Evaluation of VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module With External Processing Unit (EPU)

NCT ID: NCT03624881

Last Updated: 2023-07-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

333 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-04

Study Completion Date

2021-06-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prospective, non-randomized, post market clinical evaluation of the VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module with External Processing Unit (EPU) when used with STSF catheter and ST catheter compared to an historical control performance goal.

A maximum of 330 subjects will be enrolled across up to 45 sites. Two hundred eighty (280) enrolled subjects will be treated using the STSF catheter with EPU and 50 subjects will be treated using the ST catheter with EPU. Prior to enrollment, a few sites will be selected to only enroll subjects who will be treated with the ST catheter and the remaining sites will only enroll subjects who will be treated with the STSF catheter.

Bayesian adaptive design will be used to assess early success at up to two interims: one after all subjects have completed the 3- month follow-up assessment, and a second to occur after all subjects have completed the 6 months follow-up visit.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prospective, non-randomized, post market clinical evaluation of the VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module with External Processing Unit (EPU) when used with STSF catheter and ST catheter compared to an historical control performance goal.

A maximum of 330 subjects will be enrolled across up to 45 sites. Two hundred eighty (280) enrolled subjects will be treated using the STSF catheter with EPU and 50 subjects will be treated using the ST catheter with EPU. Prior to enrollment, a few sites will be selected to only enroll subjects who will be treated with the ST catheter and the remaining sites will only enroll subjects who will be treated with the STSF catheter.

Bayesian adaptive design will be used to assess early success at up to two interims: one after all subjects have completed the 3- month follow-up assessment, and a second to occur after all subjects have completed the 6 months follow-up visit.

The primary objective of this clinical investigation is to demonstrate the safety and 12-month effectiveness of Tag Index-guided ablation using the VISITAG SURPOINT™ Module with External Processing Unit when used with the THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® SF (STSF) and THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH® (ST) catheters for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in the treatment of subjects with drug refractory symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Specifically:

* To demonstrate the safety based on the proportion of subjects with early-onset (within 7 days of ablation procedure) primary adverse events
* To demonstrate the 12-month effectiveness based on the proportion of subject with freedom from documented atrial arrhythmia (atrial fibrillation (AF), atrial tachycardia (AT) or atrial flutter (AFL) episodes during the effectiveness evaluation period (Day 91-365)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

VISITAG SURPOINT Module with EPU

Subjects undergoing electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation with THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH ® SF (STSF) and THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH ® (ST) catheters with VISITAG SURPOINT Module with External Processing Unit for pulmonary vein isolation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Catheter ablation with EPU

Intervention Type DEVICE

Subjects undergoing electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation with THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH ® SF (STSF) and THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH ® (ST) catheters with VISITAG SURPOINT Module with External Processing Unit for pulmonary vein isolation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Catheter ablation with EPU

Subjects undergoing electrophysiology mapping and RF ablation with THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH ® SF (STSF) and THERMOCOOL SMARTTOUCH ® (ST) catheters with VISITAG SURPOINT Module with External Processing Unit for pulmonary vein isolation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Symptomatic paroxysmal AF who had at least one AF episode electrocardiographically documented within one (1) year prior to enrollment. Documentation may include electrocardiogram (ECG); Transtelephonic monitoring (TTM), Holter monitor or telemetry strip
2. Failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) (Class I or III antiarrhythmic drugs) as evidenced by recurrent symptomatic AF, or intolerable to the AAD
3. Age 18 years or older
4. Signed Patient Informed Consent Form (ICF)
5. Able and willing to comply with all pre-, post-, and follow-up testing and requirements

Exclusion Criteria

1. Previous surgical or catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation
2. Previous cardiac surgery (including CABG) within the past 6 months (180 days)
3. Valvular cardiac surgical/percutaneous procedure (i.e., ventriculotomy, atriotomy, and valve repair or replacement and presence of a prosthetic valve)
4. Any carotid stenting or endarterectomy
5. Documented LA thrombus on imaging
6. LA size \> 50 mm (parasternal long axis view)
7. LVEF \< 40%
8. Contraindication to anticoagulation (heparin or warfarin)
9. History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities
10. PCI/MI within the past 2 months (60 days)
11. Documented thromboembolic event (including TIA) within the past 12 months (365 days)
12. Rheumatic Heart Disease
13. Uncontrolled heart failure or NYHA function class III or IV
14. Severe mitral regurgitation (Regurgitant volume ≥ 60 mL/beat, Regurgitant fraction ≥ 50%, and/or Effective regurgitant orifice area ≥ 0.40cm2)
15. Awaiting cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery within the next 12 months (365 days)
16. Unstable angina
17. Acute illness or active systemic infection or sepsis
18. AF secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or reversible or non-cardiac cause.
19. Presence of implanted ICD/CRT-D.
20. Significant pulmonary disease, (e.g., restrictive pulmonary disease, constrictive or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) or any other disease or malfunction of the lungs or respiratory system that produces chronic symptoms.
21. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD; active requiring significant intervention not including OTC medication)
22. Significant congenital anomaly or medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude enrollment in this study.
23. Women who are pregnant (as evidenced by pregnancy test if pre-menopausal)
24. Concurrent enrollment in an investigational study evaluating another device, biologic, or drug.
25. Presence of intracardiac thrombus, myxoma, tumor, interatrial baffle or patch or other abnormality that precludes vascular access, or manipulation of the catheter.
26. Life expectancy less than 12 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Biosense Webster, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Grandview Medical Center

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Huntsville Hospital

Huntsville, Alabama, United States

Site Status

CHI St. Vincent

Little Rock, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Scripps Health

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego Cardiac Center

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Marian Regional Medical Center

Santa Maria, California, United States

Site Status

St. John's Providence

Santa Monica, California, United States

Site Status

University of Colorado Denver

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

JFK Medical Center

Atlantis, Florida, United States

Site Status

Memorial Healthcare

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Florida Hospital

Orlando, Florida, United States

Site Status

Baptist Hospital/Cardiology Consultants

Pensacola, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tampa General Hospital

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Emory St. Joseph's

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Evanston Community

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Loyola University Medical Center

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Prairie Heart Institute

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Baptist Health Lexington

Kensington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Oschner LSU Health Shreveport

Shreveport, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

University of Michigan

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Abbott Northwestern

Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Lovelace Medical Center

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albany Medical Center

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

NYU Langone

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

New York Presbyterian

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Albert Einstein College of Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Duke University Medical Center

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Ohio State University Medical Center

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Heart Institute

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Providence St Vincent Medical Center

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Medical University of South Carolina

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville Health System

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Erlanger Health System

Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Texas Health Heart and Vascular Hospital

Arlington, Texas, United States

Site Status

St. David's Medical Center

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Intermountain Medical

Murray, Utah, United States

Site Status

Sentara Health

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

MultiCare Tacoma

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Di Biase L, Monir G, Melby D, Tabereaux P, Natale A, Manyam H, Athill C, Delaughter C, Patel A, Gentlesk P, Liu C, Arkles J, McElderry HT Jr, Osorio J; SURPOINT Postapproval Trial Investigators. Composite Index Tagging for PVI in Paroxysmal AF: A Prospective, Multicenter Postapproval Study. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2022 Sep;8(9):1077-1089. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2022.06.007. Epub 2022 Aug 31.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36137711 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BWI_2017_06

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.