Evaluating the Analgesic Efficacy of Superficial Cervical Plexus Block for Maxillofacial Surgeries

NCT ID: NCT07236086

Last Updated: 2025-11-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-31

Study Completion Date

2027-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The superficial cervical plexus (SCP) originates from the anterior rami of C1-C4 and gives four cutaneous branches supplying the anterolateral neck, external ear, and shoulder tip (1). A superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) is performed by subcutaneous injection at the midpoint of the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid, targeting these sensory branches using either landmarks or ultrasound guidance. The goal of the ultrasound (US)-guided technique of superficial cervical plexus nerve block is to deposit local anesthetic within the vicinity of the sensory branches of the nerve roots C2, C3, and C4 (2). SCPB has been successfully used for analgesia in mandibular, tympanomastoid, thyroid, submandibular, and clavicular surgeries, and can even serve as the sole anaesthetic technique in external ear procedures (3, 4). As complications may arise while administrating a SCPB, an adequate understanding of the block physiology and local anesthetic toxicity can mitigate these issues. Superficial cervical plexus block shares common complications with other local anesthetic-based nerve blocks including intravascular injection into a vein or an artery, hematoma formation, infection risk and local anesthetic toxicity. It is worthy to refer that complications are of a higher incidence in deep blocks than superficial ones

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The superficial cervical plexus (SCP) originates from the anterior rami of C1-C4 and gives four cutaneous branches supplying the anterolateral neck, external ear, and shoulder tip (1). A superficial cervical plexus block (SCPB) is performed by subcutaneous injection at the midpoint of the posterior border of the sternocleidomastoid, targeting these sensory branches using either landmarks or ultrasound guidance. The goal of the ultrasound (US)-guided technique of superficial cervical plexus nerve block is to deposit local anesthetic within the vicinity of the sensory branches of the nerve roots C2, C3, and C4 (2). SCPB has been successfully used for analgesia in mandibular, tympanomastoid, thyroid, submandibular, and clavicular surgeries, and can even serve as the sole anaesthetic technique in external ear procedures (3, 4). As complications may arise while administrating a SCPB, an adequate understanding of the block physiology and local anesthetic toxicity can mitigate these issues. Superficial cervical plexus block shares common complications with other local anesthetic-based nerve blocks including intravascular injection into a vein or an artery, hematoma formation, infection risk and local anesthetic toxicity. It is worthy to refer that complications are of a higher incidence in deep blocks than superficial ones .

Based on this background, the present study aims to evaluate the analgesic effect of US-guided SCPB in maxillofacial surgeries compared with conventional general anaesthesia, focusing on intra- and postoperative systemic analgesic requirements, pain scores on the visual analog scale (VAS), total duration of analgesia, vital parameters, and the incidence of postoperative complications.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Maxillofacial Surgeries

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The patient, surgeon, the outcome assessor and the statistician will be blinded about patient's group allocation. The anesthetist responsible for the patient intraoperatively will not be blinded to patient group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

control group

patients will recive IV saline only

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Saline (0.9% NaCl)

Intervention Type DRUG

patient will recive saline

study group

patient will recived superficial Cervical plexus Block with 10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

superficial cervical plexus nerve block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The fascial plane delineating the space between the levator scapulae and SCM can then be detected. Within this striated, hyperechoic substance, a hypoechoic cluster representing the superficial cervical plexus can be visualized, typically located just deep to the posterior surface of the lateral SCM.

With an in-plane technique, 22-G needle is introduced parallel to the ultrasound beam, proceeding from the posterolateral to the medial direction. The needle will be advanced through the skin and platysma under real-time ultrasound guidance until it approaches to the plexus. Aspiration will be performed to ensure the needle tip is not within a vascular structure.

Bupivacaine

Intervention Type DRUG

10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered in a supine position with the head turned opposite to the side of the block.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

superficial cervical plexus nerve block

The fascial plane delineating the space between the levator scapulae and SCM can then be detected. Within this striated, hyperechoic substance, a hypoechoic cluster representing the superficial cervical plexus can be visualized, typically located just deep to the posterior surface of the lateral SCM.

With an in-plane technique, 22-G needle is introduced parallel to the ultrasound beam, proceeding from the posterolateral to the medial direction. The needle will be advanced through the skin and platysma under real-time ultrasound guidance until it approaches to the plexus. Aspiration will be performed to ensure the needle tip is not within a vascular structure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Saline (0.9% NaCl)

patient will recive saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Bupivacaine

10 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be administered in a supine position with the head turned opposite to the side of the block.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

SCPB

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* • Age 18-65 years

* BMI \< 30 kg/m2
* American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA) I - III
* Patients scheduled for maxillofacial procedures involving submandibular area e.g. submandibular and submental abscesses, neck region e.g. cervical lymph node biopsies and ear lobe procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

* • Patient refusal

* Coagulopathy
* Local infection ate the site of injection
* Pre-existing neuropathy or neurological disease
* Hypersensitivity to local anaesthetics used
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Assiut University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Rahma Mohamed Atef Mohamed

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rahma M. Atef, MBBCH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assiut University

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Rahma M. Atef, MBBCH

Role: CONTACT

01061574582 ext. 002

Shimaa A. Hassan, M.D.

Role: CONTACT

01002953253 ext. 002

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SCPB267

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Motor Sparing Supraclavicular Block
NCT06074471 RECRUITING NA
Parasagittal Vs Cornerpocket Approaches
NCT06352333 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA