An Analysis of Dermabond vs. Non-Absorbable Sutures in Skin Closure for Brow Ptosis Procedures

NCT ID: NCT05981443

Last Updated: 2025-04-24

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-08-15

Study Completion Date

2024-04-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare Dermabond with non-absorbable sutures in skin closure after brow ptosis surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:

* if Dermabond provides equivalent wound healing compared to conventional non-absorbable skin suture techniques
* if Dermabond provides equivalent scar appearance compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques
* if Dermabond results in equivalent complication rates compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques Participants will have be randomly selected to have either Dermabond or non-absorbable suture closure methods. Scar analysis and both participant and provider surveys will be performed to assess the differences between groups, if any.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Brow Ptosis Surgical Wound

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active Comparator: Dermabond

The surgical wound over one eyebrow will be closed with Dermabond.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dermabond

Intervention Type DEVICE

Use of Dermabond to close surgical incisions instead of non-absorbable sutures

Active Comparator: Non-Absorbable Sutures

The surgical wound over one eyebrow will be closed with non-absorbable sutures.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Non-Absorbable Sutures

Intervention Type OTHER

Use of conventional non-absorbable sutures to close surgical incisions

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dermabond

Use of Dermabond to close surgical incisions instead of non-absorbable sutures

Intervention Type DEVICE

Non-Absorbable Sutures

Use of conventional non-absorbable sutures to close surgical incisions

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients undergoing bilateral direct excision brow lift for brow ptosis at the University of Kentucky Medical Center.
* Patients \> 18 years of age.
* Patients must be able to follow up at the specified intervals.
* Patients who are able to give their own informed consent.
* Health Status: Variable health status reflective of general population of Kentucky. Patients will be healthy enough to be seen in an office setting.
* All patients will need to be proficient in the English language to understand the scale used for scar assessment

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients \<18 years of age or \>100
* Allergy to Dermabond
* Adults with impaired consent capacity
* Incarcerated individuals
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

100 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cody Blanchard

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Cody Blanchard

Resident Physician, Ophthalmology

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Timoney, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

University of Kentucky

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Kentucky

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BrowPtosis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.