P4 Peptide in Community Acquired Pneumonia

NCT ID: NCT03497962

Last Updated: 2025-03-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-01-31

Study Completion Date

2014-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The investigators' aim is to find out whether immune cells from patients with a severe chest infection will react ex vivo to a new immunomodulating peptide, P4 as part of augmented passive immunotherapy

The investigators know that P4 treatment can successfully improve the efficiency of specialized immune cells responsible for killing bacteria. The investigators also know that P4 treatment is effective in healthy human volunteers but wish to extend this observation to patients that have infection, as immune cells may react differently in these patients. If this study is successful, the investigators hope to be moving closer to a new treatment against severe bacterial infections.

The investigators plan to recruit patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and healthy volunteers, using carefully established inclusion and exclusions criteria with severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and obtain both blood and (if clinically feasible), a bronchoscopy BAL sample (washing of lung tissue).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators will examine the response to P4 peptide of alveolar macrophages from bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and neutrophils from peripheral blood collected from patients with severe pneumonia admitted to the ITU.

The investigators expect to show improved phagocytosis, oxidative burst, cellular activation (flow cytometry, electron microscopy, cytokine production, transcriptomics) and bacterial killing when P4 is used to stimulate immune cells and this may lead to a novel approach to the treatment of severe infections.

The investigators will also examine the effect of P4 on alveolar macrophages and neutrophils from healthy volunteers in order to ensure comparability with previously published results and extend observations using S.pneumoniae to other causes of severe pneumonia including E.coli, Salmonellae, M.tuberculosis and Pseudomonas.

Augmented passive immunotherapy (API) is a novel potential treatment strategy to combat fulminant bacterial infections. It consists of two components

1. a peptide that enhances bacterial uptake and killing by phagocytes.
2. exogenous antibody (provided with intravenous immunoglobulin, a licensed medicinal product) which optimizes the phagocytosis. Previous studies of API have included extensive murine studies of acute and chronic bacterial infection with several different organisms. P4 has also been tested in aged mice and in mucosal administration.

The investigators will recruit patients with severe community acquired pneumonia on ICU and healthy volunteers using carefully established inclusion and exclusions criteria.

This research seeks to establish proof-of-concept for augmented passive immunotherapy in patients with severe pneumonia. Patients with mild to moderate pneumonia often respond to antibiotic therapy but those with severe community-acquired pneumonia who require admission to Intensive Care have a hospital mortality of 49.4%, despite antibiotics and optimal supportive care. These patients represent 6% of all admissions to Intensive Care Units in the UK. Strategies to improve clinical outcome for this group of patients are much needed and the investigators' research cohort has been selected to represent this group. The immunological characteristics of patients with overwhelming sepsis are likely to differ from patients with milder infection. Immune cells taken from patients with milder forms of sepsis may not respond to in vitro stimulation in the same way as cells taken from severely septic patients and therefore should not be used to establish proof-of-concept for a therapy intended for critically ill patients on Intensive Care.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pneumonia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ITU patients

25 patients will be recruited from the Intensive Care Unit/ High dependency unit Inclusion- Adults (\>18years) with community acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Venepuncture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Taken from established arterial or central lines in critical care setting or by experienced clinicians if no line available and in healthy volunteers.

Bronchoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Broncho-alveolar lavage to obtain alveolar macrophages

Healthy volunteer

24 healthy adult volunteers will be recruited to establish a comparison data set and to extend the laboratory observations to include other bacterial pathogens.

Venepuncture

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Taken from established arterial or central lines in critical care setting or by experienced clinicians if no line available and in healthy volunteers.

Bronchoscopy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Broncho-alveolar lavage to obtain alveolar macrophages

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Venepuncture

Taken from established arterial or central lines in critical care setting or by experienced clinicians if no line available and in healthy volunteers.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bronchoscopy

Broncho-alveolar lavage to obtain alveolar macrophages

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adults (\>18y) with community acquired pneumonia.
* Diagnosis of CAP upon hospital admission requires: Radiographic shadowing unexplained by other causes plus Symptoms/signs consistent with acute lower respiratory tract infection.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous hospital admission within 14 days (implies hospital acquired).
* Immunocompromising comorbidity or therapy (e.g. HIV infection, chemotherapy).
* Pregnancy.
* Deemed inappropriate by responsible Intensivist. Already recruited in to an interventional study (where the study therapy may influence the results of this study).
* Failure to obtain consent.


* The patient does not require a bronchoscopy for clinical reasons
* The patient is not invasively ventilated therefore not requiring a bronchoscopy
* The patient condition deteriorates prior to bronchoscopy such that they might no longer tolerate the procedure (e.g. those progressing to require high frequency oscillation, prone-positioning, PEEP\>15cmH2O or FiO2\>0.8 for ventilation).
* Patient does not tolerate bronchoscopy, i.e. if there is oxygen desaturation to \<90% for \>60 seconds or haemodynamic disturbance during the procedure.
* The intensive care clinician responsible for the patient develops any new concerns about the safety of bronchoscopy or bronchoalveolar lavage.


* Adults (\>18y).
* Able to give fully informed consent.
* Fluent English speaker.
* Non-smoking.
* Healthy adults without current illness.
* Contraindication to bronchoscopy or immunomodulatory medication.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephen B Gordon, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Royal Liverpool University Hospital/ Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Royal Liverpool University Hospital

Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

12/NW/0730

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TOFAcitinib in SARS-CoV2 Pneumonia
NCT04332042 UNKNOWN PHASE2
Human Lung Responses to Respiratory Pathogens
NCT01967628 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Understanding COVID-19
NCT04329546 COMPLETED