Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Single Ascending Doses of REL-1017 (d-Methadone)

NCT ID: NCT03637361

Last Updated: 2019-08-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-12-04

Study Completion Date

2015-06-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluated the safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of d-methadone in a limited dose range, in single administrations in humans.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This was a phase 1, single-center study carried out in healthy male and female subjects to investigate the safety, tolerability, and PK of d-methadone. This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study in 6 sequential cohorts of healthy subjects. Single oral doses of d-methadone were investigated in sequential cohorts. The proposed doses were 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, and 400 mg. The decision to enroll the sequential cohort at the next dose level was based on the safety data and available PK data from previous doses. Dose escalation depended on the emergence of dose-limiting AEs and review of the safety data. Progression to the next higher dose only occurred if the previous dose level was deemed to be safe and well tolerated by the investigator, safety review team, and sponsor. Of the 8 subjects in each cohort, 2 subjects received placebo and 6 subjects received d-methadone.

Subjects were admitted the day prior to receiving the study drug and remained in the clinical research unit (CRU) under clinical supervision for at least 72 hours post-dose. At the discretion of the investigator or designee, the confinement time could have been extended to ensure the safety of each subject. Visits 3 and 4 were follow-up visits approximately 6±2 days and 10±2 days, respectively, after drug administration.

Based on the blinded safety data from Cohorts 1 to 4, single doses of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, and 100 mg of d-methadone or placebo were well tolerated and there were no dose-limiting AEs.

During all cohorts, subjects were evaluated for safety (AEs, vital signs, electrocardiograms \[ECGs\], cardiac telemetry, pulse oximetry, clinical laboratory tests), tolerability, and PK. The following signs of opioid toxicity were deemed to be of special interest:

* sustained respiratory depression that results in oxygen saturation below 92%
* QTc prolongation (\>500 ms or \>70 ms above the baseline)
* protracted nausea and vomiting
* any AE deemed by the investigator to be dose-limiting Safety Analysis Safety and tolerability parameters were listed by treatment and subject and displayed in summary tables using descriptive statistics.

Original terms used to identify AEs were coded using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), version 17.1. The number and percentage of subjects with treatment emergent AEs (TEAEs) were summarized by system organ class, preferred term, and treatment and for each treatment by maximum intensity and maximum relationship to study treatment.

Descriptive statistics for vital signs were calculated and presented for each time point by treatment (absolute values and change from baseline). ECG results (absolute values and change from baseline \[average of triplicate assessments, where applicable\]) were summarized using descriptive statistics; frequencies (numbers and percentages) were calculated for the overall evaluation by scheduled time and treatment. Laboratory data were summarized by the type of test and scheduled visit. Descriptive statistics and number of subjects with laboratory test results below, within, and above normal ranges were tabulated by scheduled time. Abnormal findings in laboratory data were listed with a flag for clinical significance. Medical history abnormalities were coded to MedDRA terms. Physical examination abnormalities were also listed. The original verbatim terms for concomitant medications were coded into drug class and preferred term. These data were listed.

Pharmacokinetic Analysis The PK parameters for d-methadone determined by non-compartmental analysis were summarized by dose. Graphs of concentration (linear and log-linear) vs time were generated. Descriptive statistics were calculated by dose and time point for all d-methadone concentrations. Concentrations below the limit of quantification (BLQ) were set to zero for the generation of summary statistics and mean concentration-time plots.

For the calculation of the PK parameters, concentration-time data were treated as follows: BLQ concentrations prior to the first quantifiable concentration were set to zero; BLQ concentrations after the first quantifiable concentration were treated as missing; pre-dose sampling times relative to dosing were set to zero. Descriptive statistics were calculated by dose. The dose proportionality of Cmax and AUC was assessed by the Hummel method. Tmax and t½ for different doses were compared using the Kruskall-Wallis test to determine whether there was any difference among the treatment groups, and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for contrasts.

Pharmacodynamic Analysis The PD data at each time point were summarized by descriptive statistics and presented graphically (as appropriate). Derived endpoints were summarized using descriptive statistics.

Outliers were listed by measure and parameter. Pupillometry constriction was listed and grouped by dose and subject with descriptive statistics for changes from baseline for different time points.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Neuropathic Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Arm 1

100 mL Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Arm 2

REL-1017 5 mg in 100 mL of Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REL-1017

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigational product, REL-1017 is prepared as a solution with Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice on site to obtain a final volume of 100 mL for dosing. The study drug will be administered as a solution of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg or 200 mg REL-1017, based on randomization prepared in Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice with a final volume of 100 mL

Arm 3

REL-1017 20 mg in 100 mL of Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REL-1017

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigational product, REL-1017 is prepared as a solution with Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice on site to obtain a final volume of 100 mL for dosing. The study drug will be administered as a solution of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg or 200 mg REL-1017, based on randomization prepared in Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice with a final volume of 100 mL

Arm 4

REL-1017 60 mg in 100 mL of Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REL-1017

