A B-D-Glucan Driven Antifungal Stewardship Approach for Invasive Candidiasis
NCT ID: NCT03090334
Last Updated: 2024-08-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
34 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-03-01
2019-06-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. discontinue antifungal treatment based on negative (\<80 pg/ml) result of 1,3 beta-d-glucan performed on day 0,3,6 and 10
2. continue antifungal treatment according with attending physician's decision.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Dosage of Plasma 1, 3-β-D-glucan for the Diagnosis of Candidemia.
NCT03674359
Evaluation of BD Glucan in Peritoneal Fluid for the Diagnosis of Fungal Peritonitis
NCT03469401
Beta-Glucan Driven vs. Empirical Antifungal Therapy in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03117439
Kinetics of Serum β-D-glucan During Peritonitis With Candida in Resuscitation
NCT03140748
β-D-Glucan (BDG) Surveillance With Preemptive Anidulafungin vs. Standard Care for Invasive Candidiasis in Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) Patients
NCT00672841
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Our objective is to establish whether a strategy based on beta-d-glucan (BG) assessment could achieve reduced antifungal consumption in patients with severe abdominal condition developing severe sepsis and septic shock without any impact on the outcome Secondary objectives i) Assess the accuracy of BG in the diagnosis of invasive candidiasis (IC) in in critically ill patients with a severe abdominal condition who develop severe sepsis or septic shock.
ii) Describe the changes over the time of BG value according with colonization status, infection or none the aforementioned events.
Material and Methods Study design: a multicenter, open label, randomized trial Population: all the patients with a severe abdominal condition who develop a severe sepsis or septic shock.
1. Inclusion Criteria:
1. adult (≥ 18 year) patients;
2. signed informed consent before surgical procedure;
3. severe sepsis or septic shock;
4. at least one of the following conditions: i) post-operative peritonitis, ii) recurrent gastrointestinal perforation, iii) post-operative hepatobiliary and/or pancreatic disorders including necrotizing pancreatitis, iv) post-operative intra-abdominal abscess, and v) anastomotic leak.
2. Exclusion criteria a. diagnosis of candidiasis before the enrollment b. exposure in the past 30 days to any antifungal treatment or diagnosis of invasive fungal infection; c. pregnancy or lactation; d. history of allergy to any of the antifungal drugs; e. major immunosuppression conditions including: i. neutropenia (\<0.5 × 109 neutrophils/L \[\<500 neutrophils/mm3\] for \>10 days), ii. receipt of an allogeneic stem cell transplant or solid organ transplantation, iii. inherited severe immunodeficiency (such as chronic granulomatous disease or severe combined immunodeficiency), iv. HIV infection with lymphocyte T CD4+ cell count \< 200/mmc. f. patients with poor prognosis or unable to sign informed consent.
Procedures Pre-randomization procedures
At the time of patient enrollment (within 24 h from onset of severe sepsis/septic shock), a standardized diagnostic work-up must be performed including at least:
i) two sets of blood cultures; ii) 5 surveillance cultures (rectal swab, urine culture, pharyngeal swab, axillary swab, groin swab).
iii) in case of re-intervention or percutaneous drainage: Gram stain and culture of intra-abdominal samples; iv) serum BG determination. Antibiotic and antifungal empirical therapy should be started immediately after collection of microbiological samples according with a predefined standard of care (see appendix 1). Once completed this procedures patients will proceed to randomization.
Randomization Patient eligible for the study after the beginning of antifungal therapy will be randomized 1:1 to receive (Group A) a BG driven de-escalation strategy or (Group B) a course of antifungal treatment based on the care provider's decision.
In both groups, if cultures yield invasive candidiasis (see below) the patient will be managed in according with guidelines and excluded from the per-protocol analysis.
In both groups, BG determination will be repeated at day +3, +6 and +10 after starting antifungal therapy.
Randomization will be carried out providing closed envelopes to the participating centers immediately before the study onset.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
De-escalation
In this group, investigators will manage the antifungal therapy according to the BG levels as follows:
1. antifungal therapy will be stopped immediately after the BG response in case of serum BG \<80 pg/ml in presence of clinical stability (CS);
2. antifungal therapy will be continued until further BG determination, both for BG levels between 80-200 pg/ml and for BG \<80 pg/ml in patients without CS. In these cases, if the following BG value is \<80 pg/ml antifungal therapy will be stopped independently from the CS achievement.
3. antifungal therapy will be continued until day 10 for BG levels \>200 pg/ml
De-escalation
Antifungal therapy will be stopped according with BG results
Standard of care
In this group antifungal treatment will be continued until clinician's decision.
Investigators will be blinded to the BG levels of patients enrolled in this arm, The BG results will be faxed directly to the coordinating center.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
De-escalation
Antifungal therapy will be stopped according with BG results
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Bologna
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Maddalena Giannella
MD
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Azienda Ospealiero Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bassetti M, Marchetti M, Chakrabarti A, Colizza S, Garnacho-Montero J, Kett DH, Munoz P, Cristini F, Andoniadou A, Viale P, Rocca GD, Roilides E, Sganga G, Walsh TJ, Tascini C, Tumbarello M, Menichetti F, Righi E, Eckmann C, Viscoli C, Shorr AF, Leroy O, Petrikos G, De Rosa FG. A research agenda on the management of intra-abdominal candidiasis: results from a consensus of multinational experts. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Dec;39(12):2092-106. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3109-3. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
Kollef M, Micek S, Hampton N, Doherty JA, Kumar A. Septic shock attributed to Candida infection: importance of empiric therapy and source control. Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):1739-46. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis305. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
Maubon D, Garnaud C, Calandra T, Sanglard D, Cornet M. Resistance of Candida spp. to antifungal drugs in the ICU: where are we now? Intensive Care Med. 2014 Sep;40(9):1241-55. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3404-7. Epub 2014 Aug 5.
Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Finding the "missing 50%" of invasive candidiasis: how nonculture diagnostics will improve understanding of disease spectrum and transform patient care. Clin Infect Dis. 2013 May;56(9):1284-92. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit006. Epub 2013 Jan 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BDG-ETHIC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.