A Comparison of OASIS Wound Matrix With Approved Dressings for Skin Graft Donor Sites

NCT ID: NCT02994589

Last Updated: 2016-12-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators objective is to compare OASIS wound matrix with other commonly used dressings available for the donor site in split thickness skin grafting in order to determine which dressing provides the best outcome based on pain level, time to healing and aesthetic outcome.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Investigators seek to compare Oasis wound matrix with Tegaderm and Xeroform in order to determine whether advantages exist in one or more of the dressing types that are approved and currently used for split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings.

Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the three treatment groups and followed up post-operatively and treated as per current standard of care.

Data to be collected and analyzed includes: patient age, co-morbid illnesses, medication, skin-graft donor location, skin-graft donor area, STSG thickness, infection rate, complications involving the donor site, post-operative pain score every morning until hospital discharge, healing rate, photographs of the donor site immediately post-operatively and then at routine follow-up appointments.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Skin Graft Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OASIS® wound matrix

OASIS wound matrix is a biologic extracellular matrix derived from porcine small intestine submucosa. Some components of OASIS wound matrix are similar to human dermis including types of collagens, elastin, glycoproteins and proteoglycans. In addition, OASIS wound matrix retains some growth factors that have been suggested to aid in the wound healing process. It is a FDA approved wound dressing indicated for use in a variety of ulcers, abrasions and surgical wounds.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

OASIS® wound matrix

Intervention Type DEVICE

OASIS® Matrix is indicated for the management of wounds including: partial- and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, diabetic ulcers, trauma wounds (abrasions, lacerations, second-degree burns, skin tears), draining wounds, surgical wounds (donor sites/grafts, post-Mohs' surgery, post-laser surgery, podiatric, wound dehiscence).

Tegaderm™(Absorbant, 3M)

Transparent dressing allows for wound monitoring without changing the dressing Clear design takes the guesswork out of application over the wound Novel acrylic polymer pad technology designed to handle low to moderate wound drainage. No dressing breakdown in the wound. Low friction surface minimizes potential for friction and shear. Allows for gentle removal from skin. Barrier to external contaminants, body fluids, bacteria and viruses.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Tegaderm™(Absorbant, 3M)

Intervention Type OTHER

3M™ Tegaderm™ Dressing helps provide the natural moisture balance conducive to wound healing.

Xeroform™

Xeroform™ Occlusive Petrolatum Gauze. 3% Bismuth Tribromophenate in a special petrolatum blend on fine mesh gauze. Non-adherent. Clings and conforms to all body contours.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Xeroform™

Intervention Type OTHER

Xeroform™ consists of a fine-mesh gauze impregnated with bismuth tribromophenate.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tegaderm™(Absorbant, 3M)

3M™ Tegaderm™ Dressing helps provide the natural moisture balance conducive to wound healing.

Intervention Type OTHER

OASIS® wound matrix

OASIS® Matrix is indicated for the management of wounds including: partial- and full-thickness wounds, pressure ulcers, venous ulcers, chronic vascular ulcers, diabetic ulcers, trauma wounds (abrasions, lacerations, second-degree burns, skin tears), draining wounds, surgical wounds (donor sites/grafts, post-Mohs' surgery, post-laser surgery, podiatric, wound dehiscence).

Intervention Type DEVICE

Xeroform™

Xeroform™ consists of a fine-mesh gauze impregnated with bismuth tribromophenate.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients scheduled to undergo split thickness skin grafting
* patients able to consent without a proxy

Exclusion Criteria

* confounding medical conditions
* previous skin grafting from site
* prior use of biological skin substitute on site
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Loma Linda University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Subhas Gupta, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Loma Linda University

Hahns Kim, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Loma Linda University

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Mostow EN, Haraway GD, Dalsing M, Hodde JP, King D; OASIS Venus Ulcer Study Group. Effectiveness of an extracellular matrix graft (OASIS Wound Matrix) in the treatment of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Surg. 2005 May;41(5):837-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.042.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15886669 (View on PubMed)

Hankin CS, Knispel J, Lopes M, Bronstone A, Maus E. Clinical and cost efficacy of advanced wound care matrices for venous ulcers. J Manag Care Pharm. 2012 Jun;18(5):375-84. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2012.18.5.375.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22663170 (View on PubMed)

Eskes AM, Brolmann FE, Gerbens LA, Ubbink DT, Vermeulen H; REMBRANDT study group. Which dressing do donor site wounds need?: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2011 Oct 17;12:229. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-229.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 21999705 (View on PubMed)

Fernandes de Carvalho V, Paggiaro AO, Isaac C, Gringlas J, Ferreira MC. Clinical trial comparing 3 different wound dressings for the management of partial-thickness skin graft donor sites. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2011 Nov-Dec;38(6):643-7. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182349d2f.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 22011820 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

5150267

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id