An Analysis of Dermabond vs. Non-Absorbable Sutures in Skin Closure for Brow Ptosis Procedures
NCT ID: NCT05981443
Last Updated: 2025-04-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
8 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-08-15
2024-04-17
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* if Dermabond provides equivalent wound healing compared to conventional non-absorbable skin suture techniques
* if Dermabond provides equivalent scar appearance compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques
* if Dermabond results in equivalent complication rates compared to conventional non-absorbable suture techniques Participants will have be randomly selected to have either Dermabond or non-absorbable suture closure methods. Scar analysis and both participant and provider surveys will be performed to assess the differences between groups, if any.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Aesthetic Outcome of Layered Closure vs. Layered Closure Followed by 2-Octyl Cyanoacrylate
NCT05449457
Cosmetic Outcome Study of Lid Laceration Repair With Suture Versus Tissue Adhesive
NCT01918059
Use of 2-octylcyanoacrylate With Full-thickness Skin Grafts
NCT02550574
Comparison of Traditional Superficial Cutaneous Sutures Versus Steri-Strip Coaptive Film in Layered Dermatologic Closures
NCT01938586
HISTOACRYL: A Study of Its Efficacy in Final Scar Formation
NCT00890578
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active Comparator: Dermabond
The surgical wound over one eyebrow will be closed with Dermabond.
Dermabond
Use of Dermabond to close surgical incisions instead of non-absorbable sutures
Active Comparator: Non-Absorbable Sutures
The surgical wound over one eyebrow will be closed with non-absorbable sutures.
Non-Absorbable Sutures
Use of conventional non-absorbable sutures to close surgical incisions
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Dermabond
Use of Dermabond to close surgical incisions instead of non-absorbable sutures
Non-Absorbable Sutures
Use of conventional non-absorbable sutures to close surgical incisions
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients \> 18 years of age.
* Patients must be able to follow up at the specified intervals.
* Patients who are able to give their own informed consent.
* Health Status: Variable health status reflective of general population of Kentucky. Patients will be healthy enough to be seen in an office setting.
* All patients will need to be proficient in the English language to understand the scale used for scar assessment
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergy to Dermabond
* Adults with impaired consent capacity
* Incarcerated individuals
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cody Blanchard
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Cody Blanchard
Resident Physician, Ophthalmology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Timoney, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Kentucky
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BrowPtosis
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.