Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
72 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-14
2020-11-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of ZEISS AT LISA TRI AND TRI TORIC IOL
NCT02770924
Clinical Investigation of Visual Function After Bilateral Implantation of Two Presbyopia-Correcting Trifocal Intraocular Lenses (IOL)
NCT02691741
Comparison of 2 Diffractive Trifocal IOLs
NCT03748381
Visual Outcome, Cylinder Correction and Patient Satisfaction After Implantation of AT LISA Tri Toric 939MP Intraocular Lenses
NCT02985723
Evaluation of Visual Acuity and Patient Satisfaction With AT LISA TRI 839MP Intraocular Lenses
NCT01731743
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this retrospective/prospective, non-randomized study, subjects will receive either binocular implantation of AT LARA/AT LARA toric or AT LARA/AT LARA toric in the distance dominant eye and AT LISA tri/AT LISA tri toric in the non-dominant eye. The main outcome parameter is best corrected visual acuity (CDVA). Secondary outcome parameters are: preferred near and intermediate distance, UDVA, DCIVA (Salzburg Reading desk in preferred distance), DCNVA (Salzburg Reading Desk in preferred near distance), distance corrected intermediate and near visual acuity with different contrast settings (Salzburg Reading Desk), manifest refraction, monocular and binocular defocus curve analysis, dysphotopsia simulation (Halo \& Glare Simulator), subjective patient satisfaction (MacAlinden) questionnaire.
Patients have different demands for intermediate and near vision as well as distances needed for daily routine. Comparing both groups indicates there is individual lens fitting for patients depending on their own needs. Subjects are to be evaluated 2-4 months and 5-8 months after implantation of either configuration.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Binocular EDOF IOL
Binocular EDOF IOL for treatment of cataract
AT LARA IOL
EDOF IOL for treatment of cataract
Combined Edof and Trifocal IOL
Combined EDOF and Trifocal IOL - EDOF in the distance dominant eye / Trifocal in the non-dominant eye
AT LARA IOL
EDOF IOL for treatment of cataract
AT LISA Tri IOL
Trifocal IOL for treatment of cataract
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
AT LARA IOL
EDOF IOL for treatment of cataract
AT LISA Tri IOL
Trifocal IOL for treatment of cataract
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18 and older
* Uncomplicated implantation of study IOLs
* No visual acuity limiting pathologies
* Clear intraocular media
* Availability, willingness and sufficient cognitive awareness to comply with examination procedures
* Written informed consent for participation in the study and data protection
Exclusion Criteria
* Postoperative CDVA \>0.2 log MAR
* Visual field loss which has impact on visual acuity
* Use of systemic or ocular medication that might affect vision
* Acute or chronic disease, illness, ocular trauma or surgery that would confound results (e.g. macular degeneration, cystoid macular edema, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, etc.)
* Patients with amblyopia, strabismus, forme fruste keratoconus or keratoconus
* Capsular or zonular abnormalities that have affected postoperative centration or tilt of the lens (e.g. pseudoexfoliation syndrome)
* Pupil abnormalities (non-reactive, tonic pupils, abnormally shaped pupils, or pupils that do not dilate at least 3.5 mm under mesopic/scotopic conditions)
* Patient participates in other clinical trial (former participation is no exclusion criterion)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Carl Zeiss Meditec AG
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Florian Kretz
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Augentagesklinik Rheine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hellerup Øjenklinik
Hellerup, , Denmark
Goethe University
Frankfurt, , Germany
Augentagesklinik Rheine
Rheine, , Germany
Cathedral Eye Clinic
Belfast, , Ireland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moore J, Ostergaard J, Kretz F. Visual performance and patient preference with bilateral implantation of an extended depth of focus or combined implantation of an extended depth of focus/trifocal intraocular lens. Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 14;44(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-03030-y.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
GPAS-LARALISA-2018-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.