mNGS vs Culture Critically Ill Patients

NCT ID: NCT03760315

Last Updated: 2022-08-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

210 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

mNGS is popular in research and recently it has been used clinically to detect microbes in the blood or other secretion in infected patients for quicker ,broad and accurate detection of microbes. In ICU ,patients are critically ill and need quicker and accurate antibiotics use to stop the pathologic process. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the positive detection rate of pathogens in patients with sepsis by metagenomic full-targeted detection technology was higher than that in blood culture, and to determine whether the pathogens found in patients with sepsis by metagenomic full-targeted detection technology were important for clinical development. Anti-infective regimens can help.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Sepsis patients in ICU were took blood culture sample and blood sample for mNGS test (IDSeqTM Ultra, Combing with Metagenomics and Pathogen/AMR/VF Probe Enrichment). Clinicians use their knowledge and experience to decide antibiotics use with the guide of Culture results or mNGS results. Validation with digital droplet PCR assays when metagenomic full-targeted assays identify pathogens not identified in conventional blood cultures The difference between the positive rate of mNGS and the positive rate of blood culture were recorded. Patient were followed at least 28 days after enrollment or an outcome indicator. Possible scenarios for detecting clinical impact were detected. Etiology, biochemical indicators, immune function, infection indicator, secondary infection, SOFA score and length of stay,outcome were recorded.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Sepsis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Sepsis

All enrolled patients

blood mNGS (IDSeqTM Ultra); blood Culture

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

take blood samples for mNGS and Culture at the same time in sepsis patients. No intervention on the treatment of the patients.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

blood mNGS (IDSeqTM Ultra); blood Culture

take blood samples for mNGS and Culture at the same time in sepsis patients. No intervention on the treatment of the patients.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Age \> 18years admit to ICU Meet the Sepsis 3.0 diagnostic criteria and suspected bloodstream infection, and the diagnosis of Sepsis ≤ 24 hours; Estimated ICU stay ≥ 24 hours; Informed consent;

Exclusion Criteria

Severe organ dysfunction, expected death within 72 hours; Receive palliative care; Refuse to participate;
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Southeast University, China

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ling Liu

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Haibo Qiu, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Southeast University, China

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Nanjing Zhong-Da Hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

ling liu, MD

Role: CONTACT

13851435472

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Ling Liu, MD.

Role: primary

86-25-83272201

Haibo Qiu, PhD.,MD.

Role: backup

86-25-83272200

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Sun Q, Teng R, Shi Q, Liu Y, Cai X, Yang B, Cao Q, Shu C, Mei X, Zeng W, Hu B, Zhang J, Qiu H, Liu L. Clinical implement of Probe-Capture Metagenomics in sepsis patients: A multicentre and prospective study. Clin Transl Med. 2025 Apr;15(4):e70297. doi: 10.1002/ctm2.70297.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40181528 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20181127

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.