Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
406 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-08-01
2019-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
In-Hospital Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Aged Acute Medical Patients
NCT01506180
Quality of Life Assessment and Practice Support System in Home Care Services for Older Adults
NCT02940951
Trajectories of Quality of Life by the Elderly in Early Phase of Dementia
NCT02845830
Factors Influencing Home Nursing Care Service
NCT07099508
PROSENIOR. Prevention of Pressure Ulcers, Malnutrition, Poor Oral Health and Falls Among Older Persons Receiving Municipal Health Care and Are Registered in the Quality Registry Senior Alert
NCT05308862
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Elderly persons who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate during their admission. Written information about this study will be handed from the nurse in the ED. If the elderly accept she/he will get further oral information from the researcher. Written consent will be obtained if the elderly wish to participate.
Including patients from three different EDs will presumably provide a broad selection, with elderly persons who live both in the city and in rural areas and thereby representing a general sample of the Danish population.There may be a variation in cause of hospitalization related to seasonal changes. To present a broad selection, the inclusion period will involve summer, fall, and winter. Inclusion and all structured interviews will be performed during admission by two persons: the responsible researcher and a research assistant.
Primary Outcome:
The primary outcome QoL will be accessed and evaluated by the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life - direct weighting (SEIQoL-DW).
Exposure:
Homecare: Receiving "personal" homecare for more than 2 hours per week. Furthermore numbers of hours of homecare a week will be registered for each participant to see if there is any difference in QoL connected to number of hours.
Readmission: Readmissions 30 days after discharge from the primary index admission (yes/no). Readmission is defined as; an unscheduled hospitalization for any reason and where the patient has stayed at the hospital overnight within 30 days after discharge from the index admission.
The outcomes and variables will be collected through;
At a structured interview during hospitalization; The Ph.D student and the research assistant are responsible for conducting the interviews. The patients will at the interview be asked about; Aspect and index score of QoL, cognitive functioning (OMC score), marital status, length of education and social support.
In the patients' records during hospitalization; The Ph.D student is responsibility for collecting following information in the patients' record; Last admission, hours of homecare, use of home nursing, primary reason for hospitalization and comorbidities. Patients will be asked specific for permission to access journal data. Variables from the patients' record will be extracted after the informed consent for participation is obtained. The information from the journal will be handled from health professionals in the ED.
In the patients' record 30 days after discharge; Variables after 30 days will be counted from the discharge form the index admission. The Ph.D student is responsibility for collecting the information in the patient record about readmission and length of hospital stay under the same terms as described above.
Instrument
The primary outcome QoL are accessed and evaluated by SEIQoL-DW which are assessed in a structured interview. First the interviewer elicits five areas of life considered most important by the participant. Secondly, the participant rates the level each of these areas from worst possible to best possible on a visual analogue scale (SEIQoL - VAS) and thirdly the participant is asked for the relative importance of each area by a direct weighting (DW) procedure. The DW procedure uses a pie chart consisting of five coloured segments. Each colour represents an area chosen by the respondent. The areas can be adjusted in size to reflect the relative importance of each area (greatest importance is the largest pie area). The total value of all five segments equals 100. To calculate the participants QoL at the moment, each area will be divided by 100. By multiplying the level of the area by the weight for each area and adding up the values for each area, a SEIQoL-DW index score will be calculated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Elderly patients acutely admitted
Elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 year) admitted to emergency departments at the Hospital of Southern Jutland or Odense University
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients known or believed to be cognitively impaired as assessed by the OMC test (score \> 18 point).
* Patients who only receive outpatient treatment in the ED will be excluded
* Patients with an inadequate understanding of written and spoken Danish (assessed by the health professionals at the ED).
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Southern Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Mette Elkjær
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Southern Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital of Southern Jutland
Aabenraa, The Region of Southern Denmark, Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Elkjaer M, Primdahl J, Mogensen CB, Brabrand M, Gram B. The quality of life of older adults acutely admitted to the emergency department: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2022 Jul;9(4):2130-2138. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1223. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SHS-ED-06-2018
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.