Epidural Methadone in Healthy Volunteers

NCT ID: NCT03525509

Last Updated: 2019-09-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

EARLY_PHASE1

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-06-04

Study Completion Date

2019-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Epidurally administered opioid pain medications are important tools for postoperative pain control, but each agent has its own limitations. Methadone's properties suggest that it may provide a long duration of pain control with minimal side effects related to spread to the brain or absorption into the blood stream. In this study, the investigators aim to compare the relative pain relieving effects, markers of side effects, and concentrations in the blood of epidurally administered methadone as compared to another long-acting opioid which is commonly administered epidurally, morphine.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Acute postoperative pain control remains a major challenge in healthcare, with a need to balance analgesic effectiveness, patient safety, and cost. Excellent analgesia is a universal clinical imperative, but our current approaches are often inadequate. Epidural opioids can be useful tools, but each carries its own strengths and limitations. Bolus morphine is long lasting but exhibits rostral spread in the cerebrospinal fluid, which raises risks of adverse effects, particularly late-onset respiratory depression. Lipophilic opioids such as fentanyl and sufentanil exhibit selective segmental analgesia but are of short duration due to systemic absorption. As such, they require continuous epidural administration via an indwelling epidural catheter and a pump (patient-controlled or continuous infusion), which has implications for nursing, pain management services, and hospital cost. Methadone's physico-chemical properties suggest that epidural methadone administration would be ideal in providing long-duration analgesia with fewer of the adverse effects seen with medications like morphine.

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of two medications given epidurally: morphine and methadone. We will do so using a randomized, double-blinded, crossover design study. During each of two study visits, participants will receive a single epidural bolus of either morphine or methadone. We will examine the ability of the medication to blunt pain from heat or pressure using quantitative sensory testing at both the dermatome of injection (leg) and a distant dermatome (face); in doing so, we will demonstrate relative segmental versus supraspinal or systemic opioid activity. Additionally, we will assess signs and symptoms of supraspinal opioid activity, which may predispose to adverse effects, and blood concentrations of each medication. Each of the aforementioned measurements will be conducted at multiple points over a 24 hour period. Following a washout period, patients will return for a second visit, at which time the protocol will be repeated using the other medication.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Acute

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Randomized, double-blinded, crossover design in healthy volunteers
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
At enrollment, each participant will be assigned a study number, which will match a previously prepared computer-generated list of randomization numbers to determine the interventions. Pharmacy staff who prepares blinded syringes of medications for administration will not be involved in medication administration, outcomes assessment, or statistical analysis. The participants and all other study personnel will be blinded to the treatment allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Epidural methadone

A single 4mg epidural bolus of methadone hydrochloride

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Methadone hydrochloride

Intervention Type DRUG

Epidural bolus of 4mg of preservative free methadone hydrochloride (4mL of 1mg/mL solution)

Epidural morphine

A single 4mg epidural bolus of morphine sulfate

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Morphine Sulfate

Intervention Type DRUG

Epidural bolus of 4mg of preservative free morphine sulfate (4mL of 1mg/mL solution)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Methadone hydrochloride

Epidural bolus of 4mg of preservative free methadone hydrochloride (4mL of 1mg/mL solution)

Intervention Type DRUG

Morphine Sulfate

Epidural bolus of 4mg of preservative free morphine sulfate (4mL of 1mg/mL solution)

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Epidural methadone Epidural morphine

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age ≥18;
2. Body mass index between 18.5 and 30
3. Good general health with no remarkable medical conditions;
4. Able and willing to provide informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Known history of hepatic, renal, and cardiac disease;
2. Known history of diabetes mellitus;
3. Chronic pain;
4. A skin or spine condition preventing safe epidural catheter placement;
5. Current pregnancy or lactation;
6. Known coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulant use which contraindicates epidural catheter placement;
7. Known allergic reactions to opioids or local anesthetics;
8. History of current or prior substance use disorder or positive screen using the 4-question Simple Screening Instrument for Substance Abuse (SSI-SA).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

simon.haroutounian

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

simon.haroutounian

Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology, Chief of Clinical Research for Washington University Pain Center

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simon Haroutounian, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University in Saint Louis

Yehuda Ginosar, MBBS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Washington University in Saint Louis

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Washington University in St. Louis

St Louis, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shir Y, Rosen G, Zeldin A, Davidson EM. Methadone is safe for treating hospitalized patients with severe pain. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Dec;48(11):1109-13. doi: 10.1007/BF03020377.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11744587 (View on PubMed)

Haroutiunian S, Kagan L, Yifrach-Damari I, Davidson E, Ratz Y, Hoffman A. Enhanced antinociceptive efficacy of epidural compared with i.v. methadone in a rat model of thermal nociception. Br J Anaesth. 2014 Jan;112(1):150-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet234. Epub 2013 Jul 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23842610 (View on PubMed)

Bernards CM, Shen DD, Sterling ES, Adkins JE, Risler L, Phillips B, Ummenhofer W. Epidural, cerebrospinal fluid, and plasma pharmacokinetics of epidural opioids (part 1): differences among opioids. Anesthesiology. 2003 Aug;99(2):455-65. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00029.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12883420 (View on PubMed)

Gedney JA, Liu EH. Side-effects of epidural infusions of opioid bupivacaine mixtures. Anaesthesia. 1998 Dec;53(12):1148-55. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00636.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10193215 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

201802099

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Divided or Single Exposure (DOSE) Study
NCT05459402 RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Study of D-Methadone in Patients With Chronic Pain
NCT00588640 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2