Predictors of Difficult Videolaryngoscopy

NCT ID: NCT03495596

Last Updated: 2022-04-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1159 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-17

Study Completion Date

2020-03-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary goal of this study was to identify parameters affecting the failure of videolaryngoscopy in clinical practice; secondly, the incidence of videolaryngoscopy use and the most frequently used patient groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Videolaryngoscopy is widely used in the management of patients with presumed difficult airway. It offers an improved laryngeal view compared with direct laryngoscopy and increases the likelihood of successful intubation in patients for whom direct laryngoscopy is anticipated to be difficult. It is among the most frequently preferred difficult airway devices due to its ease of use, portability and direct laryngoscopy resemblance. The use of videolaryngoscopy has been shown to improve intubation success in many cases associated with difficult intubation, such as morbid obesity, pregnancy, limitation of cervical motility, and poor mouth opening.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Videolaryngoscopy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Videolaryngoscopy patients

The patients who were attempted to be intubated with videolaryngoscopy

Videolaryngoscopy

Intervention Type DEVICE

Videolaryngoscopy device type

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Videolaryngoscopy

Videolaryngoscopy device type

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients who used videolaryngoscopy for intubation

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Minimum Eligible Age

1 Day

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hacettepe University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Sevilay Kivrakoglu

HacettepeU

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Aysun Ankay Yilbas, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Sevilay Kivrakoglu, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Turkish Society of Anesthesiology and Reanimation

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hacettepe University Hospital

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aziz MF, Bayman EO, Van Tienderen MM, Todd MM; StAGE Investigator Group; Brambrink AM. Predictors of difficult videolaryngoscopy with GlideScope(R) or C-MAC(R) with D-blade: secondary analysis from a large comparative videolaryngoscopy trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;117(1):118-23. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew128.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27317711 (View on PubMed)

el-Ganzouri AR, McCarthy RJ, Tuman KJ, Tanck EN, Ivankovich AD. Preoperative airway assessment: predictive value of a multivariate risk index. Anesth Analg. 1996 Jun;82(6):1197-204. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199606000-00017.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8638791 (View on PubMed)

Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, Fu RF, Dillman D, Brambrink AM. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology. 2011 Jan;114(1):34-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182023eb7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21150569 (View on PubMed)

Toshniwal G, McKelvey GM, Wang H. STOP-Bang and prediction of difficult airway in obese patients. J Clin Anesth. 2014 Aug;26(5):360-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jul 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25081584 (View on PubMed)

Nakao K, Komasawa N, Kusaka Y, Minami T. Rapid-Sequence Intubation in the Left-Lateral Tilt Position in a Pregnant Woman with Premature Placental Abruption Utilizing a Videolaryngoscope. AJP Rep. 2015 Apr;5(1):e30-2. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1544109. Epub 2015 Feb 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26199794 (View on PubMed)

Kleine-Brueggeney M, Greif R, Schoettker P, Savoldelli GL, Nabecker S, Theiler LG. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 May;116(5):670-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew058.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27106971 (View on PubMed)

Mallampati SR, Gatt SP, Gugino LD, Desai SP, Waraksa B, Freiberger D, Liu PL. A clinical sign to predict difficult tracheal intubation: a prospective study. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1985 Jul;32(4):429-34. doi: 10.1007/BF03011357.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 4027773 (View on PubMed)

Wilson ME, Spiegelhalter D, Robertson JA, Lesser P. Predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1988 Aug;61(2):211-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/61.2.211.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3415893 (View on PubMed)

Nath G, Sekar M. Predicting difficult intubation--a comprehensive scoring system. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1997 Oct;25(5):482-6. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9702500505.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9352759 (View on PubMed)

Benumof JL. Management of the difficult adult airway. With special emphasis on awake tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1991 Dec;75(6):1087-110. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199112000-00021.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 1824555 (View on PubMed)

Williamson JA, Webb RK, Szekely S, Gillies ER, Dreosti AV. The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Difficult intubation: an analysis of 2000 incident reports. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1993 Oct;21(5):602-7. doi: 10.1177/0310057X9302100518.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8273882 (View on PubMed)

Nichol HC, Zuck D. Difficult laryngoscopy--the "anterior" larynx and the atlanto-occipital gap. Br J Anaesth. 1983 Feb;55(2):141-4. doi: 10.1093/bja/55.2.141.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6830676 (View on PubMed)

Oates JD, Macleod AD, Oates PD, Pearsall FJ, Howie JC, Murray GD. Comparison of two methods for predicting difficult intubation. Br J Anaesth. 1991 Mar;66(3):305-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/66.3.305.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2015145 (View on PubMed)

Charters P, Perera S, Horton WA. Visibility of pharyngeal structures as a predictor of difficult intubation. Anaesthesia. 1987 Oct;42(10):1115. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1987.tb05182.x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 3688398 (View on PubMed)

Cormack RS, Lehane J. Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics. Anaesthesia. 1984 Nov;39(11):1105-11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 6507827 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Videolaryngoscopy

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.