Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
240 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-08-04
2019-02-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
PDPH is defined as a headache that develops within five days of dural puncture and can't be attributed to any other types of headache and mostly is postural in character.
Neostigmine methylsulfate is a synthetic carbamic acid ester which reversibly inhibits the enzyme Acetylcholine esterase (AChE) that makes more Acetylcholine molecules available at cholinergic receptors. Neostigmine is used in anesthesia mainly as a reversal for non-depolarizing neuromuscular agents.
Intrathecal (IT) neostigmine was tried as an adjuvant to local anesthetics in IT block for elective cesarean sections to decrease local anesthetic consumption and to prolong postoperative analgesia. Side effects of IT neostigmine are dose-dependent with doses more than 25 µg especially nausea and vomiting and could be decreased by increasing the baricities of the local anesthetic solutions and by early head up position after IT injection. However, its effect on PDPH was not investigated before in literature.
Parturients will be randomly assigned into one of two groups: the intervention group will receive 20 µg with IT Bupivacaine and the control group will receive an equivalent volume of dextrose 5% with the IT Bupivacaine.
The objective of the current study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IT neostigmine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in reducing the incidence and severity of post-dural puncture headache in parturients scheduled for an elective cesarean section.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prophylactic Intravenous Injection of Neostigmine Plus Atropine Versus Ketorolac on Post-dural Puncture Headache in Patients Undergoing Infraumbilical Surgeries
NCT06729047
Nebulized Dexmedetomidine or Lidocaine for Treatment of Post Dural Puncture Headache in Parturients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section Under Spinal Anesthesia
NCT06607861
Effect of Intravenous Versus Intrathecal Dexamethazone on Postdural Puncture Headache
NCT04709029
Comparison of Nebulized Neostigmine/Atropine Versus Lignocaine in Treating Acute Post-dural Puncture Headache Following Subarachnoid Block in Parturient Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section. A Randomized, Clinical Trial.
NCT06824025
Aminophylline Prophylaxis For Postdural Puncture Headache
NCT02150304
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Randomization will be done by using computer-generated random numbers that will be placed in separate opaque envelopes that will be opened by study investigators just before IT block. Neither the participants, the study investigators, the attending clinicians, nor the data collectors will be aware of groups' allocation until the study end. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) recommendations for reporting randomized, controlled clinical trials will be followed.
Preoperative preparations and Premedication:
The study solutions will be prepared in a one milliliter syringe as following: For the intervention group (N), it will contain 20 µg of Neostigmine® (0.5 mg/ml ampules manufactured by Amriya for pharmaceutical industries in Alexandria, Egypt) neostigmine ampule will be diluted in 4 ml dextrose 5% to make a solution of 100 µg/ml, 0.2 ml of this solution will be used, while in the control group an equal volume (0.2 ml) of dextrose 5% will be prepared. The syringes used will be labeled as A and B per their content. The identical coded syringe will be prepared by trained anesthesia technicians who will not be included in the study.
All parturients will receive 150 mg Ranitidine oral tablet on the night before and on the morning of the operation as a premedication.
Intraoperative technique and management:
Upon arrival to the operating room standard monitors (Pulse oximeter, Noninvasive blood pressure monitoring, and Electrocardiogram) will be applied and continued all over the operation, an eighteen gauge (18G) peripheral intravenous (IV) cannula will be inserted, and 10 ml/kg of Ringer lactate solution warmed to 37°C will be infused over 15 minutes as a preload.
IT block will be performed via a midline approach into the L4-5 interspaces in sitting position with complete aseptic condition using a 25 gauge Quincke spinal needle after giving 3 ml of lidocaine 2% (60 mg) as a subcutaneous infiltration. After confirming free cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow through the needle a 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % in addition to the content of the prepared study syringe will be slowly injected. Then, the parturient will be immediately placed in the supine position with 15° left tilt, and an oxygen mask will be applied at 2 l/min.
After ensuring sufficient anesthesia level, the surgical procedure will start with continuous hemodynamics monitoring and recording. If the systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreased to 20% below the baseline or less than 90 mmHg, ephedrine 5 mg will be administered intravenously. Also, if heart rate (HR) will be less than 50 beats/min, atropine sulfate 0.5 mg will be administered intravenously. Any intraoperative or postoperative nausea or vomiting will be managed with 10 mg of metoclopramide Upon delivery of the fetus, ten units of oxytocin will be given by IV infusion, and if the uterus is not well contracted, additional increments of 5 units will be added accordingly. One gm of Ceftriaxone will be also given after delivery of the fetus by IV infusion.
Postoperative monitoring, Pain control and follow up:
At the end of surgery, Participant will be transferred to postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU) with standard monitoring applied. All Participants will receive 75 mg diclofenac sodium intramuscular every 12 hours as a pain management per institution policy, 1,23 4 mg of morphine will be given IV if rescue analgesia is needed postoperatively every 10 minutes with a maximum of 20 mg in 6 hours or 32 mg in 24 hours. The participant will be transferred to obstetrics ward after fulfilling the criteria of modified Aldrete scoring system. 24 Assessment for post-dural puncture headache and other associated symptoms will be done from day 0 to day five postoperatively and if the participant will be discharged home, follow up will be done by a phone call. If there will be a complaint of a headache, the participant will be asked to come back to the hospital for proper assessment and management either on an outpatient or inpatient bases per the headache severity.