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigational product, REL-1017 is prepared as a solution with Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice on site to obtain a final volume of 100 mL for dosing. The study drug will be administered as a solution of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg or 200 mg REL-1017, based on randomization prepared in Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice with a final volume of 100 mL

Arm 5

REL-1017 100 mg in 100 mL of Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REL-1017

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigational product, REL-1017 is prepared as a solution with Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice on site to obtain a final volume of 100 mL for dosing. The study drug will be administered as a solution of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg or 200 mg REL-1017, based on randomization prepared in Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice with a final volume of 100 mL

Arm 6

REL-1017 150 mg in 100 mL of Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

REL-1017

Intervention Type DRUG

The investigational product, REL-1017 is prepared as a solution with Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice on site to obtain a final volume of 100 mL for dosing. The study drug will be administered as a solution of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg or 200 mg REL-1017, based on randomization prepared in Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice with a final volume of 100 mL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

REL-1017

The investigational product, REL-1017 is prepared as a solution with Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice on site to obtain a final volume of 100 mL for dosing. The study drug will be administered as a solution of 5 mg, 20 mg, 60 mg, 100 mg, 150 mg or 200 mg REL-1017, based on randomization prepared in Ocean Spray® Diet Cranberry Juice with a final volume of 100 mL

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

(d-Methadone)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. healthy male or female subjects, 18 to 55 years of age, inclusive
2. body mass index (BMI) within the range of 18.0 to 30.0 kg/m2, inclusive, and a minimum weight of 50.0 kg
3. non-smoker for at least 3 months and tested negative on a breath carbon monoxide (CO) test
4. male subjects of reproductive potential must have been using and willing to continue using medically acceptable contraception from screening and for at least 2 months after the last study drug administration
5. female subjects of childbearing potential must have been using and willing to continue using medically acceptable contraception for at least 1 month prior to screening (at least 3 months for oral, transdermal, vaginal ring contraceptives) and for at least 2 months after last study drug administration
6. female subjects of non-childbearing potential must have met the criteria defined in the clinical protocol
7. able to speak, read, and understand English sufficiently to allow completion of all study assessments
8. must have understood and provided written informed consent, prior to the initiation of any protocol-specific procedures

Exclusion Criteria

1. self-reported substance or alcohol dependence (excluding nicotine and caffeine) within the past 2 years, and/or subjects who had ever been in a substance or alcohol rehabilitation program to treat their substance or alcohol dependence
2. subject-reported family history of substance abuse in an immediate family member (i.e., parent, sibling, or child)
3. history or presence of clinically significant abnormality as assessed by physical examination, medical history, 12-lead ECG, vital signs, or laboratory values, which in the opinion of the investigator would jeopardize the safety of the subject or the validity of the study results
4. chronic use of prescribed opioids (i.e., \>120 days in a 6-month period) or any recreational use of opioids
5. evidence of clinically significant hepatic or renal impairment, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \>1.5× upper limit of normal (ULN) or bilirubin \>1× ULN
6. history or family history of sudden unexplained death or long QT syndrome
7. QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF) \>450 ms in females or \>430 ms in males
8. history of hypotension
9. history or presence of any condition in which an opioid was contraindicated (e.g., significant respiratory depression, acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercarbia, bronchitis, or had/was suspected of having paralytic ileus)
10. history of status asthmaticus, chronic pulmonary disease, or severe allergic reaction (including anaphylaxis) to any substance
11. use of an opioid within the 6 months prior to screening
12. use of a prohibited medication
13. positive urine drug screen
14. positive breath alcohol test; subjects with a positive result may have been rescheduled at the investigator's discretion
15. female subjects who were currently pregnant (had a positive pregnancy test)
16. history of allergy or hypersensitivity to methadone or related drugs (e.g., opioids)
17. positive for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
18. donation or loss of more than 500 mL of whole blood within 30 days prior to first drug administration
19. difficulty with venous access or unsuitable or unwilling to undergo catheter insertion
20. treatment with an investigational drug within 5 times the elimination half-life, if known (e.g., a marketed product) or within 30 days (if the elimination half-life is unknown) prior to first drug administration or was concurrently enrolled in any research judged not to be scientifically or medically compatible with this study
21. an employee of the sponsor or research site personnel directly affiliated with this study or their immediate family member, defined as a spouse, parent, sibling, or child, whether biological or legally adopted
22. a subject who, in the opinion of the investigator or designee, was considered unsuitable or unlikely to comply with the study protocol for any reason
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Relmada Therapeutics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

REL-1017-111

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study of D-Methadone in Patients With Chronic Pain
NCT00588640 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Epidural Methadone in Healthy Volunteers
NCT03525509 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1
Divided or Single Exposure (DOSE) Study
NCT05459402 RECRUITING PHASE2/PHASE3
Effects of Dronabinol in Opioid Maintained Patients
NCT04025359 RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1
PO Methadone Ortho Outpatient
NCT06351215 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE3