Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
272 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-03-31
2022-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Solo and Non-solo Approach for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02978989
Single Incision Versus Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03067038
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00678873
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00981604
Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, a Randomized Controlled Clinical Study
NCT05728463
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Total of 272 patients who were undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder disorders will randomly assign to two groups according to a computer-generated table of random numbers Solo-SILC group using a laparoscopic camera holder (n=136) or Ca-SILC group in which a camera operator joins (n=136). .
Demographics (i.e., age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score, indication for operation, need for conversion to open surgery or additional port will be recorded. Outcome including pain, hernia, complication rates, post-cholecystectomy diarrhea, operator's workload will be investigated
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Solo-SILC
Solo surgery using a laparoscopic camera holder instead of a camera operator in SILC
Solo surgery
Solo surgery using a camera scope holder in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
Ca-SILC
No solo surgery, operation with a camera operator in SILC
operation with a camera operator in SILC
conventional single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a scopist
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Solo surgery
Solo surgery using a camera scope holder in single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy
operation with a camera operator in SILC
conventional single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a scopist
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* unstable vital sign
* no compliance
* no consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chungbuk National University Hospital
OTHER
Gyeongsang National University Hospital
OTHER
Seoul National University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
YoungRok Choi
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Soyeon Ahn, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical Research Collaboration Center Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Navarra G, Pozza E, Occhionorelli S, Carcoforo P, Donini I. One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1997 May;84(5):695. No abstract available.
Tsimoyiannis EC, Tsimogiannis KE, Pappas-Gogos G, Farantos C, Benetatos N, Mavridou P, Manataki A. Different pain scores in single transumbilical incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus classic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010 Aug;24(8):1842-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-0887-3. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Marks J, Tacchino R, Roberts K, Onders R, Denoto G, Paraskeva P, Rivas H, Soper N, Rosemurgy A, Shah S. Prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: report of preliminary data. Am J Surg. 2011 Mar;201(3):369-72; discussion 372-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.09.012.
Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Thrumurthy S, Muirhead L, Kinross J, Paraskeva P. Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1205-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
Phillips MS, Marks JM, Roberts K, Tacchino R, Onders R, DeNoto G, Rivas H, Islam A, Soper N, Gecelter G, Rubach E, Paraskeva P, Shah S. Intermediate results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of traditional four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1296-303. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2028-z. Epub 2011 Nov 15.
Deveci U, Barbaros U, Kapakli MS, Manukyan MN, Simsek S, Kebudi A, Mercan S. The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Dec;85(6):275-82. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.85.6.275. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
Gillen S, Pletzer B, Heiligensetzer A, Wolf P, Kleeff J, Feussner H, Furst A. Solo-surgical laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a joystick-guided camera device: a case-control study. Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):164-70. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3142-x. Epub 2013 Aug 29.
Sasaki K, Watanabe G, Matsuda M, Hashimoto M. Original single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute inflammation of the gallbladder. World J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar 7;18(9):944-51. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i9.944.
Chuang SH, Chen PH, Chang CM, Lin CS. Single-incision vs three-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy for complicated and uncomplicated acute cholecystitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Nov 21;19(43):7743-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i43.7743.
Sinha R, Yadav AS. Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy with conventional instruments: A continuing study. J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Oct;10(4):175-9. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.141502.
Saber AA, El-Ghazaly TH, Dewoolkar AV, Slayton SA. Single-incision laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: technical considerations and strategic modifications. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2010 Nov-Dec;6(6):658-64. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2010.03.004. Epub 2010 Mar 19.
Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):101-25. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SILC_HoOp
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.