Ocular Biomarkers for Successful Premium Trifocal Intra-ocular Lenses Implantation
NCT ID: NCT05863247
Last Updated: 2023-05-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
154 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-01-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Visual Acuity and Patient Satisfaction With AT LISA TRI 839MP Intraocular Lenses
NCT01731743
Long-term With a Trifocal Intraocular Lens
NCT04861909
Clinical Investigation of Visual Function After Bilateral Implantation of Two Presbyopia-Correcting Trifocal Intraocular Lenses (IOL)
NCT02691741
Visual Outcome, Cylinder Correction and Patient Satisfaction After Implantation of AT LISA Tri Toric 939MP Intraocular Lenses
NCT02985723
Clinical Outcomes After Bilateral Implantation of ZEISS AT LISA TRI AND TRI TORIC IOL
NCT02770924
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon done by standard phacoemulsification with in-the-bag IOL placement. Patients had both eyes operated within a week.
Patients were assessed at day 1, 6, and month 3 after surgery. Six months post-operatively, refraction and slit-lamp examination was performed, and patients asked to complete the patient reported outcome questionnaire that evaluates visual satisfaction, spectacle independence and dysphoptsia like-symptoms.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
pseudophakic patients with post-operative dysphotpsias
Patients who report dyshoptsias after bilateral in-the-bag implantation of a trifocal intra-ocular lens (AT LISA 839mp)
Patient Reported Outcomes / Biometric data revision
Multivariate statistical analysis will be done to identify the reported biomarkers to characterize patients into the following categories: satisfied without dysphotopsias, unsatisfied with dysphotopsias, satisfied with dysphotopsias, unsatisfied without dysphotopsias.Main outcome measures will be photic phenomena at 6 months of follow-up in correlation with the following pre-surgical parameters: macular ganglion cell complex thickness and/or total ocular and corneal higher-order aberrations (coma, trefoil, spherical aberration). Patients with known contributing factors for the development of dysphotopsias (such as residual refractive error, IOL decentration, posterior capsular opacification) will be excluded from the analyzis.
pseudophakic patients without post-operative dysphotpsias
Patients who don't report dyshoptsias after bilateral in-the-bag implantation of a trifocal intra-ocular lens (AT LISA 839mp)
Patient Reported Outcomes / Biometric data revision
Multivariate statistical analysis will be done to identify the reported biomarkers to characterize patients into the following categories: satisfied without dysphotopsias, unsatisfied with dysphotopsias, satisfied with dysphotopsias, unsatisfied without dysphotopsias.Main outcome measures will be photic phenomena at 6 months of follow-up in correlation with the following pre-surgical parameters: macular ganglion cell complex thickness and/or total ocular and corneal higher-order aberrations (coma, trefoil, spherical aberration). Patients with known contributing factors for the development of dysphotopsias (such as residual refractive error, IOL decentration, posterior capsular opacification) will be excluded from the analyzis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Patient Reported Outcomes / Biometric data revision
Multivariate statistical analysis will be done to identify the reported biomarkers to characterize patients into the following categories: satisfied without dysphotopsias, unsatisfied with dysphotopsias, satisfied with dysphotopsias, unsatisfied without dysphotopsias.Main outcome measures will be photic phenomena at 6 months of follow-up in correlation with the following pre-surgical parameters: macular ganglion cell complex thickness and/or total ocular and corneal higher-order aberrations (coma, trefoil, spherical aberration). Patients with known contributing factors for the development of dysphotopsias (such as residual refractive error, IOL decentration, posterior capsular opacification) will be excluded from the analyzis.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients that want to have good vision most of the time without glasses at all distances
* Highest limit of mesopic pupil of 6 mm
* Corneal total higher-order aberration (HOA) ≤ 0.5 μm
* Angle kappa ≤ 0.58 mm
* Absence of cornea ectasia diagnostic criteria.
Exclusion Criteria
* Ocular comorbidities such as corneal, retinal or optic nerve disease
* Previous ocular surgeries
* Patients with unreal post-surgical visual expectations
* Patients with known mild cognitive impairment or dementia.
45 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital dos Lusíadas
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Guilherme Neri Pires
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Guilherme Pires, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital dos Lusíadas
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital dos Lusíadas
Lisbon, , Portugal
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HdosLusiadas
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.