Phase III Confirmatory Study of DE-089 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Dry Eye

NCT ID: NCT01240382

Last Updated: 2014-08-13

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

332 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

To investigate that the efficacy of 3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution (one drop at a time, 6 times daily, 4 weeks topical administration), in comparison to 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution (0.1% HA) (one drop at a time, 6 times daily, 4 weeks topical administration), is at least non-inferior in the change in fluorescein staining score, and is superior in the change in Rose bengal score, in a multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group comparison study. Safety profile will likewise be compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dry Eye

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

3% DE-089

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution

Intervention Type DRUG

0.1% HA

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution

Intervention Type DRUG

0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Those who show:

* Keratoconjunctival disorder confirmed with vital dye staining
* Abnormal Schirmer score results

Exclusion Criteria

* Eye disease that needs therapy other than that for dry eye
* Those who need to wear contact lenses during the clinical study
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Santen study sites

Osaka, Osaka, Japan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Japan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Takamura E, Tsubota K, Watanabe H, Ohashi Y; Diquafosol Ophthalmic Solution Phase 3 Study Group. A randomised, double-masked comparison study of diquafosol versus sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solutions in dry eye patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2012 Oct;96(10):1310-5. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-301448. Epub 2012 Aug 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 22914501 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

00890602

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.