Incisional Hernia Rate After Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT ID: NCT03768661
Last Updated: 2020-04-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
185 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-07-01
2017-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study evaluated SILC and standard multiport cholecystectomy with respect to perioperative outcomes, hospital stay, cosmetic results, and postoperative complications, including the 5-years incisional hernia rate.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Risk of Umbilical Trocar-site Hernia After SILC Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Cholecystectomy
NCT01740973
Single Incision Versus Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03067038
A Trial of Single Incision Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02375529
The Comparison of Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01772745
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00678873
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study inclusion criteria were the following: patients over 18 years with cholelithiasis, and candidates for elective surgery with no significant cardiopulmonary, hepatic or renal impairment (ASA score less than 4).
The exclusion criteria included the following: acute cholecystitis, associated CBD stones or pancreatitis, an emergency operation for complicated disease, mental illness, or patient refusal and/or absence of informed consent. All included patients signed a standard consent form after being informed about the characteristics of the SILC procedure.
The outcomes of these patients were compared with those of a control cohort series of 140 patients who underwent standard LC (with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria) during the same period.
The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the incisional hernia rate at the umbilical wound after 5 years of follow-up. Hernias were defined as evidence of a hernia at the clinical examination or those confirmed by ultrasound examination in case of clinical doubt.
The study secondary endpoints included the following: duration of surgery (from the start of the incision to skin closure), intraoperative and postoperative complications (30 days), hospital stay, and cosmetic satisfaction results (measured using a visual analogue scale score ranging from 0 to 10).
The following variables were also collected: age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities. The anesthetic risk was measured according to the ASA classification system. Prolonged hospital stay (more than 24 h) and readmission (patients who returned for medical consultation before scheduled follow-up) were also recorded. All data were collected prospectively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SILC Group
patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis submitted to a single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Single-incision Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed through a single device located at a unique umbilical incision
Laparoscopy Group
patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis submitted to a standard three trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed using three-trocars standard technique
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Single-incision Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed through a single device located at a unique umbilical incision
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed using three-trocars standard technique
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* abscence of significant cardiopulmonary, hepatic or renal impairment (ASA score less than 4)
Exclusion Criteria
* associated common bile duct stones or pancreatitis
* emergency operation for complicated disease
* ASA 4 (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
* pregnancy
* mental illness
* patient refusal and/or absence of informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Plató
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos Hoyuela, MD PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chief, Dept. of Surgery
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Plató
Barcelona, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):367-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1217-5. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
Evers L, Bouvy N, Branje D, Peeters A. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3437-3448. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5381-0. Epub 2016 Dec 30.
Jorgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Al-Tayar H, Assaadzadeh S, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T. Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2014 Mar;101(4):347-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9393.
Arezzo A, Passera R, Bullano A, Mintz Y, Kedar A, Boni L, Cassinotti E, Rosati R, Fumagalli Romario U, Sorrentino M, Brizzolari M, Di Lorenzo N, Gaspari AL, Andreone D, De Stefani E, Navarra G, Lazzara S, Degiuli M, Shishin K, Khatkov I, Kazakov I, Schrittwieser R, Carus T, Corradi A, Sitzman G, Lacy A, Uranues S, Szold A, Morino M. Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial). Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2872-2880. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5298-7. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Guillaumes S, Ardid J, Trias M, Bachero I, Martrat A. Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study. Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1205-1213. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01969-x. Epub 2019 May 9.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Procedure-Associated (PA) Module: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SILS Chole Hernia
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.