Y, Matsuo Y, Kitabata H, Terada K, Katayama Y, Aoki H, Taruya A, Shimamura K, Ota S, Tanaka A, Hozumi T, Akasaka T. Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessing Myocardial Ischemia in Prior Myocardial Infarction. Circ J. 2018 Feb 23;82(3):807-814. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-17-0949. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
Spitaleri G, Tebaldi M, Biscaglia S, Westra J, Brugaletta S, Erriquez A, Passarini G, Brieda A, Leone AM, Picchi A, Ielasi A, Girolamo DD, Trani C, Ferrari R, Reiber JHC, Valgimigli M, Sabate M, Campo G. Quantitative Flow Ratio Identifies Nonculprit Coronary Lesions Requiring Revascularization in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb;11(2):e006023. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.006023.
Tu S, Westra J, Yang J, von Birgelen C, Ferrara A, Pellicano M, Nef H, Tebaldi M, Murasato Y, Lansky A, Barbato E, van der Heijden LC, Reiber JHC, Holm NR, Wijns W; FAVOR Pilot Trial Study Group. Diagnostic Accuracy of Fast Computational Approaches to Derive Fractional Flow Reserve From Diagnostic Coronary Angiography: The International Multicenter FAVOR Pilot Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2024-2035. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.013.
Pu J, Ding S, Ge H, Han Y, Guo J, Lin R, Su X, Zhang H, Chen L, He B; EARLY-MYO Investigators. Efficacy and Safety of a Pharmaco-Invasive Strategy With Half-Dose Alteplase Versus Primary Angioplasty in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: EARLY-MYO Trial (Early Routine Catheterization After Alteplase Fibrinolysis Versus Primary PCI in Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction). Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):1462-1473. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030582. Epub 2017 Aug 27.
Cuculi F, De Maria GL, Meier P, Dall'Armellina E, de Caterina AR, Channon KM, Prendergast BD, Choudhury RP, Forfar JC, Kharbanda RK, Banning AP. Impact of microvascular obstruction on the assessment of coronary flow reserve, index of microcirculatory resistance, and fractional flow reserve after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Nov 4;64(18):1894-904. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.07.987. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
Mejia-Renteria H, Lee JM, Lauri F, van der Hoeven NW, de Waard GA, Macaya F, Perez-Vizcayno MJ, Gonzalo N, Jimenez-Quevedo P, Nombela-Franco L, Salinas P, Nunez-Gil I, Del Trigo M, Goto S, Lee HJ, Liontou C, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Macaya C, van Royen N, Koo BK, Escaned J. Influence of Microcirculatory Dysfunction on Angiography-Based Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenoses. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 23;11(8):741-753. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.02.014.
Sheng X, Qiao Z, Ge H, Sun J, He J, Li Z, Ding S, Pu J. Novel application of quantitative flow ratio for predicting microvascular dysfunction after ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb;95 Suppl 1:624-632. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28718. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
16CR3034A
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.