Pulmonary Vascular Effects of Respiratory Rate & Carbon Dioxide
NCT ID: NCT01927237
Last Updated: 2017-02-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
NA
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-09-30
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT00000572
Protective Ventilation With Carbon Dioxide (CO2) -Removal Technique in Patients With Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)
NCT00465309
Effect of Alveolar Minute Ventilation on Respiratory Gas Heat Content
NCT01943227
Enhanced Lung Protective Ventilation With ECCO2R During ARDS
NCT03525691
Strategy of UltraProtective Lung Ventilation With Extracorporeal CO2 Removal for New-Onset Moderate to seVere ARDS
NCT02282657
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Ventilation with low tidal volumes has been shown definitively to improve mortality from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)1 and may provide benefit even in patients without ARDS.2 During low tidal volume ventilation, practice varies on whether to allow some degree of alveolar hypoventilation with incidental hypercapnic acidosis (termed "permissive hypercapnia"),3 or to increase respiratory rate to maintain alveolar ventilation and target eucapnia, often requiring respiratory rates \> 30/min.4 The physiological consequences of these divergent strategies remain to be fully elucidated. We propose the following study to distinguish the effects of a eucapnic high respiratory rate (EHR) strategy from a hypercapnic low respiratory rate (HLR) strategy on pulmonary hemodynamics during low tidal volume ventilation.
Specific Aim: To test the hypothesis that, while administering inspired CO2, eucapnia achieved by high respiratory rate (EHR) significantly decreases pulmonary artery pressures compared to hypercapnia with a lower respiratory rate (HLR).
Specific Aim: To test the hypothesis that EHR decreases myocardial strain compared to HLR.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
HLR-first
Patients in this arm will have the "hypercapnia with low respiratory rate" (HLR) strategy first. Once hypercapnia is achieved via inspired carbon dioxide, no additional changes will be made to the ventilator. Once steady-state is achieved, physiological measurements will be taken. The patient will be returned to baseline settings for a 15-minute "rest period" before starting the EHR strategy per the cross-over design.
HLR
EHR
EHR-first
Patients in this arm will have the "eucapnia with high respiratory rate" (EHR) strategy first. Once hypercapnia is achieved via inspired carbon dioxide, respiratory rate will be increased until PetCO2 returns to baseline or up to 35 breaths per minute, as limited by the National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) ARDS Network protocol. fraction of inspired oxygen inspired oxygen fraction and set tidal volume will be maintained. Once steady-state is achieved, physiological measurements will be taken. The patient will be returned to baseline settings for a 15-minute "rest period" before starting the HLR strategy per the cross-over design.
HLR
EHR
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HLR
EHR
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to consent pre-operatively prior to scheduled cardiac surgery.
* Intubation on mechanical ventilation post-operatively.
* Presence of a pulmonary artery catheter and/or central venous catheter as part of usual care post-operatively.
* Presence of a radial, brachial, or femoral arterial catheter as part of usual care post-operatively.
Exclusion Criteria
* Intra-cardiac or intrapulmonary shunt.
* Persistent post-operative moderate or severe hypoxemia, defined as PaO2/FiO2 \< 200 mmHg.
* Moderate or severe lung disease, including moderate or severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma.
* Recently treated for bleeding varices, stricture, or hematemesis, esophageal trauma, recent esophageal surgery, or other contraindication to transesophageal echocardiography.
* Severe coagulopathy (platelet count \< 10,000 or international normalized ratio \[INR\] \> 4).
* History of lung, heart, or liver transplant.
* Elevated intracranial pressure or conditions where hypercapnia-induced elevations in intracranial pressure should be avoided, including:
* Intracranial hemorrhage
* Cerebral contusion
* Cerebral edema
* Mass effect (midline shift on head CT)
* Flat EEG for \> 2 hours
* Evidence of active air leak from the lung, such as broncho-pleural fistula or ongoing air leak from an existing chest tube.
* Treating physician refusal.
* Inability to obtain informed consent directly from the subject prior to surgery.
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniel Talmor
Edward Lowenstein Professor of Anaesthesia
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniel Talmor, MD MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Malhotra A. Low-tidal-volume ventilation in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2007 Sep 13;357(11):1113-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMct074213.
Serpa Neto A, Cardoso SO, Manetta JA, Pereira VG, Esposito DC, Pasqualucci Mde O, Damasceno MC, Schultz MJ. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012 Oct 24;308(16):1651-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.13730.
Amato MB, Barbas CS, Medeiros DM, Magaldi RB, Schettino GP, Lorenzi-Filho G, Kairalla RA, Deheinzelin D, Munoz C, Oliveira R, Takagaki TY, Carvalho CR. Effect of a protective-ventilation strategy on mortality in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 1998 Feb 5;338(6):347-54. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802053380602.
Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M, Stern EJ, Hudson LD. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1685-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050333.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2013P000222
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.