#CuttingCRC: Barbershop-Based Trial & Colorectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03733197
Last Updated: 2024-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-31
2024-02-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Researchers will compare the culture-specific intervention with a control arm, where barbers provide their client an evidenced-based American Cancer Society brochure on colorectal cancer screening to understand if barbers peers using MI and culturally relevant messaging better overcome masculinity barriers to medical care than the barber using the brochure alone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Engaging Black Men in Colorectal Cancer Screening
NCT05980182
A Smartphone-Based Intervention to Improve Colorectal Cancer Screening in African American Men
NCT06052202
Interventions to Improve Colon Cancer Screening in Poor Rural Iowa Counties
NCT01477814
Colorectal Cancer Screening Intervention Study
NCT06424197
Colorectal Screening Strategies in Underserved Populations
NCT05107661
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigator will conduct research in the metro areas of Salt Lake City (Salt Lake City-Provo-Orem) of Utah; Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota; Columbus, Ohio; and Milwaukee, Wisconsin. African American men's CRC screening rates in UT and Wisconsin are substantially lower than in other states, and the aforementioned metro regions have the largest population of African-Americans in each state. Approach. The investigator proposes a multi-stage mixed methods study (Figure 1), beginning with an exploratory sequential design validating the items for subsequent use in a pilot mixed methods intervention to accomplish aims. For Aim 1 (Years 1-2), the investigator collected and analyzed QUALitative data from 2 sources - focus groups and cognitive interviews - to validate and test a culture-specific scale of masculinity barriers to medical care among African-American men (hereafter called the Masculinity Barriers to Care Scale, MBCS). Next, the investigator administered the MBCS as an online QUANTtitative survey with the target population to evaluate the association between scale scores and CRC screening uptake. For Aim 2 (Years 3-6), the investigator will consider existing evidence-based approaches (e.g., motivation interviewing), the integrated results (QUAL + QUANT) from Aim 1 regarding masculinity barriers to care, and community input to design a novel, culture specific, behavioral intervention - one aimed at increasing CRC screening uptake (fecal immunochemical test; FIT) among African-American men and feasible for delivery in barber shops. The investigator will pilot test the peer intervention in a two-arm cluster randomized intervention (6 barbershops, randomized by site-2 shops in each state, specifically, Wisconsin, Ohio, and Minnesota) to account for differences in barbershop culture and reduce contamination. The primary outcomes for the pilot are recruitment, sample size estimation, preliminary efficacy, and acceptability. The investigator will also conduct post-intervention interviews with participants from both arms to evaluate acceptability (i.e., why and how each arm was or was not successful).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Culture specific
The culture-specific arm "may" entail FIT kits plus barbers as motivational interviewers.
Culture Specific
We anticipate the culture-specific arm developed minimally will include two core components: barbers as motivational interviewers, and (2) fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits distributed by barbers. If we choose this route for the culture-specific arm, preliminary data from our barbers suggest I teach the barbers the MI technique using content that stems from Aim 1 findings. Additional components for this arm may be developed during the APEASE process.
Control
Distribution of CRC screening brochures \& FIT (Fecal Immunochemical Test) kits by barbers
Control
the (control) arm will include an informational CRC screening brochure developed by the American Cancer Society plus a FIT kit distributed by the barbers.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Culture Specific
We anticipate the culture-specific arm developed minimally will include two core components: barbers as motivational interviewers, and (2) fecal immunochemical test (FIT) kits distributed by barbers. If we choose this route for the culture-specific arm, preliminary data from our barbers suggest I teach the barbers the MI technique using content that stems from Aim 1 findings. Additional components for this arm may be developed during the APEASE process.
Control
the (control) arm will include an informational CRC screening brochure developed by the American Cancer Society plus a FIT kit distributed by the barbers.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Aim 1A: men who 1) self-identified as non-Hispanic Black/African American, 2) were born in the US; 3) were between ages 45-75; 4) had a working telephone; 5) spoke and understood English; \& 6) resided in Utah, Ohio, or Minnesota.
* Aim 1B: men who 1) self-identified as non-Hispanic Black/African American, 2) were born in the US; 3) were between ages 45-75; 4) had a working telephone; 5) spoke and understood English; 6) resided in Utah, Ohio, or Minnesota; \& 7) had a phone with internet capabilities.
Exclusion Criteria
* Aim 1A: men who 1) did not self-identify as non-Hispanic Black/African American, 2) were not born in the US; 3) were not between ages 45-75; 4) did not have a working telephone; 5) did not speak and understand English; \& 6) did not reside in Utah, Ohio, or Minnesota.
* Aim 1B: men who 1) did not self-identify as non-Hispanic Black/African American, 2) were not born in the US; 3) were not between ages 45-75; 4) did not have a working telephone; 5) did not speak or understand English; 6) did not reside in Utah, Ohio, or Minnesota; \& 7) did not have a phone with internet capabilities.
\[Phase 2\]
Inclusion: For Aim 2, our pilot intervention Eligibility Criteria \& Recruitment includes 60 non-Hispanic Black/African-American male participants who: 1) have never completed CRC screening; 2) are 45-75 years old; 3) were born in the U.S.; 4) reside in Minnesota, Ohio, or Wisconsin; 5) have a telephone with internet, and 6) speak English. As a feasibility intervention, sample size is not based on the power to detect a certain effect size. Rather, n = 60 (30 per arm) was chosen based on practical considerations (e.g., cost, recruitment). With the assistance of barbers and culture-specific marketing materials, we will recruit at least five participants per week from six intervention participation sites (barbershops).
\[Phase 2\]
Exclusion: For Aim 2, our pilot intervention Eligibility Criteria \& Recruitment excludes men who are not Non-Hispanic Black/African-American as well as those who: 1) have never completed CRC screening; 2) are not 45-75 years old; 3) were not born in the U.S.; 4) do not reside in Minnesota, Ohio, or Wisconsin; 5) do not have a telephone with internet, and 6) do not speak English.
45 Years
75 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical College of Wisconsin
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Charles R. Rogers
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charles R Rogers, PhD, MPH, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical College of Wisconsin
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rogers CR, Okuyemi K, Paskett ED, Thorpe RJ Jr, Rogers TN, Hung M, Zickmund S, Riley C, Fetters MD. Study protocol for developing #CuttingCRC: a barbershop-based trial on masculinity barriers to care and colorectal cancer screening uptake among African-American men using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 24;9(7):e030000. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030000.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
00113679
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.