Effect of Opioid-Free Anesthesia (OFA) on Postoperative Pain and Perioperative Nausea and Vomiting in Elective Laparoscopic .

NCT ID: NCT07306910

Last Updated: 2025-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-12-30

Study Completion Date

2028-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

1. To evaluate the efficacy of a standardized multimodal Opioid Sparing (OS) protocol versus conventional opioid-based analgesia in reducing acute postoperative
2. To quantify opioid consumption reduction achievable through OS strategies
3. To assess the impact of OS on hemodynamic parameters during critical surgical phases
4. To compare recovery metrics (PONV, bowel function, ambulation)
5. To evaluate the safety profile of OS anesthesia

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The ongoing opioid crisis represents a significant public health challenge, with surgical prescriptions being a major contributor to chronic opioid use and misuse. Recent epidemiological data indicate that 4-6% of opioid- naïve patients develop persistent opioid use postoperatively, with laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients being particularly vulnerable due to moderate postoperative pain . Despite being a minimally invasive procedure, laparoscopic cholecystectomy consistently ranks among the most common general surgical procedures worldwide, with over 1 million performed annually in the United States alone. This frequency amplifies the population-level impact of postoperative prescribing patterns . Previous studies have demonstrated the efficacy of individual components-dexmedetomidine for hemodynamic stabilization, lidocaine infusions for visceral analgesia, and regional techniques like erector spinae plane (ESP) blocks-but their synergistic effects remain underexplored . A recent scoping review highlighted that while opioid-sparing (OS) effects are frequently reported, evidence for clinically meaningful outcomes (e.g., reduced ventilation time, accelerated functional recovery) remains limited . The pathophysiology of post-cholecystectomy pain involves both somatic (abdominal wall) and visceral (diaphragmatic irritation, biliary spasm) components, necessitating a multimodal approach. Opioids inadequately address inflammatory mediators while introducing risks of respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), ileus, and hemodynamic instability. Emerging evidence suggests that α-2 agonists (e.g., dexmedetomidine) and NMDA ant

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opioid-Free Anesthesia Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

opa

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Type of the study: Prospective, triple-blind, parallel-group, superiority block randomized controlled trial. Study Setting and design features.

• Allocation: Computer-generated 1:1 block randomization with allocation concealment (block size = 6), stratified by ASA status (I vs II/III).
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Outcome Assessors
Blinding: Participants, anesthetist/ clinicians obserevers and data analysts will be blinded to group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OpioidSparingGroup OS)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

opoid free anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Maintenance Dexmedetomidine 0.2-0.5 µg/kg/h + Lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h + Magnesium 10 mg/kg/h; Sevoflurane as required; Atracurium 0.1 mg/kg IV PRN

ControlGroup (CG)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

opoid free anesthesia

Intervention Type OTHER

Maintenance Dexmedetomidine 0.2-0.5 µg/kg/h + Lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h + Magnesium 10 mg/kg/h; Sevoflurane as required; Atracurium 0.1 mg/kg IV PRN

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

opoid free anesthesia

Maintenance Dexmedetomidine 0.2-0.5 µg/kg/h + Lidocaine 1.5 mg/kg/h + Magnesium 10 mg/kg/h; Sevoflurane as required; Atracurium 0.1 mg/kg IV PRN

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Lidocaine Dexmedetomidine Magnesium

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults aged 18 to 60 years scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Elective must be included in title.
* ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status I or II.
* Body Mass Index (BMI) \< 35 kg/m².

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic opioid use (\>30 MME/day for \>3 months).
* Contraindications to study medications (e.g., severe hepatic impairment; allergy/contraindication to lidocaine, dexmedetomidine, ketamine, fentanyl, or NSAIDs).
* Renal dysfunction (eGFR \<60 mL/min/1.73 m²).
* Significant cardiac conduction abnormalities.
* Pregnancy or lactation.
* Emergency surgery or conversion to open cholecystectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Galal Eldeen Hasan Hasan Hussein

resident at the anesthesia , icu and pain management department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ola Mahmoud Wahba Gnedy, Assistant Prof.

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 01151121981

Email: [email protected]

Mohamed Bakr Eid, prof

Role: CONTACT

Phone: 01223213370

Email: [email protected]

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://doi.org/10.1016/0952-8180(94)00001-K

Aldrete, J. A. (1995). The post-anesthesia recovery score revisited. Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, \*7\*(1), 89-91.

https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-DA-22-052.html

.National Institutes of Health. HEAL Initiative: Preventing Opioid Use Disorder After Surgery. NIH Guide NOT-DA-22-052. 2022.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(74)90884-8

. Huskisson, E. C. (1974). Measurement of pain. The Lancet, \*304\*(7889), 1127-1131.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

211198

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

211198

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id