A Clinical Study to Compare MAR-CUTIS With Dermabond Advanced

NCT ID: NCT03688880

Last Updated: 2020-08-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

107 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-30

Study Completion Date

2019-09-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This was a randomized, open-label, multicenter, comparator-controlled clinical study to compare MAR-CUTIS with Dermabond Advanced in closure of surgical incisions and lacerations less than or equal to (\<=)15 centimeter (cm). Eligible participants were randomized 2:1 to MAR-CUTIS or Dermabond Advanced.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Wounds and Injuries Lacerations Surgical Incision

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Dermabond Advanced

Dermabond Advanced (a topical skin adhesive) was applied on Day 0. Dermabond Advanced was applied in 1 continuous layer onto a dry wound through painting motions; the wound was held for 60 seconds to allow for complete polymerization.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Dermabond Advanced

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dermabond Advanced was applied in 1 continuous layer onto a dry wound through painting motions, taking care not to apply adhesive between the wound edges.

MAR-CUTIS

MAR-CUTIS (polyurethane-based skin adhesive) was applied on Day 0. MAR-CUTIS was applied in 1 to 2 millimeter (mm) thick layer ensuring that at least 1 cm of the glue is applied over the length of the wound on each side; the wound was held for approximately 30 seconds to allow for initial polymerization.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MAR-CUTIS

Intervention Type DEVICE

MAR-CUTIS was applied in 1 to 2 mm thick layer, ensuring that at least 1 cm of the glue was applied over the length of the wound on each side. The amount of the glue applied was calculated such that one 5-mL syringe covers approximately 8 cm of wound length (giving a total of 10 cm per syringe). For wounds \>8 cm, 2 syringes were required.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MAR-CUTIS

MAR-CUTIS was applied in 1 to 2 mm thick layer, ensuring that at least 1 cm of the glue was applied over the length of the wound on each side. The amount of the glue applied was calculated such that one 5-mL syringe covers approximately 8 cm of wound length (giving a total of 10 cm per syringe). For wounds \>8 cm, 2 syringes were required.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Dermabond Advanced

Dermabond Advanced was applied in 1 continuous layer onto a dry wound through painting motions, taking care not to apply adhesive between the wound edges.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For participants with surgical incisions:

1. Participants underwent closure of surgical incision 6 to 15 centimeters (cms) following laparotomy, abdominal hysterectomy, or laparoscopic intervention.

For participants with lacerations:
2. Participants requiring closure of a laceration on face (avoiding the immediate area around the eye) or extremities. In participants with multiple lacerations, one was selected as the target wound (i.e., greatest length and meets the study entry criteria).

For all participants:
3. Participant had given written informed consent/assent to participate.
4. Male and female participants at least 2 years of age and body weight 10 kilogram (kg) or greater.
5. Participants willing and capable of following instructions for wound care provided by the investigator and agreeing to return for all treatment control visits specified in this clinical study.

Exclusion Criteria

For participants with lacerations:

1. Wounds on mucosal surfaces or across mucocutaneous junctions (e.g., oral cavity, lips, eyes).
2. Wounds which might be regularly exposed to body fluids or with dense natural hair (e.g., scalp); wounds on ears.
3. Wounds on palms and feet.
4. Animal or human bites.
5. Lacerations that were heavily contaminated.
6. Punctured or crushed wounds.
7. Participants with lacerations having wound treatment more than 6 hours after the trauma.

For all participants:
8. Participants requiring suturing with sutures greater than 5 mm thickness.
9. Participants with documented skin disease or skin conditions (e.g., excessive hair at the site of surgery, scar tissue, wound, tattoo, coloration, or pre-existing open sores at the site of surgery that would interfere with the application of Investigational Medical Device or the skin assessment, as judged by the investigator).
10. Participant with any factors that might had an adverse effect on wound healing (e.g., previous history of keloid formation or hypertrophy \[as well in the family\]), history of immunosuppression, chronic systemic infection, or poor general health.
11. Participants with known blood clotting disorders.
12. Participants receiving steroids, immunosuppressants, chemotherapy, or anticoagulants.
13. Participants having known or suspected allergy or sensitivity to polyurethane, cyanoacrylates, formaldehyde, tapes or adhesives, or benzalkonium chloride.
14. Participant participating in any current clinical study with a non-CE ("Conformitee Europeene") marked device or investigational product.
15. Participant who was pregnant or breastfeeding.
16. Participant with history of a significant dermatologic disease or condition, such as atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, lichen ruber planus, vitiligo or conditions known to alter the skin appearance or physiologic response (e.g., decompensated diabetes mellitus, porphyria) that involves the investigative site.

Removal of Participants From Therapy or Assessments:

Only participants that were withdrawn from the study due to product failure at the time of application were replaced.

Participants might stop the study for any of the following reasons:

1. Participant request.
2. Use of non-permitted concurrent therapy.
3. Lost to follow-up (considered lost to follow-up only before Day 10).
4. Occurrence of adverse events not compatible with the continuation of participant participation in the study, in the investigator's opinion, or unacceptable to the participant to continue.

* Investigator request.
* Inter-current illness.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Syneos Health

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Grünenthal GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Study Director

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Grünenthal GmbH

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

004 - CHU Amiens-Picardie

Amiens, , France

Site Status

005 - Hôpital Privé Paul d'Egine

Champigny-sur-Marne, , France

Site Status

010 - Charité Berlin

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

006 - Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

009 - Klinikum Magdeburg

Magdeburg, , Germany

Site Status

001 - Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

022 - Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

003 - University Hospital Virgen del Rocío

Seville, , Spain

Site Status

019 - Barnsley Hospital

Barnsley, , United Kingdom

Site Status

017 - Birmingham Children's Hospital

Birmingham, , United Kingdom

Site Status

018 - Bristol Royal Hospital for Children

Bristol, , United Kingdom

Site Status

021 - University Hospital of Wales

Cardiff, , United Kingdom

Site Status

013 - The Princess Alexandra Hospital

Harlow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

011 - Leeds Teaching Hospitals

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

016 - St George's Hospital

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

014 - Queen Elizabeth the Queen Mother Hospital

Margate, , United Kingdom

Site Status

020 - Royal Gwent Hospital

Newport, , United Kingdom

Site Status

012 - Peterborough City Hospital

Peterborough, , United Kingdom

Site Status

015 - Musgrove Park Hospital

Taunton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France Germany Spain United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1012937

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

KF7021-04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Evaluating MMPs in Burns
NCT03148977 TERMINATED