Large-Scale Online Studies of Early Motor Skill Learning
NCT ID: NCT03733080
Last Updated: 2025-04-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2529 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-09
2019-10-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Our goal is to gain insight into early human motor skill learning by carrying out online substudies using online crowd-sourcing tools.
Objective:
To learn more about motor behavior in a large group of people using motor tasks, and questions.
Eligibility:
Adults ages 18 and older based in the U.S. who speak English
Design:
Participants will be recruited from a crowd-sourcing website like Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Participants will do online tasks. They can use their own computers anywhere with Internet access. They will not need to directly interact with researchers.
Participants will be asked for general data, like their age and gender. No personally identifiable data will be collected.
Participants will see a list of tasks on their computer screen. They will be able to choose tasks they wish to do. They will get a description of the experiment, how long it takes, and how much compensation they will get.
Participants will complete on their screen a motor behavioral task, a cognitive task, and/or a questionnaire. For example, they may be asked to press sequences of numbers on the keyboard or move the mouse when a stimulus appears on the screen. Experiments may last up to 1 hour.
Participants can complete as many experiments as they wish. They can quit at any point.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Aging on Cortical Excitability and Motor Learning
NCT03750903
Motor Language Learning
NCT03223090
Brain Changes Associated With Learning a Motor Task
NCT00076466
Neural Mechanisms of Motor and Cognitive Networks
NCT02828813
Improving Postural Control Through Innovative Stimulation of the Proprioceptive System
NCT05367791
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our overall goal in this protocol has been to gain insight into early motor skill learning (micro-learning) in large-scale healthy volunteer cohorts using online crowd-sourcing. We have used a simple keyboard typing task to study micro-offline performance improvements during early motor skill learning. This online approach limits the burden on participants (who perform tasks in the comfort of their homes instead of traveling to NIH) and substantially reduces burden on in-house human, financial and technical resources. Results from this protocol contribute to a better understanding of factors relevant to human motor skill learning, with important implications for the design of better motor learning and neurorehabilitative strategies after brain lesions. We had completed data collection for four aims under this protocol at the time we were informed by the NIH IRB that they determined this to be a thematic protocol (September 23, 2019).
The four specific aims addressed under this protocol are:
1. Aim 1. To validate a motor skill learning task previously used by our group in lab-based studies {Bonstrup, 2019 #36} within an online, crowd-sourcing platform.
2. Aim 2. To compare the influence of an interfering task applied during early ("early interference") vs late ("late interference") rest periods on motor learning, thus evaluating resistance to interference, a feature of consolidation.
3. Aim 3. To evaluate the effects of a shorter practice period duration (i.e. - 5s vs. previously studied 10s duration) on micro-offline motor learning to gain insight into the impact of fatigue-related factors on learning.
4. Aim 4. To evaluate the effects of randomly variable practice period durations between 5-10s in length on micro-offline gains
As instructed, the purpose of this amendment is to request authorization to proceed with data analysis and publication. No new experiments will be carried out under this protocol.
Study Population:
U.S.-based English speakers aged 18 and above were recruited under this minimal risk protocol. Participants completed an online task in the comfort of their own homes using the internet, and did not need to directly interact with the investigators. All participants were given an anonymized random ID by the on-line site. We did collect general demographic information including age (needed to determine elegibility), and gender, race and ethnicity (per IRB reporting requirements, i.e. - Cumulative Inclusion Enrollment Report). However, we did not collect personally identifiable information (PII) about the participants.
Design:
Under this protocol, we have conducted experiments supporting four aims using Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT). All experiments consisted of a brief keyboard typing task where participants were asked to repeatedly type a 5-key sequence (4-1-3-2-4) as fast and as accurately as possible for several seconds (i.e. - practice trial). Each practice trial was followed by a rest period lasting several seconds. Following the task, participants completed a short questionnaire designed to query compliance with task instructions, and collect general demographic data required for IRB reporting. The average total time for participation across all experiments was approximately 20 minutes.
Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome measures for the keyboard typing task were correct sequence typing speed and typing accuracy. Microlearning scores were derived by quantifying the speed change between the end of a previous practice trial and the beginning of the subsequent one (micro-offline learning) and the speed difference between the beginning and end of the same practice trial (micro-online learning). Information from the questionaires related to task instruction compliance was primarily used to exclude data from further analysis if needed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
ages 18 and older
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
120 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Leonardo G Cohen, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
19-N-N012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: secondary_id
999919012
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.