Comparison of Static Air Support Devices (Repose®) and Alternating-Pressure Devices in the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers

NCT ID: NCT03597750

Last Updated: 2018-10-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

308 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-04-19

Study Completion Date

2018-07-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Maintaining and improving skin health are major goals in acute and long-term care. Patients at the extremes of age, the critically ill, medically compromised and those with immobility are at risk for developing several skin disorders, with pressure ulcers (PUs) as one of the most common and mostly preventable ones. Prevalence figures of PUs vary between 6.4% and 31.4%. PUs are described as localised injuries to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure or pressure combined with shear. Prevention of PUs is internationally seen to be a key quality indicator of care. To prevent PUs, reducing both the amount and the duration of pressure and shear at the pressure points of the body is strongly recommended. One of the interventions to achieving this, is the use of pressure-reducing devices (mattresses, cushions, etc.). Studies that compare the (cost-) effectiveness of different pressure-reducing devices are needed.

The primary aim of this study is to compare the (cost-) effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention in high risk patients using static air support devices (Repose®) versus alternating-pressure devices. The second aim is to get insight in patients' experiences and perceptions of comfort using static air support devices and alternating-pressure devices. The third aim is to get insight in caretakers' perceptions of barriers and facilitators of the use of static air support devices and alternating-pressure devices and to reveal how these perceptions influence the readiness to use the products in clinical practice.

This randomized controlled trial will be performed in ca. 25 nursing homes in a random sample of 306 residents who are at high risk of developing pressure ulcers. Residents will be included in the study for a period of 14 days. Skin assessment and risk factor registration will be done on a daily basis by the nurses. Reliability checks and time measurements will be completed by the researcher.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pressure Ulcer Pressure Injury Pressure Sore Bed Sore

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Static air support devices (Repose®)

Alternating-pressure devices will be replaced by static air support devices (Repose®) during 14 days:

* Repose® Mattress
* Repose® Cushion
* Repose® Wedge or Foot Protectors

The frequency of repositioning remains unchanged.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Repose®

Intervention Type DEVICE

* Repose® Mattress
* Repose® Cushion
* Repose® Wedge or Foot Protectors

Alternating-pressure devices

Instead of replacing the alternating-pressure devices by static air support devices (Repose®), the residents remain on their alternating-pressure devices.

The frequency of repositioning remains unchanged.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Repose®

* Repose® Mattress
* Repose® Cushion
* Repose® Wedge or Foot Protectors

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* High risk of pressure ulcers (Braden score \< 12) and/or pressure ulcer category 1
* Currently using alternating-pressure devices
* Bedbound (\> 8 hours in bed) or chair bound (\> 8 hours in chair)
* Aged \> 65 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Pressure ulcer category 2,3,4, deep tissue injury (DTI) or unstageable pressure ulcer
* Expected length of stay \< 2 weeks
* End of life care
* Medical contraindication for use of static air support devices
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Frontier Medical Group, UK

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

UCVV

University Centre for Nursing and Midwifery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dimitri Beeckman, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Ghent

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Woonzorgcentrum Zonnetij

Aartselaar, Antwerpen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Zonnewende

Aartselaar, Antwerpen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum De Mick

Brasschaat, Antwerpen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Maria

Brecht, Antwerpen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Veilige Have

Aalter, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Jozef

Assenede, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum De Vijvers

Gentbrugge, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Meulenbroek

Hamme, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Heilig Hart

Oudenaarde, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Egmont

Zottegem, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Vincentius

Avelgem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Hallenhuis

Bruges, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Minnewater

Bruges, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Ter Potterie

Bruges, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Van Zuylen

Bruges, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Huize Zonnelied

Ieper, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Maria Rustoord

Ingelmunster, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum De Plataan

Izegem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum De Pottelberg

Kortrijk, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Jozef

Kortrijk, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum OLV Gasthuis

Poperinge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Hof Ten Ijzer

Reninge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Wintershove

Vlamertinge, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum De Meers

Waregem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Camillus

Wevelgem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Woonzorgcentrum Sint-Amand

Zwevegem, West-Vlaanderen, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

McInnes E, Jammali-Blasi A, Bell-Syer SE, Dumville JC, Middleton V, Cullum N. Support surfaces for pressure ulcer prevention. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD001735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001735.pub5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26333288 (View on PubMed)

Serraes B, Beeckman D. Static Air Support Surfaces to Prevent Pressure Injuries: A Multicenter Cohort Study in Belgian Nursing Homes. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2016 Jul-Aug;43(4):375-8. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000244.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27391289 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.ucvvgent.be

Website of the research group

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

B670201731706

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

EC/2017/0266

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.