Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
32 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-01-31
2014-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The investigators know that P4 treatment can successfully improve the efficiency of specialized immune cells responsible for killing bacteria. The investigators also know that P4 treatment is effective in healthy human volunteers but wish to extend this observation to patients that have infection, as immune cells may react differently in these patients. If this study is successful, the investigators hope to be moving closer to a new treatment against severe bacterial infections.
The investigators plan to recruit patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and healthy volunteers, using carefully established inclusion and exclusions criteria with severe community acquired pneumonia (CAP) and obtain both blood and (if clinically feasible), a bronchoscopy BAL sample (washing of lung tissue).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Innate Immune Response During Community Acquired Pneumonia
NCT03379207
Exploratory Clinical Study of Neutrophil Activation Probe (NAP) for Optical Molecular Imaging in Human Lungs
NCT01532024
Innate Immune Response of Blood Cells in Patients With Pneumonia
NCT03231670
Effects of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Damage-associated Molecular Pattern Molecules on Long Term Use of Macrolides in Adults With Chronic Respiratory Disease
NCT05575726
Pneumococcal Carriage in Patients With Lower Respiratory Tract Infection (LRTI)
NCT01861184
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators expect to show improved phagocytosis, oxidative burst, cellular activation (flow cytometry, electron microscopy, cytokine production, transcriptomics) and bacterial killing when P4 is used to stimulate immune cells and this may lead to a novel approach to the treatment of severe infections.
The investigators will also examine the effect of P4 on alveolar macrophages and neutrophils from healthy volunteers in order to ensure comparability with previously published results and extend observations using S.pneumoniae to other causes of severe pneumonia including E.coli, Salmonellae, M.tuberculosis and Pseudomonas.
Augmented passive immunotherapy (API) is a novel potential treatment strategy to combat fulminant bacterial infections. It consists of two components
1. a peptide that enhances bacterial uptake and killing by phagocytes.
2. exogenous antibody (provided with intravenous immunoglobulin, a licensed medicinal product) which optimizes the phagocytosis. Previous studies of API have included extensive murine studies of acute and chronic bacterial infection with several different organisms. P4 has also been tested in aged mice and in mucosal administration.
The investigators will recruit patients with severe community acquired pneumonia on ICU and healthy volunteers using carefully established inclusion and exclusions criteria.
This research seeks to establish proof-of-concept for augmented passive immunotherapy in patients with severe pneumonia. Patients with mild to moderate pneumonia often respond to antibiotic therapy but those with severe community-acquired pneumonia who require admission to Intensive Care have a hospital mortality of 49.4%, despite antibiotics and optimal supportive care. These patients represent 6% of all admissions to Intensive Care Units in the UK. Strategies to improve clinical outcome for this group of patients are much needed and the investigators' research cohort has been selected to represent this group. The immunological characteristics of patients with overwhelming sepsis are likely to differ from patients with milder infection. Immune cells taken from patients with milder forms of sepsis may not respond to in vitro stimulation in the same way as cells taken from severely septic patients and therefore should not be used to establish proof-of-concept for a therapy intended for critically ill patients on Intensive Care.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ITU patients
25 patients will be recruited from the Intensive Care Unit/ High dependency unit Inclusion- Adults (\>18years) with community acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Venepuncture
Taken from established arterial or central lines in critical care setting or by experienced clinicians if no line available and in healthy volunteers.
Bronchoscopy
Broncho-alveolar lavage to obtain alveolar macrophages
Healthy volunteer
24 healthy adult volunteers will be recruited to establish a comparison data set and to extend the laboratory observations to include other bacterial pathogens.
Venepuncture
Taken from established arterial or central lines in critical care setting or by experienced clinicians if no line available and in healthy volunteers.
Bronchoscopy
Broncho-alveolar lavage to obtain alveolar macrophages
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Venepuncture
Taken from established arterial or central lines in critical care setting or by experienced clinicians if no line available and in healthy volunteers.
Bronchoscopy
Broncho-alveolar lavage to obtain alveolar macrophages
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of CAP upon hospital admission requires: Radiographic shadowing unexplained by other causes plus Symptoms/signs consistent with acute lower respiratory tract infection.
Exclusion Criteria
* Immunocompromising comorbidity or therapy (e.g. HIV infection, chemotherapy).
* Pregnancy.
* Deemed inappropriate by responsible Intensivist. Already recruited in to an interventional study (where the study therapy may influence the results of this study).
* Failure to obtain consent.
* The patient does not require a bronchoscopy for clinical reasons
* The patient is not invasively ventilated therefore not requiring a bronchoscopy
* The patient condition deteriorates prior to bronchoscopy such that they might no longer tolerate the procedure (e.g. those progressing to require high frequency oscillation, prone-positioning, PEEP\>15cmH2O or FiO2\>0.8 for ventilation).
* Patient does not tolerate bronchoscopy, i.e. if there is oxygen desaturation to \<90% for \>60 seconds or haemodynamic disturbance during the procedure.
* The intensive care clinician responsible for the patient develops any new concerns about the safety of bronchoscopy or bronchoalveolar lavage.
* Adults (\>18y).
* Able to give fully informed consent.
* Fluent English speaker.
* Non-smoking.
* Healthy adults without current illness.
* Contraindication to bronchoscopy or immunomodulatory medication.
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
OTHER
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephen B Gordon, Professor
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Royal Liverpool University Hospital/ Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Liverpool, Merseyside, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12/NW/0730
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.