Comparison of Single İncision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT02417857

Last Updated: 2015-04-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

58 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare outcomes of quality-of-life measures and evaluate the body image and cosmesis between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) and Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC).Twenty eight patients underwent SILC and 30 underwent LC.Fifty-eight patients were included the study and divided into two groups. The results of the questionnaires were statistically compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recently, single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SILC) is one of the minimally invasive technique, developed to reduce the need of multiple ports and has become popular among the surgeons. This study was conducted with fifty eight patients between January 2011 and March 2013 in Turkey. Fifty-eight patients were included the study and divided into two groups. Quality-of-life measures was evaluated by the EuroQol EQ-5D questionnaire.Cosmesis and body image were evaluated with the Body Image Questionnaire. All statistical analyses were performed by IBM Statistics 21.0 and MS-Excel 2007. A value of p\<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Laparoscopic Surgical Procedures

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC)

Group 1: Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Intervention)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Single Incision)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

We performed Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) operation to the group-1

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC)

Group 2: Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Intervention)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Conventional)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

We performed Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC) to group-2

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Single Incision)

We performed Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (SILC) operation to the group-1

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (Conventional)

We performed Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC) to group-2

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The patients who were scheduled for elective cholecystectomy were included in the study

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnancy
* acute cholecystitis
* ASA 3-4 (American Society of Anesthesiologists)
* history of bile duct stone migration
* biller pancreatitis
* upper laparatomy
* any ventral hernia repair
* chronic systemic disease or
* with allergic attitude to any agent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara Mevki Military Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

MD. Mehmet SAYDAM (General Surgeon)

General Surgeon (M.D.)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Huseyin SINAN, Prof. M.D.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

VAN MILITARY HOSPITAL, GENERAL SURGERY DEPARTMENT, VAN, TURKEY

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Abd Ellatif ME, Askar WA, Abbas AE, Noaman N, Negm A, El-Morsy G, El Nakeeb A, Magdy A, Amin M. Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc. 2013 Jun;27(6):1896-906. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2625-5. Epub 2012 Dec 27.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 23269370 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GMMA-LEC-1648.4-70

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy:
NCT04107909 UNKNOWN NA