A Comparison of the Visual Performance of Trifocal Versus Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses
NCT ID: NCT03726606
Last Updated: 2018-10-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
36 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-11-05
2019-05-06
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Statistical analysis
All data will be analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) v23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Graphs will be made using SPSS and Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA). Normality will be tested for using the Shapiro Wilk test. If the data is normal, an independent t test will be used for comparing the continuous variables between the groups. If the data is not normal, then we will utilize the Mann Whitney U test.
Sample size calculation
The sample size calculation was based on the mean binocular Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UNVA) tested at 40cm under photopic condition. A previous study on the same diffractive trifocal IOL revealed a binocular UNVA of 0.01 ± 0.087 logMAR (12). The anticipated mean value for Mini Well Toric Ready is 0.10 logMAR. Based on these assumptions, an alpha of 0.05 and power of 0.8, it was calculated a number of 15 patients implanted bilaterally for each group. Assuming a dropout rate of 20% on the primary outcome measure, this resulted in a total number of 36 bilateral patients, 18 each group.
Duration of the project: Six months to one year
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Extended depth of focus intraocular lens
Bilateral implantation of extended depth of focus intraocular lenses.
Intraocular lens
Bilateral implantation of the same intraocular lens.
Trifocal intraocular lens
Bilateral implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses.
Intraocular lens
Bilateral implantation of the same intraocular lens.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Intraocular lens
Bilateral implantation of the same intraocular lens.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Has bilateral cataracts with visual problems
* Is motivated for vision correction
Exclusion Criteria
* Pseudoexfoliation syndrome
* Zonular weakness
* Retinal or corneal dystrophies
* Retinal pathologies like age related macular degeneration
* History of trauma
* History of ocular surgery
* Individuals having trouble understanding written or spoken language
* Those with dense cataracts causing problems with optical biometry
* Average corneal powers outside the range of 41 diopters (D) to 46 D
* Corneal astigmatism \> 0.75 D
* Irregular astigmatism index of 0.54 or higher
30 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
SIFI SpA
INDUSTRY
Hashmanis Foundation
UNKNOWN
Hashmanis Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sharif Hashmani, FCPS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hashmanis Hospital
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HASH00011
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id