Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic Infiltration Versus Erector Spinae Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

NCT ID: NCT06684262

Last Updated: 2024-11-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

82 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-16

Study Completion Date

2024-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a commonly performed intra-abdominal surgical procedure all over the world. It may take an average of 4-5 weeks for patients to return to their pre-operative quality of life and standards after this surgery. Both Erector Spinae Plane Block and Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic Infiltration method are methods used to reduce postoperative pain. However, there is no study in the literature comparing these 2 methods in terms of postoperative recovery quality. In this study, patients will receive Erector Spinae Plane Block or Intraperitoneal Local Anesthetic Infiltration at the end of surgery, and both techniques will be compared using the preoperative and postoperative quality of recovery 40 survey.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Preoperative Quality of Recovery 40 questionnaire will be administered to patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy who consent to participate in the study. Following the surgical procedure, patients will receive either intraperitoneal local anesthetic infiltration or bilateral erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia. These interventions will be examined in an observational study comprising two distinct groups. At the 24-hour mark postoperatively, the Quality of Recovery 40 (QoR 40) survey will be readministered to the patients, and the outcomes will be subjected to comparative analysis. Throughout the postoperative period, patients in both cohorts will be closely monitored. Pain scores and opioid-associated adverse effects (such as nausea, vomiting, and pruritus) will be assessed at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 8th, 12th, and 24th hours. Subsequent to the surgical procedure, patients in both groups will be provided with morphine via patient-controlled analgesia, and the extent of opioid consumption within the first 24 hours postoperatively will be compared.

Primary purpose: To compare the effects of Erector Spina Plane (ESP) block and intraperitoneal local anesthetic infiltration on the quality of postoperative recovery in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Secondary objectives: To compare the effects of ESP block and intraperitoneal local anesthetic infiltration on postoperative pain scores at rest and with movement, total opioid consumption, and incidence of opioid-related side effects in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Quality of Recovery Postoperative Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group IPLA

Following the extraction of the gallbladder, the surgical team promptly administers a 45 mL local anesthetic solution blend consisting of 20 mL of bupivacaine at a concentration of 0.5%, 10 mL of lidocaine at a concentration of 2%, and 15 mL of 0.9% saline solution to the gallbladder bed and subdiaphragmatic region. This administration is performed via an aspiration catheter under direct visualization provided by the laparoscopic camera

No interventions assigned to this group

Group ESP

At the end of the operation and before tracheal extubation, patients will be turned into the lateral decubitus position. Bilateral erector spinae plane block will be applied at the T8 spinous process level. Under asepsis-antisepsis standards, a 12 mHz linear ultrasound probe will be placed approximately 3 cm lateral to the spinous process of the T8 vertebra in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation. After identification of the trapezius, rhomboid major, erector spinae muscles and transverse process, an aspiration test using an 80 mm peripheral nerve block needle, 22.5 ml of local anesthetic mixture (10 mL bupivacaine at 0.5% concentration, 5 mL lidocaine at 2% concentration, 7.5 mL 0.9% NaCl) will be applied bilaterally.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Will undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy operation,
* Patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Score (ASA-PS) of 1, 2 and 3 will be included.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients who do not give consent
* Those who are allergic to the drugs used in the research
* Those with coagulation disorders
* Having a history of alcohol and substance use
* Having a history of serious psychiatric and neurological diseases
* Having chronic pain syndrome
* Those with local infection in the area to be blocked
* Patients with sepsis and undergoing emergency surgery
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ankara University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Hakan Duzla MD

Research Assistant

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ankara University Faculty of Medicine

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024000006-4

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EOIB for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06656299 RECRUITING NA