VRT as a Biomarker of Cerebellar Dysfunction in Chronic Cannabis Use
NCT ID: NCT03662737
Last Updated: 2023-09-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
61 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-09-01
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The project aims to identify a sensitive and specific biomarker of cerebellum dysfunction in chronic cannabis users. The investigators would like to demonstrate that the visuomotor rotation paradigm is valid to measure and quantify such a dysfunction.
A longitudinal prospective study with a 3 month follow-up is proposed. 3 groups will be included: 1) chronic cannabis users; 2) individuals with an alcohol use disorder; and 3) healthy controls. All groups will be matched by sex and age. Forty individuals will be included in each group. Individuals will be assessed at baseline, at first month and at 3-months of follow-up. Sociodemographic and clinical data will be recorded. Information on cannabis consumption will be registered using an App.
Participants will do the visuomotor rotation task and answer three questionnaires: the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory, the Scale for the assessment and rating of ataxia (SARA) and the Harris tests for lateral dominance.
The biomarker developed by this project will facilitate the detection of cerebellar alterations in chronic cannabis users, and will permit to quantify and monitor such alteration over time. The team's intention is to patent the proposed model and disseminate it in order to use it in clinical practice at both primary and specialized health centres.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cerebellar Alterations in Individuals With a Cannabis Use Disorder
NCT02816034
Using Imaging to Assess Effects of THC on Brain Activity
NCT03655717
Imaging Cannabinoid CB1 Receptors in Alcohol Dependence
NCT00816439
The Neural Correlates of Cannabis Use
NCT03104257
Neuroscience of Alcohol and Marijuana Impaired Driving
NCT03431987
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 -Chronic cannabis use
Individuals between 18 and 50 years old who have been using at least 2 joints per day for at least 3 years. They should have used cannabis during the last 24h but not during the 3h prior to participation to the study and they should test positive for cannabis in their urine. Individuals with another substance use or severe mental disorder will be excluded (except tobacco use)
Visuomotor adaptation task
We will measure performance of the subjects of each group on the visuomotor adaptation task, especially in the rotation condition, in which a perturbation will be induced between the anticipated location of the hand and the provided visual feedback, and in the washout condition, in which the rotation will be removed. We expect that subjects with cannabis use disorder will not show the expected implicit motor adaptation to the perturbation and consequently no deterioration of performance on the task, due to cannabis-induced cerebellar damage. In other words, we want to show that this visuomotor task is a cheap and quick biomarker of cerebellar dysfunction in chronic cannabis users.
Group 2 - Alcohol dependence
Individuals between 18 and 50 years old diagnosed with alcohol use disorder according to DSM-V criteria and have been consuming alcohol for at least 3 years. Individuals who are diagnosed with another substance use or severe mental disorder will be excluded (except tobacco use).
Visuomotor adaptation task
We will measure performance of the subjects of each group on the visuomotor adaptation task, especially in the rotation condition, in which a perturbation will be induced between the anticipated location of the hand and the provided visual feedback, and in the washout condition, in which the rotation will be removed. We expect that subjects with cannabis use disorder will not show the expected implicit motor adaptation to the perturbation and consequently no deterioration of performance on the task, due to cannabis-induced cerebellar damage. In other words, we want to show that this visuomotor task is a cheap and quick biomarker of cerebellar dysfunction in chronic cannabis users.
Control Group
Individuals matched in gender and age with the experimental groups and with no diagnosis of substance use or severe mental disorder (except tobacco use)
Visuomotor adaptation task
We will measure performance of the subjects of each group on the visuomotor adaptation task, especially in the rotation condition, in which a perturbation will be induced between the anticipated location of the hand and the provided visual feedback, and in the washout condition, in which the rotation will be removed. We expect that subjects with cannabis use disorder will not show the expected implicit motor adaptation to the perturbation and consequently no deterioration of performance on the task, due to cannabis-induced cerebellar damage. In other words, we want to show that this visuomotor task is a cheap and quick biomarker of cerebellar dysfunction in chronic cannabis users.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Visuomotor adaptation task
We will measure performance of the subjects of each group on the visuomotor adaptation task, especially in the rotation condition, in which a perturbation will be induced between the anticipated location of the hand and the provided visual feedback, and in the washout condition, in which the rotation will be removed. We expect that subjects with cannabis use disorder will not show the expected implicit motor adaptation to the perturbation and consequently no deterioration of performance on the task, due to cannabis-induced cerebellar damage. In other words, we want to show that this visuomotor task is a cheap and quick biomarker of cerebellar dysfunction in chronic cannabis users.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Right-handed
* Daily consumption of cannabis for at least 2 years (cannabis group) or diagnosed Alcohol Use Disorder (alcohol group)
Exclusion Criteria
* Regular consumption of other drugs except nicotine
* Other Axis I or neurological diagnosis
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hugo López-Pelayo
MD, PhD, Head of Addiction Unit
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Antoni Gual, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hospital clinic Bracelona
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Clínic
Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hall W, Degenhardt L. Adverse health effects of non-medical cannabis use. Lancet. 2009 Oct 17;374(9698):1383-91. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61037-0.
