Comparison of Low and High Ligation With Apical Lymph Node Dissection in the Laparoscopy Rectal Cancer

NCT ID: NCT03498885

Last Updated: 2020-09-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

466 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2025-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to explore the different impacts of high and low ligation in laparoscopic rectal interior resection on postoperative anastomotic leakage and proximal bowel necrosis and stenosis, as well as the quality of life and long-term survival. In the anterior resection of rectum, the section level of inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) is still a controversial subject between the advocates of high and low ligation. The low ligation is defined as the IMA is ligated below the origin of the left colic artery while the high ligation refers to the IMA is ligated at its origin from the aorta. Nowadays the spread of laparoscopy has encouraged more frequent execution of the high ligation, which appears easier to achieve than the low ligation and also with the advantage of lower anastomosis traction but with the disadvantage of worse vascularization of the stumps as well.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

It has long been debated that whether to tie off the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) at its origin or just below the origin of the left colic artery (LCA) of the anterior resection of the rectum. Thus far, no clear consensus has been achieved, and the level of arterial ligation still varies among institutions and patients. In the previous studies, high or low ligation takes advantage on both sides. However, there are still some researches that have demonstrated no significant difference had been found in the incidence of anastomotic leakage and other complications between the high and low ligation groups. Therefore, to provide a clear and definite answer to surgeons of how they should deal with the IMA in laparoscopy rectal surgery. We plan to explore the impacts of high and low tie in laparoscopic anterior rectal resection on postoperative anastomotic leakage and proximal bowel necrosis and stenosis, as well as the quality of life and long-term survival by prospective and multi-center clinical trial.

Surgery will be described as follows:

For low ligation group:

1. Laparoscopic surgery is performed. Tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery, LCA is preserved. Lymphadenectomy to Apical lymph nodes is performed. Strip the beginning part of upper rectal artery and the first sigmoid artery. Strip the left colic artery until reaching the inferior mesenteric vein (IMV). The abdominal aorta lymph nodes need to be cleaned if it's been spotted swollen.
2. Vascular ligation level: Left colonic artery needs to be preserved, the rectal artery and the first sigmoid artery are ligated. Ligate inferior mesenteric artery below left colonic artery come across the inferior mesenteric vein level.

For high ligation groups:

Laparoscopic surgery is performed. The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm. from its origin. Dissect the adipose tissue and lymph nodes around IMA. The inferior mesenteric vein (IMV) is divided and ligated below the duodenal margin. The abdominal aorta lymph nodes need to be cleaned if it's been spotted swollen. For both groups Total Mesolectal Excision (TME) is performed according to the principles of Heald.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Rectal Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Procedure: Low ligation with apical lymph node dissection

Procedure: High ligation with apical lymph node dissection
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low ligation

Left colic artery (LCA) is identified, tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery,Apical lymph node dissection with the left colic artery preservation is performed.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Low ligation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Left colic artery (LCA) is identified, Tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery, Apical lymph node dissection with the left colic artery preservation is performed.

High ligation

The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. Apical lymph nodes dissection is performed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

High ligation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. Apicallymph nodes dissection is performed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Low ligation

Left colic artery (LCA) is identified, Tie the sigmoid artery and superior rectal artery, Apical lymph node dissection with the left colic artery preservation is performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

High ligation

The IMA is ligated and divided at 2 cm from its origin. Apicallymph nodes dissection is performed.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

LL HL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 Years to 75 Years (Adult, Senior).
* Colonoscopy and pathology shows rectal or sigmoid adenocarcinoma.
* Tumor located at 4-15 cm from the dentate line.
* The clinical staging of tumor by MRI within T1-4a when tumor Above the peritoneum and T3N0-2 when tumor below the peritoneum.
* Receive or not receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on 5-fluorouracil before surgery and radical resection is available after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
* Anus-saving operation is available.
* ASA class: I-III.
* Well tolerate to general anesthesia.
* ECOG score: 0-1.
* Patients - can understand and are willing to take part in the clinical trial.

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe cardiovascular disease, uncontrollable infection or other severe complications.
* Severe mental illness.
* Suffer with other carcinoma simultaneously or sequentially in 5 years.
* Familial polyposis coli or Multiple -colorectal tumor.
* History of abdominal surgery and with severe abdominal adhesions.
* Combine with acute intestinal obstruction, intestinal bleeding, intestinal perforation and emergency surgery is needed.
* Multiple organs resection surgery is needed.
* Abdominoperineal resection need to be performed.
* ASA class: IV to V.
* Pregnant, suckling period or reject to birth control.
* Patient who unable to go through the clinical trial because of familial,social or religious factors.
* Refuse to take part in the trial.
* Patients without an informed consent.
* Non-compliant patient
* The patient or their family members want to withdraw from the clinical trial.
* Loss to follow-up
* Researchers think the participants need to withdraw from the clinical trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

WEIDONG LIU,MD

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

WEIDONG LIU,MD

Head of Department of General Surgery

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wei dong Liu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Xi Xie, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Xiangya Hospital of Central South University

Changsha, Hunan, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ting Zou, MD

Role: CONTACT

0086-15874865802

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Liu wei dong, doctor

Role: primary

0086-13873124855

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Milnerowicz S, Milnerowicz A, Tabola R. A middle mesenteric artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2012 Dec;34(10):973-5. doi: 10.1007/s00276-012-0987-y. Epub 2012 Jul 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22820922 (View on PubMed)

Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373-83. doi: 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3558716 (View on PubMed)

Kim DI, Han SH. A rare branching pattern of hindgut: absence of inferior mesenteric artery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2017 Jul;39(7):803-806. doi: 10.1007/s00276-016-1770-2. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27999945 (View on PubMed)

