Neural Indications of Stress-Induced Mental Overload

NCT ID: NCT03585205

Last Updated: 2022-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-23

Study Completion Date

2018-10-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the current research is to characterize the complex interaction between stress and cognitive workload. Furthermore, the investigators aim to create a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) inspired Electroencephalogram (EEG) brain-based bio-marker for cognitive load under stress.

Secondary project 1 aim: The aim of this study is to characterize the link between sensorimotor network (SMN) within and between functional connectivity following the stress response and its association with physiological indices and self-report measures.

Secondary project 2 aim: To elucidate temporal alterations of topological patterns (i.e., integration and segregation), the investigators seek to examine resting state fMRI data before and after a cognitive load task and an acute stress induction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Research in the past years on stress and its influence on cognitive workload suggests that their relationship is not simply linear. On one hand, stress disrupts the processes of attention, memory, and complicated decision-making. While on the other hand, stress response allows the individual to recognize threats quickly, react accordingly, return the body to homeostasis, and prepare the organism for future challenges. However, it is still unclear why different individuals deal with cognitive workload under stress differently, and which brain mechanisms are underlying these processes.

In this current research the use of non-invasive imaging techniques, such as EEG and fMRI, in addition to physiological measurements, such as heart rate, skin conductance, and eye movements, will allow an objective characterization of the individual's response to cognitive workload under stress.

Secondary Project 1: Psychological stress has an immense influence on mental and physical homeostasis. Stress reactivity and recovery involve distributed neural activation, but it is unclear which neural mechanism underlies mental and physical associations of stress adversities. One candidate for such a connection is the sensorimotor network (SMN); comprised of S1, M1, the posterior insula, and the ventral posterior thalamus. The most recognized role of the somato-sensorimotor network is the processing of bodily sensory inputs, represented in the sensory homunculus. Despite the clear involvement of body reaction to stress, evidence regarding the involvement of the sensorimotor network in the modulation of the mental stress response is currently lacking.

Previous studies found decreased or increased resting state-FC (rsFC) between the Posterior PCC (PCC); a major node in DMN, and two major nodes in the SMN, the posterior insula and thalamus, respectively (Vaisvaser et al., 2013). Additionally, a recent study (Zhang et al., 2020) that applied graph analysis, a method to depict segregation and integration typology of brain networks, found that under lab-induced stress, the SMN exhibited higher between-networks FC, the DMN exhibited enhanced within-FC, and the CEN exhibited decreased within-FC. Moreover, the SMN was found to have a high connection ratio within its own network nodes. These findings demonstrate an enhanced tendency of the SMN to communicate with other functional networks under acute stress. These findings could be framed as a change in network typology under conditions of high demands; assuming higher between networks FC in contrast to states of low demand (Shine, 2019). Nevertheless, there is limited evidence about the change of resting-state functional brain networks following a stressful event. Such an approach will help portray the neural mechanism of reactivity and possibly recovery from stress; a major source of inter-individual differences. We aim to uncover the involvement of the sensorimotor network in response to acute stress and its association with other functional neural networks, physiological stress response, and self-report characteristics.

Secondary Project 2: Functional connectivity changes due to a stressogenic experience were thoroughly researched. For the most part, studies have only assessed functional connectivity using the conventional static connectivity approach; thus, neglecting temporal alterations of topological patterns (i.e., integration and segregation) that remained unclear.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Healthy Stress, Psychological

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

cognitive load with/ without stress induction

Participants will engage in demanding cognitive load computerized tasks (such as N-back and Stroop tasks). They will engage in these tasks once in a non-stressful (neutral condition), and once in a stressful condition.

Psychological stress will be induced by the following methods:

1. Limiting time for task completion
2. Providing negative feedback on participants' performance in relation to others
3. Presentation of sudden, loud sounds during task

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Healthy subjects - assessed via the health questionnaire attached as an addition to the protocol
* Without any known neurological disease
* Normal or corrected vision
* All subjects must apply the standard criteria for inclusion and exclusion for a medical MRI scan, according to the MRI safety screening questionnaire of the "Wohl" MRI institute of the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.

Exclusion Criteria

* Neurological injury or disease
* Claustrophobia
* Unremoved metals (according to the MRI safety screening questionnaire)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Elbit Systems LTD

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Talma Hendler, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Israel

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hermans EJ, Henckens MJ, Joels M, Fernandez G. Dynamic adaptation of large-scale brain networks in response to acute stressors. Trends Neurosci. 2014 Jun;37(6):304-14. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2014.03.006. Epub 2014 Apr 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24766931 (View on PubMed)

Vaisvaser S, Lin T, Admon R, Podlipsky I, Greenman Y, Stern N, Fruchter E, Wald I, Pine DS, Tarrasch R, Bar-Haim Y, Hendler T. Neural traces of stress: cortisol related sustained enhancement of amygdala-hippocampal functional connectivity. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Jul 5;7:313. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00313. eCollection 2013.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23847492 (View on PubMed)

Zhang Y, Dai Z, Hu J, Qin S, Yu R, Sun Y. Stress-induced changes in modular organizations of human brain functional networks. Neurobiol Stress. 2020 May 25;13:100231. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2020.100231. eCollection 2020 Nov.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32490057 (View on PubMed)

Shine JM. Neuromodulatory Influences on Integration and Segregation in the Brain. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Jul;23(7):572-583. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.04.002. Epub 2019 May 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31076192 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TASMC-18-TH-0407-17-TLV-CTIL

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Touch and Attention MRI Study
NCT01432288 COMPLETED