Quality of Life Among Acute Admitted Elderly

NCT ID: NCT03762941

Last Updated: 2020-09-02

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

406 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-01

Study Completion Date

2019-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Elderly dependent on homecare, admitted acutely, are fragile. The aim of this study is to investigate the difference in the definition and rating of Quality of Life (QoL) among acute admitted elderly i) with and ii) without homecare background.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study is designed as a cross sectional study and will be conducted at three Emergency Departments (ED) within the Region of Southern Denmark; Hospital of Southern Jutland, Hospital of Southwest Jutland and Hospital Lillebaelt. The study method is based on a QoL questionnaire preformed as a structured interview with elderly who are acutely admitted in an ED.

Elderly persons who meet the inclusion criteria will be invited to participate during their admission. Written information about this study will be handed from the nurse in the ED. If the elderly accept she/he will get further oral information from the researcher. Written consent will be obtained if the elderly wish to participate.

Including patients from three different EDs will presumably provide a broad selection, with elderly persons who live both in the city and in rural areas and thereby representing a general sample of the Danish population.There may be a variation in cause of hospitalization related to seasonal changes. To present a broad selection, the inclusion period will involve summer, fall, and winter. Inclusion and all structured interviews will be performed during admission by two persons: the responsible researcher and a research assistant.

Primary Outcome:

The primary outcome QoL will be accessed and evaluated by the Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life - direct weighting (SEIQoL-DW).

Exposure:

Homecare: Receiving "personal" homecare for more than 2 hours per week. Furthermore numbers of hours of homecare a week will be registered for each participant to see if there is any difference in QoL connected to number of hours.

Readmission: Readmissions 30 days after discharge from the primary index admission (yes/no). Readmission is defined as; an unscheduled hospitalization for any reason and where the patient has stayed at the hospital overnight within 30 days after discharge from the index admission.

The outcomes and variables will be collected through;

At a structured interview during hospitalization; The Ph.D student and the research assistant are responsible for conducting the interviews. The patients will at the interview be asked about; Aspect and index score of QoL, cognitive functioning (OMC score), marital status, length of education and social support.

In the patients' records during hospitalization; The Ph.D student is responsibility for collecting following information in the patients' record; Last admission, hours of homecare, use of home nursing, primary reason for hospitalization and comorbidities. Patients will be asked specific for permission to access journal data. Variables from the patients' record will be extracted after the informed consent for participation is obtained. The information from the journal will be handled from health professionals in the ED.

In the patients' record 30 days after discharge; Variables after 30 days will be counted from the discharge form the index admission. The Ph.D student is responsibility for collecting the information in the patient record about readmission and length of hospital stay under the same terms as described above.

Instrument

The primary outcome QoL are accessed and evaluated by SEIQoL-DW which are assessed in a structured interview. First the interviewer elicits five areas of life considered most important by the participant. Secondly, the participant rates the level each of these areas from worst possible to best possible on a visual analogue scale (SEIQoL - VAS) and thirdly the participant is asked for the relative importance of each area by a direct weighting (DW) procedure. The DW procedure uses a pie chart consisting of five coloured segments. Each colour represents an area chosen by the respondent. The areas can be adjusted in size to reflect the relative importance of each area (greatest importance is the largest pie area). The total value of all five segments equals 100. To calculate the participants QoL at the moment, each area will be divided by 100. By multiplying the level of the area by the weight for each area and adding up the values for each area, a SEIQoL-DW index score will be calculated.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Quality of Life

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Elderly patients acutely admitted

Elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 year) admitted to emergency departments at the Hospital of Southern Jutland or Odense University

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients (aged ≥ 65 year) admitted to EDs at the Hospital of Southern Jutland, Hospital of Southwest Jutland or Hospital Lillebaelt

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients unable to give informed consent to participate
* Patients known or believed to be cognitively impaired as assessed by the OMC test (score \> 18 point).
* Patients who only receive outpatient treatment in the ED will be excluded
* Patients with an inadequate understanding of written and spoken Danish (assessed by the health professionals at the ED).
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Southern Denmark

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Mette Elkjær

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Southern Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital of Southern Jutland

Aabenraa, The Region of Southern Denmark, Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Elkjaer M, Primdahl J, Mogensen CB, Brabrand M, Gram B. The quality of life of older adults acutely admitted to the emergency department: A cross-sectional study. Nurs Open. 2022 Jul;9(4):2130-2138. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1223. Epub 2022 Apr 30.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35488717 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SHS-ED-06-2018

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.