Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery vs Flexible Single Incision Surgery for Cholecystectomy
NCT ID: NCT01558414
Last Updated: 2013-03-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-04-30
2012-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The trial is designed as a pilot study to assess, as main objective, if these two endoscopic approaches have the same security and effectiveness in cholecystectomy.
Hypothesis:
Transumbilical approaches with single port and single incision with the flexible endoscope have the same efficacy and safety performing the endoscopic cholecystectomy.
Objectives:
Main objective:
Assess whether both approaches are equally safe in its application to endoscopic cholecystectomy.
Secondary objectives:
Investigate the differences in the rate of conversion to open surgery between different surgical approaches.
Investigate the differences in the rate of wound infection between the different surgical approaches.
Investigate the differences in the rate of postoperative incisional hernias between different surgical approaches.
Investigate whether there are differences in the rate of overall complications, all-cause mortality and the cost between different surgical approaches.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Hybrid Natural Orifice Translumenal Surgery
NCT00835250
A Trial of Single Incision Versus Four Ports Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT02375529
Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00981604
Single Incision Versus Three Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03067038
Solo Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT03018964
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* Patients affected with symptomatic cholelithiasis with elective surgical indication, not urgent, aged between 18 and 65.
* Signing of informed consent for cholecystectomy and specific consent for the trial.
* Anesthetic risk ASA I-II.
Exclusion criteria:
* Presence of acute cholecystitis and / or suspicion of occupation of the main bile duct.
* ASA III and higher.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
SILS
Cholecystectomy performed by Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery with the SILS TM device
SILS Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy performed by Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery with the SILS TM device
FSIS
Cholecystectomy performed by Flexible Single Incision Surgery with the flexible endoscope through a single incision at the umbilicus
FSIS cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy performed by Flexible Single Incision Surgery with the flexible endoscope through a single incision at the umbilicus
Conventional laparoscopy
Cholecystectomy performed by a conventional laparoscopic approach
Conventional laparoscopy
Minimally invasive cholecystectomy through the conventional laparoscopic approach using 3 ports (one 11-cm umbilical port and two accessory 5-mm ports).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
SILS Cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy performed by Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery with the SILS TM device
FSIS cholecystectomy
Cholecystectomy performed by Flexible Single Incision Surgery with the flexible endoscope through a single incision at the umbilicus
Conventional laparoscopy
Minimally invasive cholecystectomy through the conventional laparoscopic approach using 3 ports (one 11-cm umbilical port and two accessory 5-mm ports).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* symptomatic cholelithiasis with an indication for laparoscopic surgery
* signed specific informed consent including specific information of the new surgical approach
* ASA 1 and 2.
Exclusion Criteria
* current or previous suspected bile duct's problems
* previous abdominal surgery
* umbilical and other abdominal hernias
* some other condition with increased risk to infection or abdominal wall problems.
* ASA 3 and more
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Mateo Orfila
OTHER
Jose F. Noguera
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jose F. Noguera
Chief Department of Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
José F Noguera, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Hospital Son Llàtzer
Juan C García, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Hospital Son Llàtzer
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Son Llàtzer
Palma de Mallorca, Balearic Islands, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sanchez-Margallo FM, Perez FJ, Sanchez MA, Asencio JM, del Carmen Tejonero M, Moreno C, Noguera J. Hybrid notes cholecystectomy in an experimental model of laparoscopic acute cholecystitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2011 Apr;21(2):e65-9. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31820a2079.
Noguera JF, Cuadrado A, Sanchez-Margallo FM, Dolz C, Asencio JM, Olea JM, Morales R, Lozano L, Vicens JC. Emergency transvaginal hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. Endoscopy. 2011 May;43(5):442-4. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256042. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
Noguera J, Dolz C, Cuadrado A, Olea J, Vilella A, Morales R. Hybrid transvaginal cholecystectomy, NOTES, and minilaparoscopy: analysis of a prospective clinical series. Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):876-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0288-z. Epub 2009 Jan 1.
Noguera J, Tejada S, Tortajada C, Sanchez A, Munoz J. Prospective, randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a single-port device with that of a flexible endoscope with no other device for transumbilical cholecystectomy: LLATZER-FSIS pilot study. Surg Endosc. 2013 Nov;27(11):4284-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3044-y. Epub 2013 Jun 29.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Llatzer-FSIS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.