Moore TH, Zammit S, Lingford-Hughes A, Barnes TR, Jones PB, Burke M, Lewis G. Cannabis use and risk of psychotic or affective mental health outcomes: a systematic review. Lancet. 2007 Jul 28;370(9584):319-28. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61162-3.
Silins E, Horwood LJ, Patton GC, Fergusson DM, Olsson CA, Hutchinson DM, Spry E, Toumbourou JW, Degenhardt L, Swift W, Coffey C, Tait RJ, Letcher P, Copeland J, Mattick RP; Cannabis Cohorts Research Consortium. Young adult sequelae of adolescent cannabis use: an integrative analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;1(4):286-93. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)70307-4. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
Batalla A, Bhattacharyya S, Yucel M, Fusar-Poli P, Crippa JA, Nogue S, Torrens M, Pujol J, Farre M, Martin-Santos R. Structural and functional imaging studies in chronic cannabis users: a systematic review of adolescent and adult findings. PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055821. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
Lorenzetti V, Solowij N, Yucel M. The Role of Cannabinoids in Neuroanatomic Alterations in Cannabis Users. Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 1;79(7):e17-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.11.013. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
Lorenzetti V, Solowij N, Fornito A, Lubman DI, Yucel M. The association between regular cannabis exposure and alterations of human brain morphology: an updated review of the literature. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(13):2138-67. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990435.
Crean RD, Crane NA, Mason BJ. An evidence based review of acute and long-term effects of cannabis use on executive cognitive functions. J Addict Med. 2011 Mar;5(1):1-8. doi: 10.1097/ADM.0b013e31820c23fa.
Bossong MG, Jager G, Bhattacharyya S, Allen P. Acute and non-acute effects of cannabis on human memory function: a critical review of neuroimaging studies. Curr Pharm Des. 2014;20(13):2114-25. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990436.
Broyd SJ, van Hell HH, Beale C, Yucel M, Solowij N. Acute and Chronic Effects of Cannabinoids on Human Cognition-A Systematic Review. Biol Psychiatry. 2016 Apr 1;79(7):557-67. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.12.002. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
Burns HD, Van Laere K, Sanabria-Bohorquez S, Hamill TG, Bormans G, Eng WS, Gibson R, Ryan C, Connolly B, Patel S, Krause S, Vanko A, Van Hecken A, Dupont P, De Lepeleire I, Rothenberg P, Stoch SA, Cote J, Hagmann WK, Jewell JP, Lin LS, Liu P, Goulet MT, Gottesdiener K, Wagner JA, de Hoon J, Mortelmans L, Fong TM, Hargreaves RJ. [18F]MK-9470, a positron emission tomography (PET) tracer for in vivo human PET brain imaging of the cannabinoid-1 receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 5;104(23):9800-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0703472104. Epub 2007 May 29.
Kishimoto Y, Kano M. Endogenous cannabinoid signaling through the CB1 receptor is essential for cerebellum-dependent discrete motor learning. J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 23;26(34):8829-37. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1236-06.2006.
Mazzoni P, Krakauer JW. An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation. J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 5;26(14):3642-5. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5317-05.2006.
Taylor JA, Klemfuss NM, Ivry RB. An explicit strategy prevails when the cerebellum fails to compute movement errors. Cerebellum. 2010 Dec;9(4):580-6. doi: 10.1007/s12311-010-0201-x.
Thames AD, Arbid N, Sayegh P. Cannabis use and neurocognitive functioning in a non-clinical sample of users. Addict Behav. 2014 May;39(5):994-9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.01.019. Epub 2014 Feb 6.
Taylor JA, Krakauer JW, Ivry RB. Explicit and implicit contributions to learning in a sensorimotor adaptation task. J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 19;34(8):3023-32. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3619-13.2014.
Stella N. Chronic THC intake modifies fundamental cerebellar functions. J Clin Invest. 2013 Aug;123(8):3208-10. doi: 10.1172/JCI70226.
Prashad S, Filbey FM. Cognitive motor deficits in cannabis users. Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2017 Feb;13:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.07.001.
Bastian AJ. Moving, sensing and learning with cerebellar damage. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2011 Aug;21(4):596-601. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TRV-CAN
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.