Continous Popliteal Block for Microvascular Free Flap Reconstruction in Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery
NCT ID: NCT03607227
Last Updated: 2021-04-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-09-01
2021-04-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy of Genicular Block on Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery
NCT06942702
Adductor Canal Nerve Block Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT01939379
Efficacy, Safety, and Pharmacokinetics of Femoral Nerve Block With EXPAREL in Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT02713178
Adductor Canal Block Versus Femoral Block on Pain and Quadriceps Strength
NCT05190120
Minimum Effective Concentration of Ropivacaine for Brachial Plexus Block Via the Supraclavicular and Infraclavicular Approach, Femoral Nerve Block, Sciatic Nerve Block Via the Popliteal and Parasacral Approach
NCT01452126
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will receive information about the study and, if they opt to participate, be included during the routine preoperative visit. All patients included in the study will preoperatively receive a popliteal nerve block catheter in technical accordance with local procedure guidelines, and be randomized to either active substance (local anesthetic) or placebo (saline solution). They will receive a bolus injection of the allotted substance (blinded to both patient, care provider and investigator) at the start of surgery, followed by continuous infusion during the first, maximally, seven days. During this period pain, nausea and vomiting, as well as sensory and motor function in the operated leg will be recorded regularly. Opioid consumption, need for other analgesics and ability to mobilize will also be noted. Follow up of above mentioned parameters will be made at the first routine office visit at three months postoperatively.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Local anesthetic
Levobupivacaine 3.75 mg/ml 15 ml is given as a bolus injection at start of surgery, followed by ropivacaine 2 mg/ml continous infusion 5-8 ml/h from the end of surgery until end of intervention at the fourth to seventh postoperative day.
Levobupivacaine
Active substance. Levobupivacaine 3.75 mg/ml 15 ml is given as a bolus injection at start of surgery, followed by ropivacaine 2 mg/ml continous infusion 5-8 ml/h from the end of surgery until end of intervention at the fourth to seventh postoperative day.
Saline
Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) is given in equivalent intervals and doses as in the active substance arm.
Saline Solution
Placebo. Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) is given in equivalent intervals and doses as the active substances.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Levobupivacaine
Active substance. Levobupivacaine 3.75 mg/ml 15 ml is given as a bolus injection at start of surgery, followed by ropivacaine 2 mg/ml continous infusion 5-8 ml/h from the end of surgery until end of intervention at the fourth to seventh postoperative day.
Saline Solution
Placebo. Saline solution (NaCl 0.9%) is given in equivalent intervals and doses as the active substances.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Preoperatively able to walk (with or without aid).
Exclusion Criteria
* Conditions of coagulopathy, or treatment with anticoagulant drugs, that contraindicates peripheral nerve block according to local guidelines.
* Local anesthetic allergy.
* Inability to understand study information or answer questions.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Region Skane
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Louise Walther Sturesson, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Skåne University hospital, Region Skåne
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Skane University Hospital Lund, Divison of Anaestesia and Intensive Care
Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Marur S, Forastiere AA. Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Update on Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Mar;91(3):386-96. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.12.017.
Ragbir M, Brown JS, Mehanna H. Reconstructive considerations in head and neck surgical oncology: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines. J Laryngol Otol. 2016 May;130(S2):S191-S197. doi: 10.1017/S0022215116000621.
Dort JC, Farwell DG, Findlay M, Huber GF, Kerr P, Shea-Budgell MA, Simon C, Uppington J, Zygun D, Ljungqvist O, Harris J. Optimal Perioperative Care in Major Head and Neck Cancer Surgery With Free Flap Reconstruction: A Consensus Review and Recommendations From the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Mar 1;143(3):292-303. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2981.
Borgeat A, Blumenthal S, Lambert M, Theodorou P, Vienne P. The feasibility and complications of the continuous popliteal nerve block: a 1001-case survey. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jul;103(1):229-33, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000221462.87951.8d.
White PF, Issioui T, Skrivanek GD, Early JS, Wakefield C. The use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery? Anesth Analg. 2003 Nov;97(5):1303-1309. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000082242.84015.D4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Region Skane 20180602
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.