Genetic Evaluation for Medication Selection (GEMS) Study
NCT ID: NCT03736057
Last Updated: 2019-10-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
40 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2016-05-13
2018-08-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Genetic Characterization of Dementia
NCT01867359
Using Pharmacogenetics to Identify Patients With Polypharmacy at Risk of Medication Adverse Effects
NCT03748355
Genetic Characterization of Movement Disorders and Dementias
NCT02014246
A Genetic Study for Alzheimer Dementia: Case-control Study
NCT06330155
Genetic Studies of Early-onset Dementia
NCT04906863
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Additionally, investigators will explore the use of the NIH-sponsored Patient Reported Outcomes measurement Information System (PROMIS) as an outcome measure for BPSD. PROMIS is a system of highly reliable, valid, flexible, precise, and responsive assessment tools that measure patient-reported health status. PROMIS measures are available for typical BPSD like anger, anxiety, and depression, but their utility has not been studied in a sample of dementia patients. They offer the potential, through patient-portal EHR interfaces, for clinicians to track treatment responses in a more timely and efficient manner than traditional clinic-based instruments, placing less burden on patients and families to present for in-clinic assessments.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Delayed results of pharmacogenomic results
1:1 randomization schedule for delayed knowledge of pharmacogenomic results to clinician and patient. Results are released to prescriber at \<1 week (unblinded) or 12 weeks (blinded). When genomic results are available upon receipt, unblinded clinicians select an FDA-approved drug from the "recommended" drugs when possible. Blinded prescribers provide the intended prescription when notified of blinded status. At 4 weeks, 1° outcome measures, NPI-Q and side effects ratings are collected. Clinicians make a GO/NO-GO decision for continuation based on those measures. A NO-GO decision is unblinding and an alternative drug may be prescribed. At 12 weeks, 1° outcomes are collected again. Previously blinded clinicians will be unblinded and may decide to continue or revise the treatment plan based on the clinical outcomes and the genetic results. After the 12 week visit, results of the genetic tests will be entered in the EHR. Further clinical follow-up is based on need.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Have a caregiver/informant/family member who spends at least 10 hours per week with the affected person and who is willing to participate
3. Be rated by a caregiver/informant as scoring ≥9 on the Functional Activities Questionnaire, including at least one domain score of 3 (dependent).
4. Have BPSD sufficient for the treating clinician to begin or change psychotropic drugs, and of sufficiently mild severity that a delay of 5 days before changing the prescription would not be harmful to the patient.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Lack of reliable informant with adequate exposure to patient and ability to communicate with study staff in English
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
David Geldmacher
Professor of Neurology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David Geldmacher, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB-150902001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.