Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
44 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-04-01
2020-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Low-add Multifocal vs. Monofocal IOLs
NCT03749161
Evaluation of Visual Acuity and Patient Satisfaction With AT LISA TRI 839MP Intraocular Lenses
NCT01731743
Comparison Between Bilateral Multifocal Intraocular Lenses and Pseudophakic Monovision
NCT02155348
Clinical Study to Compare Visual Performance of Two Trifocal IOLs
NCT03347981
Visual Performance of an Extended Depth of Focus IOL in an Emmetropic or Monovision Modality
NCT06624826
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The option commonly used to achieve spectacle independence are multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs). Multifocal IOLs either use a refractive or diffractive design or a combination of both or segmented asymmetric optics. The principal of the refractive design is based on changing the route of light rays by thickness, curvature and optical density of the lens. The principal of diffractive design is based on scattering of light rays when passing an edge in the material of the lens. One potentially negative aspect of multifocal refractive IOLs is pupil size dependence, another is loss of light energy to higher order diffraction which is not useful to the patient. In clinical studies diffractive lenses resulted in a better outcome in terms of optical quality, better contrast sensitivity and lens photopic phenomena (dysphotopsia such as halos and glare) than in refractive lenses.
Until recently multifocal lenses were typically bifocal with a focus assigned to near and a focus assigned to far vision. However, the intermediate working distance is poorly covered by that multifocal design. Since objects commonly viewed in this distance include computer displays and tablets, the intermediate distance has become a crucial part in daily life. As a consequence of poor intermediate visual acuity there is a need for spectacles for intermediate vision. Variations in the addition of power chosen for near vision provided some intermediate visual acuity but still suboptimal.
Therefore, a new concept of multifocality has been recently introduced, i.e. the trifocal lens. Trifocal lenses provide three focal distances, far, intermediate and near. This ideally results in even less spectacle dependence, including computer work. There are currently 3 trifocal designs available and are being used readily. One potential disadvantage of trifocal compared to bifocal IOLs is that near vision may be slightly poorer with the need for reading glasses with prolonged fine near work.
A slightly modified trifocal design has been recently introduced, that appears to have even better near vision than other trifocal designs as well as the potential for less dysphotopsia with a dilated pupil such as during the night.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Trifocal IOL
The patients will receive two different diffractive trifocal IOLs in each eye (AT Lisa tri vs. Rayner trifocal) during cataract surgery
Cataract surgery
During cataract surgery patients will be implanted with the AT Zeiss Lisa tri in one eye and the Rayner trifocal in the contralateral eye
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cataract surgery
During cataract surgery patients will be implanted with the AT Zeiss Lisa tri in one eye and the Rayner trifocal in the contralateral eye
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Scheduled for bilateral cataract extraction
* Motivated to be less spectacle dependant
* Age 21 and older
* Corneal astigmatism ≤ 1.5 D (Keratometry, IOL Master 700)
* written informed consent prior to recruitment
Exclusion Criteria
* Retinitis pigmentosa
* Chronic uveitis
* Amblyopia
* Pupil decentration \> 1mm center shift
* preceded retinal surgery
* preceded Laser-in-situ-Keratomileusis (LASIK)
* Any ophthalmic abnormality that could compromise visual function or the measurements
21 Years
105 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS)
Vienna, , Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Trifocal
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.