Safety and Efficacy of KPI-121 in Subjects With DED

NCT ID: NCT03616899

Last Updated: 2021-04-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

901 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-07-10

Study Completion Date

2020-02-05

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension compared to vehicle (placebo) in subjects who have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease. The product will be studied over 14 days, with 1-2 drops instilled in each eye four times daily (QID).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a Phase 3, multi-center, double-masked, randomized, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension versus vehicle in subjects with dry eye disease.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Kerato Conjunctivitis Sicca

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

KPI-121 Ophthalmic Suspension

Intervention Type DRUG

KPI-121 Ophthalmic Suspension

Vehicle of KPI-121 0.25% Ophthalmic Suspension

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Vehicle

Intervention Type DRUG

Vehicle for KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

KPI-121 Ophthalmic Suspension

KPI-121 Ophthalmic Suspension

Intervention Type DRUG

Vehicle

Vehicle for KPI-121 0.25% ophthalmic suspension

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Have a documented clinical diagnosis of dry eye disease in both eyes

Exclusion Criteria

* Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to the investigational product(s) or components
* History of glaucoma, IOP\>21 mmHg at the screening or randomization visits, or being treated for glaucoma in either eye.
* Diagnosis of: ongoing ocular infection; severe/serious ocular condition that in judgment of Investigator could confound study assessments or limit compliance; or have been exposed to an investigational drug within 30 days prior to screening.
* In the opinion of the Investigator or study coordinator, be unwilling or unable to comply with study protocol or unable to successfully instill eye drops.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Investigator #133

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Investigator #278

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Investigator #146

Chandler, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Investigator #148

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Investigator #280

Prescott, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Investigator #276

Sun City, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Investigator #185

Azusa, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #143

Garden Grove, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #147

Glendale, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #272

Hemet, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #155

Inglewood, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #273

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #130

Mission Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #247

Murrieta, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #215

Newport Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Site #111

Rancho Cordova, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #271

Santa Ana, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #107

Torrance, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #213

Westminster, California, United States

Site Status

Investigator #218

Littleton, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Investigator #184

Brooksville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigator #262

Delray Beach, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigator #279

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigator #265

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigator #157

Largo, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigator #189

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Investigator #136

Morrow, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Investigator #268

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Investigator #266

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Investigator #187

Hoffman Estates, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Investigator #151

Lake Villa, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Investigator #128

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Investigator #250

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Investigator #125

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Investigator #274

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Investigator #195

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Investigator #168

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Investigator #219

Winchester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Investigator #267

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Investigator #123

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Investigator #106

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Investigator #126

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Investigator #131

Washington, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Investigator #281

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Investigator #275

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Investigator #263

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Investigator #138

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Investigator #105

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Investigator #108

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Investigator #132

Wantagh, New York, United States

Site Status

Investigator #264

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigator #217

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigator #149

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigator #102

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigator #163

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigator #282

Southern Pines, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Investigator #269

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigator #142

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigator #137

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigator #171

Mason, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Investigator #224

Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigator #156

Kingston, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigator #200

Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigator #277

West Mifflin, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Investigator #240

Rapid City, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Investigator #127

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Investigator #270

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #188

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #174

Cedar Park, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #140

El Paso, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #124

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #259

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #175

Lakeway, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #182

League City, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #191

League City, Texas, United States

Site Status

Site #177

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #258

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #186

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #176

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Investigator #222

Layton, Utah, United States

Site Status

Investigator #119

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KPI-121-C-011

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.