Long-Term Opioid Therapy in Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: Risks and Benefits
NCT ID: NCT06063902
Last Updated: 2023-10-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
1000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-01-14
2027-01-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is hypothesized that certain biopsychosocial factors mapped in this study predict patterns of opioid use and the risk for developing OUD for patients with CNCP on long-term opioid therapy. Further, it is hypothesized that certain biopsychosocial factors mapped in this study predict the chance of improved work ability and other treatment benefits of long term opioid therapy in patients with CNCP.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Prospective Investigation of the Risks of Opioid Misuse, Abuse, and Addiction Among Patients Treated With Opioids for the Treatment of Chronic Pain
NCT02751762
Health Outcomes From Opioid Therapy for Chronic Pain
NCT00495404
Improved Treatment for Patients With Long-term Opioid Therapy for Non-cancer Pain in Primary Care
NCT06856733
Acute Pain Episodes in Patients Under Opioid Maintenance Therapy : Clinical Management and Long Term Effects
NCT00738036
Opioid Rotation From Morphine to Methadone in Treatment of Non-malignant Pain
NCT00356083
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Opioids are known to be effective for acute and post-operative pain, and can be indispensable in palliative treatment of cancer pain. Long-term opioid therapy on the other hand is associated witg several risks, e.g., development of opioid dependence and opioid use disorder (OUD), and other opioid related complications including premature death. Clinical experience, qualitative and quantitative research suggest that some individuals with chronic pain do benefit from long-term opioid therapy in terms of clinical significant pain relief with only a low level of negative side-effects. However, evidence of change in functional outcomes and health related quality of life is ambiguous. Therefore, the role of long-term opioid therapy in chronic pain conditions remains debated and sometimes controversial.
In contrast to the well-established opioid epidemic in the U.S., little is known about the use of prescribed opioids in Sweden, and how this has developed during the last decade. The annual prevalence of opioid prescription did not change much during 2006-2017, but there were significant shifts in choice of opioids, with an increase in strong opioids e.g., oxycodone and morphine. Very little is known about what clinical consequences this shift might lead to.
The U-PAIN cohort study aims to examine patterns of prescribed opioid use, risks of adverse effects of long-term opioid therapy, and benefits of long-term opioid therapy, in a prospective clinical cohort.
The study aims to complete a broad bio-psycho-social characterization of the participants relevant to chronic pain. The study participants are followed over 5 years in order to study trajectories for patterns of opioid use, and predictive factors for opioid use disorder, work ability, pain severity and interference, and health-related quality of life.
At baseline, participants will be classified into 4 groups based on their current use of opioids:
1. No use
2. Short-term or intermittent use Criteria: short-term use defined as regular use of opioids for \< 3 months or intermittent use as dosing up to 10 days/months (independent of time frame).
3. Long-term use with low to moderate doses Criteria: use of opioids for more \> 3 months, more the 10 days/month and mean daily dose \< 40 mg (oral morphine milligram equivalent dose (MEE) defined as low dose. Mean daily dose 40-100 mg MEE defined as high dose.
4. Long-term use with high doses Criteria: use of opioids for \> 3 months. More than 100 mg MEE.
Main research questions for the cohort study are:
1. What characterizes patients without opioid use disorder at baseline compared to patients with mild, moderate or severe opioid use disorder respectively at baseline?
2. What variables predict their future:
1. Patterns of opioid use and substance use disorder?
2. Work ability, activity interference, quality of life and pain?
Potential predictors and co-variates include: (1) Individual factor and demographic variables (2) Pain characteristics, (3) Psychiatric co-morbidity and susceptibility for OUD, (3) Cognitive-behavioral variables, and (4) Physical functioning.
The objective is to identify the most salient predictors from each group and combine them into a final model with the best goodness of fit.
The four groups concerning patterns of opioid use will be statistically compared regarding key outcomes at baseline (opioid use disorders, work ability, activity interference, pain and HQoL)) by use of t-tests and chi-square tests. Logistic regression analyses will be applied for the study of predictors of opioid use, OUD, work ability, activity interference and pain. The dependent variables, e.g. OUD/no OUD will be regressed towards hypothetic predictors, grouped as described earlier, to end up with a final model including the most salient predictors from each group of variables. Multivariate regression models will be considered for continuous dependent variables.
In addition this clinical cohort will be open for other studies after ethical vetting, i.e. the cohort is unique and could contribute to further understanding of this population and hence should be open for further research.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Competent in Swedish
3. Chronic Non-Cancer Pain (pain \> 90 days)
Exclusion Criteria
2. In palliative care
3. Need for interpreter
4. Cognitive impairment of magnitude that will prevent completion of study or ability to give informed consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uppsala University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Pernilla Åsenlöf, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Uppsala University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Uppsala Univeristy Hospital
Uppsala, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2016/376
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.