Storybook Reading in Individuals With Down Syndrome

NCT ID: NCT03764761

Last Updated: 2022-04-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study uses mobile eye-tracking technology in order to characterize patterns of visual attention to communication supports, as well as a partner, within real world interactions for individuals with Down syndrome.

Visual communication supports are central components of what is termed augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention. AAC refers to the methods and technology designed to supplement spoken communication for people with limited speech. "Aided" AAC is a subcategory in which an external aid stores and presents for use visual symbols such as photographs, line drawings, or alphabet letters. The most traditional means of structuring aided AAC displays is to present the language concepts within row-column grids, which contain individual symbols/concepts placed in each grid square. The investigator's previous work investigated whether these grid-based presentations could be improved by understanding how different perceptual features of the displays influence responding (i.e., whether what the display looks like influences how easily the information on it is found). Individuals with developmental disabilities and children developing typically were faster and more accurate in finding information on some displays over others, when tested using a "visual search" task (aka, a "finding game" - "find the dog").

The previous investigations have evaluated visual attention within a setting that isolated visual processing of the AAC display as the primary dependent measure. However, communication requires attention not only to an AAC display, but also to a communication partner. Therefore, the current study seeks to examine questions of visual attention to both an AAC display and a communication partner. The investigators will manipulate characteristics of the structure of the display (e.g., arrangement of symbols), in order to determine if more optimal displays facilitate desirable patterns of visual attention to both the communication display and the partner. The mobile eye-tracking technology captures attention to both the display and the communication partner. The investigators anticipate that participants will be able to attend to their partner and the shared activity more when the AAC display is more optimal, but that when the AAC display is sub-optimal, the participants will have to spend more time examining the AAC display and less time in actual communication.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Visual supports are central components of what is termed augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention within speech-language pathology. AAC refers to the methods and technology designed to supplement spoken communication for people with limited speech. "Aided" AAC is a subcategory in which an external aid stores and presents for use visual symbols such as photographs, line drawings, or alphabet letters. Aided AAC relies on vision for access. If users cannot fully attend to, understand, or process the semantic information on a visual display, they are unlikely to use that display effectively. Regrettably, little research has focused on AAC display design variables that enhance attention

This research seeks to gain a greater understanding of visual attention to AAC displays and communication partners in order to further optimize display design. Eye tracking technology will reveal attention patterns that typically go unrecorded in behavioral research, particularly in individuals with severe disabilities. Specifically, eye tracking technology permits recording of the coordinates of where the participant is looking at any given time, how long they look, and what they ignore. This study seeks to record eye gaze via eye tracking during a shared book reading activity in which the AAC display is used for communication with a partner. It will help to determine whether optimal displays, which facilitate speed to locate targets and minimize fixations to distractors, will promote attention to the partner. Ultimately, this information will contribute to improving the design of materials for children with disabilities who require AAC.

The most traditional means of structuring aided AAC displays is to present the language concepts within traditional row-column grids, which contain individual symbols/concepts placed in each grid square. The investigator's earlier work examined whether these grid-based presentations could be improved by understanding how different perceptual features of the displays influence responding (ie, whether what the display looks like influences how easily the information on it is found). Individuals with developmental disabilities and children developing typically were faster and more accurate in finding information on some displays over others, when tested using a "visual search" task (aka, a "finding game" - "find the dog"). The next study then examined the reason behind this phenomenon by using eye tracking technology to examine how visual search itself was influenced by the different displays. Results indicated that in individuals with and without disabilities, in the non-optimal display there were significantly more fixations (looks) to non-relevant distractors than on the optimal display. Given that individuals with disabilities, including Down syndrome, are prone to ready distraction, the use of a display that by its very structure promotes looks to distractors seems to be a potentially critical mistake.

The current study examines the effects of adding a communication partner on the allocation of visual attention to optimally and non-optimally designed displays. This study is a translational step of moving from more basic research towards more clinically relevant research. Of interest are two questions: (1) How is a social partner integrated into the attentional field of the individual using AAC, in general, and (2) What is the effect of the introduction of the partner/social communication task on the patterns of attention across different display conditions?

Participants who have participated in the earlier research of the PI will be contacted to see if they would like to return for this one. Participants who express interest in learning more will be sent the phone/email information, the recruitment flyer and, if they request it, the consent form. If after reading these the participants are still interested, scheduling will begin.

First, during the assessment, participants will be assessed with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test - Fourth Edition (PPVT-4), which is an assessment of receptive vocabulary skills. It is the gold standard in both speech and language assessments as well as research, for estimating vocabulary size. In this, the child is shown four pictures at a time, and asked to choose one of them on the basis of the spoken word. The test continues until the child makes more than 8 errors in a set of 12. The test takes generally about 20 minutes to complete.

After the assessment portion is completed, participants will return for up to five additional sessions to undergo the storybook reading portion of the study. Each visit will involve reading two separate books with a trained research assistant and should last about 30 minutes. Before reading the books, the research assistant will conduct a preference assessment during which the participant will be given a choice of 4-6 possible sets of books that he/she will read over the length of the study. The participant will be provided with pictures of choices and can indicate their preferred choice by speaking, pointing to, or selecting their choice.

While participants are engaged in book-reading, they will also be wearing Tobii Pro eye tracking glasses that have an eye tracking device embedded within. It is ultra-lightweight glasses with a highly unobtrusive head unit. Mobile eye tracking goggles allow for recording of gaze path directly within the frames of glasses (similar to Google glasses). These mobile technologies enable visualization and analysis of allocation of visual attention during live social interactions, as the recording apparatus moves simultaneously with the movement of the participant's head and records the changing field of vision. The technology uses extremely low-level infrared light that is bounced off the pupil of the participant. The amount of infrared light is smaller than that found in the typical television remote and is far below federal safety requirements. The glasses include a non-invasive strap that will be tightened at the back to ensure the glasses stay in place when they are worn.

Prior to placing the glasses on the participant, the research assistant will follow a protocol to allow the participant to become familiar with the eye-tracking glasses. This will involve watching a short video that shows another person wearing the glasses. Then, the participant will be invited to place a pair of sunglasses on that has a strap similar to the eye-tracking goggles. The research assistant will tighten the strap and allow the child to wear the sunglasses for several minutes to become accustomed to the strap. Next, the participant will be fitted with the eye-tracking glasses. If the child wears prescription eye-glasses, the lenses in the glasses will be changed to match their prescription (there are multiple lenses that can be switched in or out of the glasses themselves), which will be obtained from the parents on the demographic form.

One the child is fitted with the eye-tracking glasses, the book reading will begin. The research assistant will read a book to the participant. The participant will be positioned in front of an AAC display that include symbols/messages to comment about the book. Each participant will undergo several sessions of book reading. The participant will interact with the partner during the book reading exchange by using an AAC display that contains symbols to comment about the book. The participant may use the AAC display by accessing it with a mouse or directly touching the symbols. The research assistant will follow a script that includes different types of questions directed towards the participant.

In between the two books read each session, the participant will be offered a snack, that is a snack approved by the parents/guardians prior to participation.

The sessions will be video recorded using a video camera. This will allow for post hoc review to ensure the fidelity of adherence to the script by the trained research assistant.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Down Syndrome Augmentative and Alternative Communication

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Within subjects alternating treatment design
Primary Study Purpose

DEVICE_FEASIBILITY

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

AAC Intervention

Participants will use AAC technology of different designs delivered on iMacs or Surface tablets

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

AAC Technology - Standard of Care

Intervention Type DEVICE

Story Book is separate from AAC symbols, AAC symbols are arranged on a grid with color backgrounds. This is non-optimal arrangement and non-integrated presentation

AAC Technology - non-optimal integrated arrangement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Story Book is integrated on to the AAC display together with the AAC symbols, AAC symbols are arranged on a grid with color backgrounds. This is non-optimal arrangement and but integrated presentation

AAC Technology - non-optimal integrated arrangement

Intervention Type DEVICE

Story Book is integrated on to the AAC display together with the AAC symbols, AAC symbols are arranged on a grid with color backgrounds. This is optimal arrangement and but integrated presentation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

AAC Technology - Standard of Care

Story Book is separate from AAC symbols, AAC symbols are arranged on a grid with color backgrounds. This is non-optimal arrangement and non-integrated presentation

Intervention Type DEVICE

AAC Technology - non-optimal integrated arrangement

Story Book is integrated on to the AAC display together with the AAC symbols, AAC symbols are arranged on a grid with color backgrounds. This is non-optimal arrangement and but integrated presentation

Intervention Type DEVICE

AAC Technology - non-optimal integrated arrangement

Story Book is integrated on to the AAC display together with the AAC symbols, AAC symbols are arranged on a grid with color backgrounds. This is optimal arrangement and but integrated presentation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Standard of Care Non-optimal, integrated Optimal, integrated

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Participants with Down syndrome who have receptive language age estimates between 3;0 -7;0 years as measures on the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test- 4th Edition (PPVT-IV; Dunn \& Dunn, 2006) and chronological ages of 7 to 35 years.

Exclusion Criteria

* We will exclude anyone outside the range of 7-35 years, inclusive. We will plan to exclude those having: (1) uncontrolled seizures; (2) sensory or peripheral impairment that might impair performance; (3) co-morbid illnesses with implications for central nervous system function.
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Penn State University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Krista Wilkinson

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Krista Wilkinson, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Penn State

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

11 Ford Building

University Park, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01HD083381-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

Storybook

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Stimulus-Stimulus Pairing Study
NCT02464527 COMPLETED NA
Hear Me Read 2021 Clinical Trial
NCT05245799 UNKNOWN NA
Stuttering and Neuromodulation
NCT07222163 RECRUITING NA