Closing the Gap Between Self-reported and Accelerometer-based Physical Activity

NCT ID: NCT03539237

Last Updated: 2019-01-04

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

379 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-05-23

Study Completion Date

2018-11-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study examines the effect of a video-based intensity level demonstration on self-reported physical activity in individuals aged between 40 and 75 years. Aim of the video demonstration is to achieve a better concordance of physical activity reports with accelerometer-based measurements.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study examines whether the demonstration of different intensity levels of physical activity by video in the context of a tablet PC (personal computer)-based survey can achieve a higher degree of concordance between self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity compared to an assessment without video demonstration. The recruitment of the study participants in the age range between 40 and 75 years takes place in a shopping center in the city Greifswald in Germany.

Informed consent consists of: (i) activity recording over 7 days using an accelerometer, (ii) completion of standardized questionnaires, (iii) participation in a standardized measurement of weight and height as well as waist and hip circumference.

Participants are asked to wear an accelerometer during the day for a period of 7 days. Subsequently, a questionnaire about the frequency, duration and intensity of physical activity in the last 7 days will be answered in the DZHK (Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung)- examination center. Prior to the physical activity assessment the study participants are randomly assigned to the study conditions "Video" or "No Video" (ratio 1:1). Optionally, participants may receive feedback on their physical activity measured by accelerometer upon completion of the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Physical Activity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

"Video"-group

Video group: Individuals in this group receive the intervention "Video demonstration of physical activity intensity levels". They watch a 3-minute-video explaining and visualizing light-, moderate-, and vigorous-intensity levels of physical activity before completing a tablet PC-supported physical activity assessment at the DZHK-examination center.The video can not be skipped.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Video demonstration of physical activity intensity levels

Intervention Type OTHER

In the video demonstration, an approximately 50 year old male explains 1) light-intensity, 2) moderate-intensity, and 3) vigorous-intensity physical activity referring to differences in heart rate, breathing frequency and capability to talk normally. Simultaneously, on a treadmill he demonstrates the body signs of the three intensity levels. He gives examples and points out that there are individual differences in the intensity evaluation of comparable activities.

"No video"-group

No video group: Individuals in this group do not receive the intervention "Video demonstration of physical activity intensity levels". They complete a tablet PC-supported physical activity assessment at the DZHK-examination center without receiving a 3-minute-video explaining and visualizing the different intensity levels of physical activity.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Video demonstration of physical activity intensity levels

In the video demonstration, an approximately 50 year old male explains 1) light-intensity, 2) moderate-intensity, and 3) vigorous-intensity physical activity referring to differences in heart rate, breathing frequency and capability to talk normally. Simultaneously, on a treadmill he demonstrates the body signs of the three intensity levels. He gives examples and points out that there are individual differences in the intensity evaluation of comparable activities.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\-

Exclusion Criteria

* cognitive impairment
* inadequate language skills
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung (DZHK)

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Medicine Greifswald

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institute of Social Medicine and Prevention, University Medicine Greifswald

Greifswald, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Voigt L, Ullrich A, Gross S, Guertler D, Jaeschke L, Dorr M, van den Berg N, John U, Ulbricht S. Associations of accelerometer-based sedentary bouts with adiposity markers among German adults - results from a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;23(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15304-8.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36899317 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

GAP05/18

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.