Prospective Randomized International Study on the Reactivation of Burn Injuries
NCT ID: NCT04951934
Last Updated: 2022-07-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-31
2024-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The enrolled patients will have to be examined after 5 weeks of treatment, until complete healing and subsequently their scarring will have to be evaluated at 3 and 6 months after healing.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of the Cutaneous Reinnervation After Burn
NCT02356354
Efficacy of MySkin Patch for the Healing of Burn Wounds: a Randomised Controlled Trial
NCT01499264
Fractional Ablative Laser Treatment for Skin Grafts
NCT04176705
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Cytal® Burn Matrix in the Management of Partial-Thickness Burns to the Hand
NCT03598023
The Dermisgraft Epithelialization and Late Scar Healing
NCT05189743
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In deep burns, the surgical procedure of autologous skin transplant (autograft) is almost always the preferred way to induce a re-epithelization of the injured area. The coverage of a deep burn with the graft is -depending on the case case- immediate, delayed a few days after excision or late, after a first phase of direct scarring. Numerous are the types of surgery as well as the sites of skin removal.
The autologous graft, however, presents a not negligible probability of failure that leads to the total or partial detachment of the grafted skin; when this happens the healing process of the lesion (or a part of it) uncovered occurs by second intention but is not always easy to manage, as this process can be delayed or stopped by many factors. Known factors contributing to this are, for example, diabetes, infections, metabolic deficiencies and the advanced age of the subject, while others are still being studied.
Therefore, proper wound management and dressing after surgery, trauma or disease is an important part of the healing process, not only to prevent the onset of infections or other complications, but also to accelerate wound healing itself with as little scarring as possible.
This clinical study will be a multi-centric prospective, randomized controlled parallel group, superiority study, with the commercial objective of evaluating the clinical efficacy of a battery-powered portable device that uses blue LEDs. The Study aims, within the planned observation weeks, to clinically compare two groups of patients with deep burn injuries whose autologous skin graft has failed in part or totally. The objective is to determine any differences in outcome between the two groups considered and whether the therapy of the treatment group is a valid alternative to the current therapy in terms of reactivation and support of the reparative process, speed of healing and scarring.
Group 1, the "Control" group, will follow the standard treatment provided by the hospital protocol; Group 2, the "Treated" one, will follow the standard treatment provided by the hospital protocol to which is added the treatment with the EmoLED device, scheduled between the cleansing and the dressing.
The measurement of the difference in efficacy of the device between the two arms will be evaluated in terms of reactivation of the healing process, intended as the achievement of a re-epithelialization of at least 30%, speed (time) of healing and scarring (Vancouver scale).
The clinical trial in question aims, therefore, to investigate whether the group of patients undergoing standard therapy with, in addition, the treatment with EmoLED reaches a higher percentage of reactivations of the healing process than the one of the control group, subjected to standard treatment. If confirmed, this result would imply significant gains in terms of speeding up hospital stay for those patients where autologous grafts have not been successful, therefore also in terms of reducing public health expenditure, not to mention that, if the improvement of scarring results were confirmed in the Treated group, it would increase the quality of life of patients with burn scars which often significantly impact on this parameter.
The population subject of this trial is widely representative of the target population, as there are no particular exclusion criteria and the sites involved are structures of excellence in the treatment of burns and failed skin grafting areas.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EmoLED Group
The EmoLED Group will undergo treatment with EmoLED twice a week for 5 consecutive weeks. The therapy, in this case, in addition to the standard treatment, will also include a treatment with the EmoLED device.
EmoLED
This treatment consists of irradiation with the blue light emitted by the device for one minute on the injured area. If the wound has a greater extension than the irradiated area, multiple repeated applications will be performed on adjacent areas, until the entire wound is covered.
Standard treatment
The standard treatment consists of: cleansing and possible debridement of the wound, application of the topical treatment indicated for that phase of the wound, intended as the "standard of care" of the structure, and subsequent bandaging.
Control Group
The Control Group will follow the standard treatment indicated.
Standard treatment
The standard treatment consists of: cleansing and possible debridement of the wound, application of the topical treatment indicated for that phase of the wound, intended as the "standard of care" of the structure, and subsequent bandaging.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EmoLED
This treatment consists of irradiation with the blue light emitted by the device for one minute on the injured area. If the wound has a greater extension than the irradiated area, multiple repeated applications will be performed on adjacent areas, until the entire wound is covered.
Standard treatment
The standard treatment consists of: cleansing and possible debridement of the wound, application of the topical treatment indicated for that phase of the wound, intended as the "standard of care" of the structure, and subsequent bandaging.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The surface of the non-taken skin graft must be between 0.5% and 5.0% of the body surface;
* Men and women aged ≥ 18 years;
* The patient must be able to understand the purpose of the Clinical Study and provide their Informed Consent in writing.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients who are unable to understand the aims and the objectives of the study;
* Patients with burns with TBSA greater than 50%;
* Patients with a history of self-harm who can voluntarily alter the course of healing;
* Patients with psychiatric disorders;
* Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding (the state of pregnancy or breastfeeding will be certified on the basis of the patient's declaration);
* Patients with cancer;
* Patients with pathologies that induce photosensitization of the skin;
* Patients with limited life expectancy.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Emoled
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stefano Gasperini, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Medical Advisor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of Graz - Department of Surgery - Division of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Graz, , Austria
AO for emergency "Cannizzaro" - Big Burns Center
Catania, , Italy
Plastic Surgery - Centro Ustioni ASL3 Liguria - Hospital Villa Scassi
Genova, , Italy
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda
Milan, , Italy
AO Cardarelli - UOC Big Burns Center - Reconstructive Plastic Surgery
Napoli, , Italy
AOU Pisana - Sede di Cisanello - UO Burns Center
Pisa, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
EmoLED_Burn_001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.