Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
56 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-06-01
2017-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of an Anti-spasmodic Suppository to Improve Comfort After Urologic Surgery
NCT02291042
Bisacodyl Use in the Post-operative Care of Obstetrical/Gynecological (OB/GYN) Patients
NCT01011426
Multimodal Analgesic Technique for Control of Post-laproscopy Abdominal Pain
NCT03241602
Comparison of the Effects of Fentanyl, Oxycodone, Butorphanol on Gastrointestinal Function
NCT04295109
Oliceridine on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT07026162
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Only the patients of clinical investigators from this trial were considered for participation in this study. Clinical investigators posting patients for total laparoscopic or robotic hysterectomy at Mercy Medical Center informed patients of the presence of the clinical trial at the time of surgical posting, using an IRB-approved script. The chart number of patients posted for total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy was be forwarded to the co-investigator by the clinic surgical coordinator at the time of surgical posting. The co-investigator reviewed each chart and conducted a telephone interview with each patient prior to surgery to verify trial eligibility and to answer any questions about the trial. Patients were made aware that study participation is voluntary, and that if they chose to not participate, they would receive standard postoperative pain and nausea pharmacologic management. On the day of surgery, a member of the research team met with the patient pre-operatively in a private pre-operative holding area to review and sign a written consent for participation in the trial. This member of the research team was familiar with the study protocol and risks of the pharmacologic intervention under investigation. These steps allowed patients to be fully informed, and ensured patient safety and support during the short interval of the study.
On the day of surgery, patients were randomized to either B\&O rectal suppository or to a placebo of glycerin rectal suppository. This study employed a glycerin rectal suppository as a placebo because this over-the-counter medication has limited effects, similar to those of a Belladonna \& Opium Supprette, and is similar in size, physical appearance and mechanical properties to a Belladonna \& Opium Supprette. A placebo-free comparison group was not used, as this would have changed the study design from a double-blind clinical trial to a single-blind clinical trial, with greater potential for investigator bias to influence study results. Additionally, it is not thought that results for a placebo-free comparison group would substantially differ from those of a glycerin suppository placebo group, and would require a larger study population and greater study resources to achieve findings of similar significance and power. Randomization was performed by a biostatistician, with a sealed envelope created for each patient containing information regarding randomization to either placebo or intervention group. In the operating room, this envelope was opened, and the circulating nurse would draw the indicated medication from the Pyxis system. Drug dictionary entries were created within the Pyxis system by the Mercy Medical Center Department of Pharmacy, so that the Belladonna \& Opium Supprette #16A (16.2mg / 60mg), and the glycerin suppository were represented as "Protocol Drug A" and "Protocol Drug B". The patient's electronic medical record reflected that "Protocol Drug A" or "Protocol Drug B" was received by the patient, so that the nurses and physicians caring for the patient postoperatively were blinded as to which suppository the patient received.
A suppository was placed rectally by a member of the surgical team at the conclusion of surgery, prior to departure from the OR and awakening from anesthesia. Post-operative placement was selected to minimize interaction with intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic medications, to maximize peak plasma concentrations and therapeutic efficacy of Belladonna alkaloids and Opium within the immediate postoperative period, and control for variation in procedure length between study participants. The nurses caring for the patient postoperatively were blinded to which suppository the patient did receive, but were made aware that the patient had received a suppository containing either glycerin or one containing belladonna 16.2mg and opium 60mg, equivalent to approximately 6mg of morphine. The nurses were be educated about potential side effects of Belladonna \& Opium suppositories, and of potential drug interactions; they were asked to document and to inform the covering provider of the occurrence of any such adverse effects. Patients remaining in the hospital overnight following their surgery underwent a postoperative exam by a resident physician familiar with the study protocol and familiar with potential side effects of the B\&O suppository. Standard of care at Mercy Medical Center is for nurses to assess patient's postoperative pain by visual analog scale at regular time intervals. Data regarding patients' visual analog pain scores for the first 12 hours following surgery were extracted from the electronic medical record and analyzed by the research team. PO and IV narcotic use in IV morphine equivalents, PO and IV NSAIDs, and PO and IV antiemetic use were also assessed over the first 12 following surgery, this data was extracted from the electronic medical record and analyzed by the research team. Study surveillance did not extend beyond the duration of the participant's postoperative hospitalization, usually less than 24 hours.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
B&O
29 women randomized to Belladonna \& Opium suppository
Belladonna Opium
Belladonna Opium 16.2-60mg rectal suppository
Placebo
27 women randomized to Glycerin suppository
Glycerin Suppository
Glycerine rectal suppository
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Belladonna Opium
Belladonna Opium 16.2-60mg rectal suppository
Glycerin Suppository
Glycerine rectal suppository
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* undergoing level I total laparoscopic or robot-assisted hysterectomy with or without bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, cystoscopy, lysis of adhesions, or surgical treatment of endometriosis
Exclusion Criteria
* additional surgical procedures being performed
18 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Maryland
OTHER
Anna Reinert
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anna Reinert
Study coordinator, Resident Physician
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin Audlin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Surgeon
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mercy Medical Center
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, and Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MMC 2015-63
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.