Visual Performance of an Extended Depth of Focus IOL in an Emmetropic or Monovision Modality
NCT ID: NCT06624826
Last Updated: 2024-10-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-10-01
2026-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Visual Function of Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses
NCT07262021
Low-add Multifocal vs. Monofocal IOLs
NCT03749161
Comparison of 2 Diffractive Trifocal IOLs
NCT03748381
Comparison of Two Non- Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses
NCT06607848
Myopic Monovision: EDOF vs. Monofocal IOL
NCT05194670
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The option commonly used to achieve spectacle independence at intermediate distance (e.g., PC work) is the implantation of enhanced depth of focus (EDOF) IOLs. These IOLs have an extended far focus area which reaches to the intermediate distance, providing high-quality vision over a continuous range of focus, rather than distinct foci with blur in between. In the last years several technologies for EDOF IOLs appeared on the market. The spectrum ranges from small aperture design, bioanalogic design, to diffractive and non-diffractive optics. The disadvantage compared to monofocal lenses in all the technologies mentioned is the potentially worse distance vision and contrast sensitivity as well as dysphotopsia.
A new refractive EDOF lens segment with an extended depth of vision was introduced which promises an increased range of functional vision and less dysphotopsias compared to diffractive EDOF lenses. These non-diffractive IOLs are believed to be a presbyopia correcting alternative for people with existing corneal or macula pathologies, which would preclude them from receiving premium lenses because of the loss of light in the diffractive process. To increase spectacle independence for these patients, IOLs may be used in a monovision modality, with an offset of up to 1.5dpt. This method showed good results in the literature so far for monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses.
Aim of the study is to compare a new non-diffractive EDOF-IOL, namely the PureSee, set for emmetropia or monovision.
120 eyes of 60 patients will be included into this study. Patients will be either randomized in the emmetropia or the monovision group
Follow-up visits will be 1 week after each surgery and 3 months post-surgically. During these visits, the clinical variables to be assessed will be visual acuity, stereopsis, contrast sensitivity, and binocular defocus curves.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
PureSee Emmetropia
Patient will receive the PureSee IOL with an emmetropic modality
Emmetropic modality
PureSee IOL, emmetropic modality
PureSee Monovision
Patient will receive the PureSee IOL in a monovision modality
Monovision modality
PureSee IOL, monovision modality
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Emmetropic modality
PureSee IOL, emmetropic modality
Monovision modality
PureSee IOL, monovision modality
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 21 or older
* Visual acuity \> 0.05
* Axial length: 21.00-27.00mm
* Normal findings in the medical history and physical examination unless the investigator considers an abnormality to be clinically relevant
* Written informed consent prior to surgery
Exclusion Criteria
* Relevant other ophthalmic diseases such as pseudoexfoliation syndrome (PEX)
* Irregular astigmatism on corneal tomography
* Pronounced dry eye disease
* Previous ocular surgery or trauma
* Persons who are pregnant or nursing (pregnancy test will be taken in women of reproductive age)
21 Years
105 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Prim. Prof. Dr. Oliver Findl, MBA
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Oliver Findl, Prim. Prof. Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery (VIROS)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Vienna Institute for Research in Ocular Surgery
Vienna, Austria, Austria
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PureSee MiniMonovision
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.