Trial Outcomes & Findings for Phase III Confirmatory Study of DE-089 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Dry Eye (NCT NCT01240382)
NCT ID: NCT01240382
Last Updated: 2014-08-13
Results Overview
Fluorescein staining was scored according to the protocol by Shimmura et al. The cornea was divided into 3 equal zones: upper, middle, and lower. Each zone had a staining score ranging between 0 and 3 points, with minimum and maximum total staining scores ranging between 0 and 9 points. 0 is better. The degree of staining with Fluorescein dyes was scored as follows: 0 = no staining, 1= staining of less than half of the area, 2= staining of more than half of the area, 3= staining in the whole area.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
332 participants
Baseline and 4-week (discontinued (LOCF))
2014-08-13
Participant Flow
Informed consent was obtained from 332 patients, of whom 287 were randomized and prescribed the study drug.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
3% DE-089
3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution
|
0.1% HA
0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
144
|
143
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
142
|
139
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
3% DE-089
3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution
|
0.1% HA
0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
2
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Fear of adverse events
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Phase III Confirmatory Study of DE-089 Ophthalmic Solution in Patients With Dry Eye
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
3% DE-089
n=144 Participants
3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution
|
0.1% HA
n=143 Participants
0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution
|
Total
n=287 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.1 • n=5 Participants
|
57.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.8 • n=7 Participants
|
56.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.9 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
120 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
125 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
245 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 4-week (discontinued (LOCF))Population: Efficacy analysis was performed full analysis set (FAS). In 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution group, 1 subject was excluded from analysis because there was no available efficacy data in fluorescein staining.
Fluorescein staining was scored according to the protocol by Shimmura et al. The cornea was divided into 3 equal zones: upper, middle, and lower. Each zone had a staining score ranging between 0 and 3 points, with minimum and maximum total staining scores ranging between 0 and 9 points. 0 is better. The degree of staining with Fluorescein dyes was scored as follows: 0 = no staining, 1= staining of less than half of the area, 2= staining of more than half of the area, 3= staining in the whole area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3% DE-089
n=144 Participants
3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution
|
0.1% HA
n=142 Participants
0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Fluorescein Staining Score From Baseline
|
-2.12 points
Standard Deviation 1.66
|
-2.08 points
Standard Deviation 1.52
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and 4-week (discontinued (LOCF))Population: Efficacy analysis was performed full analysis set (FAS). In 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution group, 2 subjects were excluded from analysis because there was no available efficacy data in rose bengal staining.
Rose bengal staining were scored according to the protocol by Shimmura et al. The ocular surface was divided into 5 zones: nasal and temporal conjunctival, and upper, middle, and lower corneal areas. A staining score between 0 and 3 points was used in each zone, with the minimum and maximum total staining scores ranging between 0 and 15 points.0 is better. The degree of staining with Rose bengal dyes was scored as follows: 0 = no staining, 1= staining of less than half of the area, 2= staining of more than half of the area, 3= staining in the whole area.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
3% DE-089
n=144 Participants
3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution
|
0.1% HA
n=141 Participants
0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change in Rose Bengal Staining Score From Baseline
|
-3.06 points
Standard Deviation 2.27
|
-2.38 points
Standard Deviation 2.08
|
Adverse Events
3% DE-089
0.1% HA
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
3% DE-089
n=144 participants at risk
3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution
|
0.1% HA
n=143 participants at risk
0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrointestinal bleeding
|
0.00%
0/144
|
0.70%
1/143
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
3% DE-089
n=144 participants at risk
3% DE-089 ophthalmic solution
|
0.1% HA
n=143 participants at risk
0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution
|
|---|---|---|
|
Eye disorders
Eye irritation
|
6.2%
9/144
|
0.70%
1/143
|
Additional Information
General Manager of Clinical Development Group
Santen Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place