Incisional Hernia Rate After Single-incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT03768661

Last Updated: 2020-04-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

185 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-07-01

Study Completion Date

2017-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) requires a larger incision than standard laparoscopy, which may increase the incidence of incisional hernias.

This study evaluated SILC and standard multiport cholecystectomy with respect to perioperative outcomes, hospital stay, cosmetic results, and postoperative complications, including the 5-years incisional hernia rate.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A cohort study was performed for patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy under an institutional review approved protocol. Between 2009 and 2011, 45 unselected patients underwent SILC performed by the same two surgeons.

The study inclusion criteria were the following: patients over 18 years with cholelithiasis, and candidates for elective surgery with no significant cardiopulmonary, hepatic or renal impairment (ASA score less than 4).

The exclusion criteria included the following: acute cholecystitis, associated CBD stones or pancreatitis, an emergency operation for complicated disease, mental illness, or patient refusal and/or absence of informed consent. All included patients signed a standard consent form after being informed about the characteristics of the SILC procedure.

The outcomes of these patients were compared with those of a control cohort series of 140 patients who underwent standard LC (with the same inclusion and exclusion criteria) during the same period.

The primary endpoint of the study was to determine the incisional hernia rate at the umbilical wound after 5 years of follow-up. Hernias were defined as evidence of a hernia at the clinical examination or those confirmed by ultrasound examination in case of clinical doubt.

The study secondary endpoints included the following: duration of surgery (from the start of the incision to skin closure), intraoperative and postoperative complications (30 days), hospital stay, and cosmetic satisfaction results (measured using a visual analogue scale score ranging from 0 to 10).

The following variables were also collected: age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and comorbidities. The anesthetic risk was measured according to the ASA classification system. Prolonged hospital stay (more than 24 h) and readmission (patients who returned for medical consultation before scheduled follow-up) were also recorded. All data were collected prospectively.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cholelithiasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SILC Group

patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis submitted to a single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Single-incision Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed through a single device located at a unique umbilical incision

Laparoscopy Group

patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis submitted to a standard three trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed using three-trocars standard technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Single-incision Laparoscopic cholecystectomy

laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed through a single device located at a unique umbilical incision

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed using three-trocars standard technique

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients over 18 years with cholelithiasis and candidates for elective surgery (cholecystectomy)
* abscence of significant cardiopulmonary, hepatic or renal impairment (ASA score less than 4)

Exclusion Criteria

* acute cholecystitis
* associated common bile duct stones or pancreatitis
* emergency operation for complicated disease
* ASA 4 (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
* pregnancy
* mental illness
* patient refusal and/or absence of informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital Plató

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Carlos Hoyuela, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Chief, Dept. of Surgery

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Plató

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Antoniou SA, Pointner R, Granderath FA. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):367-77. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1217-5. Epub 2010 Jul 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20607556 (View on PubMed)

Evers L, Bouvy N, Branje D, Peeters A. Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conventional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3437-3448. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5381-0. Epub 2016 Dec 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28039641 (View on PubMed)

Jorgensen LN, Rosenberg J, Al-Tayar H, Assaadzadeh S, Helgstrand F, Bisgaard T. Randomized clinical trial of single- versus multi-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2014 Mar;101(4):347-55. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9393.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24536008 (View on PubMed)

Arezzo A, Passera R, Bullano A, Mintz Y, Kedar A, Boni L, Cassinotti E, Rosati R, Fumagalli Romario U, Sorrentino M, Brizzolari M, Di Lorenzo N, Gaspari AL, Andreone D, De Stefani E, Navarra G, Lazzara S, Degiuli M, Shishin K, Khatkov I, Kazakov I, Schrittwieser R, Carus T, Corradi A, Sitzman G, Lacy A, Uranues S, Szold A, Morino M. Multi-port versus single-port cholecystectomy: results of a multi-centre, randomised controlled trial (MUSIC trial). Surg Endosc. 2017 Jul;31(7):2872-2880. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5298-7. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27778171 (View on PubMed)

Hoyuela C, Juvany M, Guillaumes S, Ardid J, Trias M, Bachero I, Martrat A. Long-term incisional hernia rate after single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is significantly higher than that after standard three-port laparoscopy: a cohort study. Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1205-1213. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01969-x. Epub 2019 May 9.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31073959 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-guidelines/asa-physical-status-classification-system

American Society of Anesthesiologists. ASA Physical Status Classification System

http://www.cdc.gov/nhsn/PDFs/pscManual/9pscSSIcurrent.pdf

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) Procedure-Associated (PA) Module: Surgical Site Infection (SSI) Event

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SILS Chole Hernia

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Complications of Cholecystostomy in ACC
NCT06227936 NOT_YET_RECRUITING
3-midline-ports Cholecystectomy
NCT01378819 COMPLETED PHASE3
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:
NCT04107909 UNKNOWN NA