Early Versus Late Intervention After Biliary Tract Injury Post Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT04134546

Last Updated: 2019-10-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-30

Study Completion Date

2022-10-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy is an iatrogenic catastrophe associated with significant peri operative morbidity and mortality(1, 2) reduced long term survival(3) and quality of life(4, 5) and high rates of subsequent litigation6. It should be regarded as preventable.

The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has resulted in a resurgence of interest in bile duct injury and its subsequent management. Population based studies(6.7) suggest a significant increase in the incidence of injury (0•1 to 0•5 per cent) following the implementation of the laparoscopic approach(8) Bile duct injury should be regarded as preventable, but over 70 per cent of surgeons regard it as unavoidable(9). Although most injuries occur within the surgeon's first 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, one third happen after the surgeon has performed more than 200; it is more than inexperience that leads to bile duct injury(10). It has been suggested that the commonest cause of common bile duct injury is misidentification of biliary anatomy (70-80 per cent of injuries)(11,12),a reduction in risk if surgeons perform routine intraoperative cholangiography Recognition of bile duct injury at the time of cholecystectomy allows an opportunity for the hepatobiliary surgeon to assess its severity and the presence of any vascular injury

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Bile duct injury following cholecystectomy is an iatrogenic catastrophe associated with significant peri operative morbidity and mortality(1, 2) reduced long term survival(3) and quality of life(4, 5) and high rates of subsequent litigation6. It should be regarded as preventable.

The advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has resulted in a resurgence of interest in bile duct injury and its subsequent management. Population based studies(6.7) suggest a significant increase in the incidence of injury (0•1 to 0•5 per cent) following the implementation of the laparoscopic approach(8) Bile duct injury should be regarded as preventable, but over 70 per cent of surgeons regard it as unavoidable(9). Although most injuries occur within the surgeon's first 100 laparoscopic cholecystectomies, one third happen after the surgeon has performed more than 200; it is more than inexperience that leads to bile duct injury(10). It has been suggested that the commonest cause of common bile duct injury is misidentification of biliary anatomy (70-80 per cent of injuries)(11,12),a reduction in risk if surgeons perform routine intraoperative cholangiography Recognition of bile duct injury at the time of cholecystectomy allows an opportunity for the hepatobiliary surgeon to assess its severity and the presence of any vascular injury

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Biliary Fistula

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

group with biliary injury

group for Early versus late intervention after biliary tract injury post cholecystectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CBD exoloration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Early versus late intervention after biliary tract injury post cholecystectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CBD exoloration

Early versus late intervention after biliary tract injury post cholecystectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients with post cholecystectomy biliary tract injury admitted at Assuit university hospital at the period of the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Any case with biliary leakage not post cholecystectomy
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bassem Barghoth Sabet Amin

resident doctor at general surgery department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

biliary tract injury

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.