Vermeer TA, Orsini RG, Daams F, Nieuwenhuijzen GA, Rutten HJ. Anastomotic leakage and presacral abscess formation after locally advanced rectal cancer surgery: Incidence, risk factors and treatment. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Nov;40(11):1502-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Apr 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24745995 (View on PubMed)

Abe T, Ujiie A, Taguchi Y, Satoh S, Shibuya T, Jun Y, Isogai S, Satoh YI. Anomalous inferior mesenteric artery supplying the ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colons. Anat Sci Int. 2018 Jan;93(1):144-148. doi: 10.1007/s12565-017-0401-2. Epub 2017 Apr 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28386743 (View on PubMed)

Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, Heald RJ, Moran B, Ulrich A, Holm T, Wong WD, Tiret E, Moriya Y, Laurberg S, den Dulk M, van de Velde C, Buchler MW. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010 Mar;147(3):339-51. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.10.012. Epub 2009 Dec 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20004450 (View on PubMed)

Smedh K, Sverrisson I, Chabok A, Nikberg M; HAPIrect Collaborative Study Group. Hartmann's procedure vs abdominoperineal resection with intersphincteric dissection in patients with rectal cancer: a randomized multicentre trial (HAPIrect). BMC Surg. 2016 Jul 11;16(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0161-2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27401339 (View on PubMed)

Hida J, Yasutomi M, Maruyama T, Uchida T, Nakajima A, Wakano T, Tokoro T, Kubo R. High ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery with hypogastric nerve preservation in rectal cancer surgery. Surg Today. 1999;29(5):482-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02483047.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10333426 (View on PubMed)

Mari G, Maggioni D, Costanzi A, Miranda A, Rigamonti L, Crippa J, Magistro C, Di Lernia S, Forgione A, Carnevali P, Nichelatti M, Carzaniga P, Valenti F, Rovagnati M, Berselli M, Cocozza E, Livraghi L, Origi M, Scandroglio I, Roscio F, De Luca A, Ferrari G, Pugliese R. "High or low Inferior Mesenteric Artery ligation in Laparoscopic low Anterior Resection: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial" (HIGHLOW trial). Trials. 2015 Jan 27;16:21. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0537-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25623323 (View on PubMed)

Titu LV, Tweedle E, Rooney PS. High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in curative surgery for left colonic and rectal cancers: a systematic review. Dig Surg. 2008;25(2):148-57. doi: 10.1159/000128172. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18446037 (View on PubMed)

Hall NR, Finan PJ, Stephenson BM, Lowndes RH, Young HL. High tie of the inferior mesenteric artery in distal colorectal resections--a safe vascular procedure. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):29-32. doi: 10.1007/BF00337583.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7745320 (View on PubMed)

Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Trastulli S, Desiderio J, Di Rocco G, Covarelli P, Santoro A, Giustozzi G, Redler A, Avenia N, Rulli A, Noya G, Boselli C. High tie versus low tie of the inferior mesenteric artery: a protocol for a systematic review. World J Surg Oncol. 2011 Nov 9;9:147. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-9-147.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22071020 (View on PubMed)

Bertrand MM, Delmond L, Mazars R, Ripoche J, Macri F, Prudhomme M. Is low tie ligation truly reproducible in colorectal cancer surgery? Anatomical study of the inferior mesenteric artery division branches. Surg Radiol Anat. 2014 Dec;36(10):1057-62. doi: 10.1007/s00276-014-1281-y. Epub 2014 Mar 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24633578 (View on PubMed)

BERNSTEIN WC, BERNSTEIN EF. Ischemic ulcerative colitis following inferior mesenteric arterial ligation. Dis Colon Rectum. 1963 Jan-Feb;6:54-61. doi: 10.1007/BF02617232. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 13967713 (View on PubMed)

Francone E, Bonfante P, Bruno MS, Intersimone D, Falco E, Berti S. Laparoscopic Inferior Mesenteric Artery Peeling: An Alternative to High or Low Vascular Ligation for Sigmoid Colon Cancer Resection. World J Surg. 2016 Nov;40(11):2790-2795. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3611-1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27334448 (View on PubMed)

Zhang W, Lou Z, Liu Q, Meng R, Gong H, Hao L, Liu P, Sun G, Ma J, Zhang W. Multicenter analysis of risk factors for anastomotic leakage after middle and low rectal cancer resection without diverting stoma: a retrospective study of 319 consecutive patients. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Oct;32(10):1431-1437. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2875-8. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28766076 (View on PubMed)

Miyamoto R, Nagai K, Kemmochi A, Inagawa S, Yamamoto M. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the vascular arrangement including the inferior mesenteric artery and left colic artery in laparoscope-assisted colorectal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2016 Oct;30(10):4400-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4758-4. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26850027 (View on PubMed)

Michelson H, Bolund C, Nilsson B, Brandberg Y. Health-related quality of life measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30--reference values from a large sample of Swedish population. Acta Oncol. 2000;39(4):477-84. doi: 10.1080/028418600750013384.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11041109 (View on PubMed)

Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97. doi: 10.1007/BF02050307.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8416784 (View on PubMed)

Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O'Leary MP, Bruskewitz RC, Holtgrewe HL, Mebust WK, Cockett AT. The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol. 1992 Nov;148(5):1549-57; discussion 1564. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36966-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1279218 (View on PubMed)

Rosen RC, Cappelleri JC, Smith MD, Lipsky J, Pena BM. Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res. 1999 Dec;11(6):319-26. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900472.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10637462 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CCRS-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.