Dosage of Plasma 1, 3-β-D-glucan for the Diagnosis of Candidemia.
NCT ID: NCT03674359
Last Updated: 2021-01-26
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
2000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-12-12
2022-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The dosage of BDG will be considered positive if the value is at least or equal to 80 pg/ml.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A B-D-Glucan Driven Antifungal Stewardship Approach for Invasive Candidiasis
NCT03090334
Performance Evaluation of the Fujifilm Wako Beta-D-glucan Technique in the Diagnosis of Major Invasive Fungal Infections (IFI)
NCT07272915
Negative Beta Glucan in ICU Patients
NCT01734525
β-D-Glucan (BDG) Surveillance With Preemptive Anidulafungin vs. Standard Care for Invasive Candidiasis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Patients
NCT00672841
Candida PCR Diagnosis Strategy in Patients From Intensive Care Units
NCT04874441
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A single positive blood culture is sufficient for diagnosis, but the sensitivity of blood cultures is only 50 to 70 percent. Clinical signs are unspecific and do not guide the diagnosis. If treatment started early, 12 hours after the 1st positive blood culture collection the mortality is 10%. Recently, the incidence of candidemia in intensive care unit has increased in France as in other countries as. From these different elements (frequency, mortality, early diagnosis, little specific clinical signs), it is easy to understand the approach that has prevailed for many years, which is to define the profile of the patients at risk of candidemia in intensive care unit. Currently, there are several predictive factors of occurrence of a candidemia in intensive care unit. They are represented by the index of colonization, very high risk factors (FTHR) and Candida score (CS).
Predictive factors of occurrence of candidemia have led to the concept of preemptive or empirical treatment, the aim is to being avoid the occurrence of candidemia.
However, the ability of these factors to predict the occurrence of a candidemia is not satisfactory, explaining in part the mortality rate.
In the light of current knowledge, including the predictive factors of occurrence of candidemia in intensive care patients, a better selection of patients likely to develop candidemia remains to this day, a crucial issue. Several teams have been interested in the evaluation of various bio-markers, including the (1,3) - β - D-glucan (BDG), to optimize decision-making in intensive care patients at risk of candidemia in front of:
* the increased frequency of candidemia,
* poorly discriminating predictive factors,
* no specific clinical signs,
* the low sensitivity of blood culture,
* and the impact of early treatment.
To clarify the role of BDG as a predictive factor of candidemia, all patients hospitalized in intensive care unit, meeting the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, will be followed, from day 4 of hospitalization or from the beginning of antifungal treatment between the admission in intensive care unit and day 4, until the exit of intensive care unit or until day30 of hospitalization in intensive care unit.
The dosage of BDG and blood cultures will be performed on day 4 of hospitalization or before the beginning of antifungal treatment between the admission in intensive care unit and the 4th day, then 3 times a week, until day 30.
A before the beginning of antifungal treatment between the admission to intensive care unit and the 4th day of hospitalization, then twice a week, maximum until day30.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cohort
Patients hospitalized in intensive care, meeting the inclusion criteria. BDG analysis
BDG analysis
BDG analysis
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
BDG analysis
BDG analysis
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients Under mechanical ventilation (MV), antibiotic (AB) And with a central venous catheter (CVK)
* inclusion at day 4 of hospitalization or from establishing of antifungal treatment between admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and day 4
* Affiliation to the social security system.
* Signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Patient whose inclusion life expectancy is less than 72 h
* Patient being treated for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP)
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
* Neutropenia: \< 500 nuclear neutrophil / mm3
* Patients under ECMO
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Philippe KAROUBI, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hopital Avicenne
Bobigny, , France
Hôpital Louis Mourier
Colombes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Philippe KAROUBI, Dr
Role: primary
Damien ROUX, Pr
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lortholary O, Renaudat C, Sitbon K, Madec Y, Denoeud-Ndam L, Wolff M, Fontanet A, Bretagne S, Dromer F; French Mycosis Study Group. Worrisome trends in incidence and mortality of candidemia in intensive care units (Paris area, 2002-2010). Intensive Care Med. 2014 Sep;40(9):1303-12. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3408-3. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Finding the "missing 50%" of invasive candidiasis: how nonculture diagnostics will improve understanding of disease spectrum and transform patient care. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(9):1284-92. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit006. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
Morrell M, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH. Delaying the empiric treatment of candida bloodstream infection until positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Sep;49(9):3640-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.9.3640-3645.2005.
Posteraro B, De Pascale G, Tumbarello M, Torelli R, Pennisi MA, Bello G, Maviglia R, Fadda G, Sanguinetti M, Antonelli M. Early diagnosis of candidemia in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a prospective comparison of (1-->3)-beta-D-glucan assay, Candida score, and colonization index. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):R249. doi: 10.1186/cc10507. Epub 2011 Oct 22.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
P170926J
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.