Comparison of Transcutaneous Vs End-tidal CO2 Pressure Measurements in Hyperventilation Syndrome Diagnosis

NCT ID: NCT03614806

Last Updated: 2020-06-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

14 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-12-21

Study Completion Date

2018-02-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hyper Ventilation Syndrome is a frequent disease affecting adults whose diagnosis is often belated or even unrecognized due to the lack of "gold standard" criteria. Its diagnosis currently relies on the Nijmegen score associated with a PetCO2 assesment using a hyperventilation provocation test. Correlation between Nijmegen Questionnaire scores and PetCO2 appears highly variable. PtcCO2 monitoring is a noninvasive alternative method providing a continuous estimation of arterial CO2 pressure (PaCO2) which could represent an advantageous alternative to PetCO2 measurements. Several reports have demonstrated that PtcCO2 monitoring reflects more faithfully PaCO2 than PetCO2, no study have evaluated its value in this indication.

The primary aim of the study is to compare the diagnostic value of PtcPCO2 monitoring with PetCO2, the method currently used.

Included patient will be invited to fill in the Nijmegen questionnaire and an ambient air gas measurement will be performed. PtcCO2 (mmHg) will be simultaneously measured during hyperventilation test. Nijmegen score signs reproduced by the test will be analysed. HVS diagnosis will be assessed by usual criteria (PetCO2 \<30 mmHg at the end of hyperventilation test or under the PetCO2 value at rest, Nijmegen score\> 23).

PtcCO2 data will be blinded interpreted later. We will compare if PetCO2 and PtcCO2 leads to the same diagnosis or not.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Primary Goal:

Show that the use of either of the two pCO2 measurements leads to the same diagnostic conclusion in HVS diagnosis with a likelihood greater than 80 %.

Secondary Outcome Measures :

Evaluate the correlation between PtcCO2 and PtcCO2 measurements Evaluate tolerance to the hyperventilation test

Inclusion Criteria :

1. The patient must have reached the age of the civil majority (≥ 18 yo)
2. All patients refered to the Physiology department of Rouen University Hospital, France, for an hyperventilation test
3. The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance program
4. The patient must have given his / her free and informed consent and signed the consent

Exclusion Criteria :

1. Sepsis
2. Hypercapnia (PaCO2 \> 50mmHg)
3. Patient treated by long-term oxygen therapy
4. Subjects under judicial protection, or adults under any kind of guardianship or under judicial control
5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding women
6. Electrolytic unbalance
7. Hyperthyroidism
8. Neurological disease
9. Probability of drug-induced hyperventilation (progestagens , aspirin, beta agonists)

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hyperventilation Syndrome Hypocapnia Alkalosis, Respiratory Hyperventilation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

open label study prospective
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients tested for hyperventilation

Simultaneous Transcutaneous and End-tidal CO2 measurements. Eligible patients will be first invited to fill in the Nijmegen questionnaire. Then, in an hyperventilation test, transcutaneous Carbon Dioxide Pressure will be recorded simultaneously with the standard End-tidal Carbon Dioxide Pressure measurement.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Simultaneous Transcutaneous and End-tidal CO2 measurements

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Included patients will be invited to fill in the Nijmegen questionnaire. During the hyperventilation test, PtcCO2 (mmHg) will be recorded simultaneously with the standard End-tidal Cpartial pressure CO2 measurement

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Simultaneous Transcutaneous and End-tidal CO2 measurements

Included patients will be invited to fill in the Nijmegen questionnaire. During the hyperventilation test, PtcCO2 (mmHg) will be recorded simultaneously with the standard End-tidal Cpartial pressure CO2 measurement

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. The patient must have reached the age of the civil majority (≥ 18 yo)
2. All patients refered to the Physiology department of Rouen University Hospital, France, for an hyperventilation test
3. The patient must be a member or beneficiary of a health insurance program
4. The patient must have given his / her free and informed consent and signed the consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Sepsis
2. Hypercapnia (PaCO2 \> 50mmHg)
3. Patient treated by long-term oxygen therapy
4. Subjects under judicial protection, or adults under any kind of guardianship or under judicial control
5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding women
6. Electrolytic unbalance
7. Hyperthyroidism
8. Neurological disease
9. Probability of drug-induced hyperventilation (progestagens , aspirin, beta agonists)
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Rouen

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

ARTAUD-MACARI Elise, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Rouen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Physiology department of Rouen University Hospital,

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2017/128/HP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.