The participants who will be diagnosed to have PDPH per the criteria of the International Headache Society (HIS) will be treated by using oral medications Panadol extra™ (paracetamol 1gm + caffeine 130 mg) (Manufactured by: Alexandria company for pharmaceuticals \& chemical industries under license: GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Ltd. Ireland) at 6-hour interval in addition to hydration and bed rest. Severe Intractable headache (VAS ≥ 40) persistent for more than 48 hours with no response to conservative measures will be managed with an epidural blood patch after participant approval and consent signing.
Statistical analysis and sample size estimation:
Continuous variables will be tested for normal distribution by the Shapiro-Wilk test (P ≤ 0.05). Parametric data will be expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD) and analyzed by using the independent t-test. Data with kurtosis or skewness will be depicted as median and interquartile range and compared for significant difference by implementation of Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables will be presented as numbers and frequencies and the chi-square test or Fisher exact test will be used to analyze the significant differences between the two arms. A P value ≤ 0.05 will be considered statistically significant. Data will be analyzed using SPSS (SPSS 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, II, USA).
The sample size calculation based on that a 15 % reduction in the incidence of PDPH between the two arms could be of clinically important relevance. The reported incidence of PDPH with the use of 25 gauge Quincke needle is 25 %. Sample size of 100 participants per group were found sufficient assuming (two tail) α = 0.05, β = 0.2 (80 % power), and 1:1 allocation ratio. We will plan to recruit 120 participants per group to account for data loss or protocol violation. The sample size calculation performed with G\*Power software version 3.1.9.2 (Institute of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The Intervention Group (N)
Neostigmine Methylsulfate intervention : A one milliliter syringe will contain 20 µg of Neostigmine methyl sulfate. 0.5 mg ampule (1 ml) will be diluted in 4 ml dextrose 5% to make a solution of 100 µg/ml, 0.2 ml of this solution will be added to 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % used for intrathecal injection.
Neostigmine Methylsulfate
20 µg Neostigmine Methylsulfate intrathecal in 0.2 ml of Dextrose 5% solution
Dextrose 5% in water
intrathecal
The Control Group (P)
Dextrose 5% in water intervention : an equal volume (0.2 ml) of dextrose 5% will be added to 2.5 ml of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5 % used for intrathecal injection.
Dextrose 5% in water
intrathecal
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Neostigmine Methylsulfate
20 µg Neostigmine Methylsulfate intrathecal in 0.2 ml of Dextrose 5% solution
Dextrose 5% in water
intrathecal
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* pre-eclampsia
* any contraindication to regional anesthesia such as local infection or bleeding disorders
* allergy to neostigmine
* long-term opioid use
* a history of chronic pain, migraine, cluster headache
* digestive problems with nausea or vomiting
* cognitive or memory disorders
* history of urinary retention; bronchial asthma
* perioperative blood transfusion
20 Years
40 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fayoum University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Hany M Yassin, MD
Associate Professor of Anesthesiology
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Hany M Yassin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of medicine, Fayoum university
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Fayoum University hospital
El Fayoum Qesm, Faiyum Governorate, Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013 Jul;33(9):629-808. doi: 10.1177/0333102413485658. No abstract available.
Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Munoz L, Godoy-Casasbuenas N, Ciapponi A, Arevalo JJ, Boogaard S, Roque I Figuls M. Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 7;4(4):CD010807. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010807.pub2.
Nath S, Koziarz A, Badhiwala JH, Alhazzani W, Jaeschke R, Sharma S, Banfield L, Shoamanesh A, Singh S, Nassiri F, Oczkowski W, Belley-Cote E, Truant R, Reddy K, Meade MO, Farrokhyar F, Bala MM, Alshamsi F, Krag M, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Kunz R, Nishida O, Matouk C, Selim M, Rhodes A, Hawryluk G, Almenawer SA. Atraumatic versus conventional lumbar puncture needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2018 Mar 24;391(10126):1197-1204. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32451-0. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
Fattahi Z, Hadavi SM, Sahmeddini MA. Effect of ondansetron on post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients undergoing cesarean section: a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study. J Anesth. 2015 Oct;29(5):702-7. doi: 10.1007/s00540-015-2000-5. Epub 2015 Mar 27.
Cossu AP, De Giudici LM, Piras D, Mura P, Scanu M, Cossu M, Saba M, Finco G, Brazzi L. A systematic review of the effects of adding neostigmine to local anesthetics for neuraxial administration in obstetric anesthesia and analgesia. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2015 Aug;24(3):237-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2015.05.002. Epub 2015 May 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
M335
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.