Cochlear Implantation in Pediatric Cases of Unilateral Hearing Loss
NCT ID: NCT02963974
Last Updated: 2021-08-06
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
20 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-04-20
2021-05-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Outcomes in Children With Pre-operative Residual Hearing
NCT03379870
Single-Sided Deafness in the Medicare Population
NCT05250414
Cochlear Implantation for Treatment of Single-sided Deafness
NCT02532972
Cochlear Implantation for Young Single-sided Deaf Children
NCT04738968
Single-sided Deafness and Cochlear Implants
NCT01749592
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Cochlear implantation performed for children with bilateral, severe to profound deafness has significant impacts on several aspects of child development.
The practice of providing cochlear implants to children who have significant hearing loss in one ear is of great interest and is occurring with greater frequency as reported in case studies and small set clinical reports. The primary purpose of this feasibility study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of cochlear implantation in children, age 3 years 6 months to 6 years, 6 months, with moderate to profound UHL. Postoperative results will be evaluated with speech perception measures, localization tasks, hearing in noise tasks, and subjective reports.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cochlear Implant
Pediatric patients with single sided deafness will receive a cochlear implant in the ear of loss
Cochlear implant
Implantation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cochlear implant
Implantation
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
1. Unaided residual hearing thresholds that yield a pure tone average (PTA) at frequencies 500 Hz, 1 kHz and 2 kHz of ≥70 dB HL in the ear to be implanted. It is possible that subjects may have hearing at other frequencies not included in this average.
2. Hearing thresholds in the contralateral ear of ≤25 dB HL
2. Between 3 years, 6 mos and 6 years, 6 mos of age at implantation.
3. Anatomically normal cochlear nerve
4. Cochlear anatomy that is amenable to cochlear implantation as evaluated by imaging (modality at the physician's discretion) including:
1. Normal cochlear anatomy or
2. Incomplete Partition Type II (IP2) with or without Enlarged Vestibular Aqueduct (EVA) or
3. EVA with normal partitioning
5. No evidence of progressive hearing loss.
6. Willing to undergo 4 week hearing aid trial as warranted based on achieving desired audibility when fitted via real ear desired sensation level (DSL) method.
7. Aided word recognition in the ear to be implanted of 30% or less as measured with Consonant Nucleus Consonant (CNC) words (50-word list)
1. When listening with an appropriately fit hearing aid and masking applied to the contralateral ear (Turner, 2004).
2. Aided testing will be conducted in a sound-proof booth with the participant seated 1 meter from the sound source, facing 0° azimuth. Recorded materials will be presented at 60 dB SPL.
3. The hearing aid output will be measured using DSL targets.
8. Realistic parental expectations: a verbal acknowledgement of the potential benefits and risks, and postoperative variation in performance. For instance, cochlear implantation will not restore normal hearing.
9. Willing to obtain recommended meningitis vaccinations per CDC recommendations.
(9) Development and cognition within the normal range as measured by the Leiter-R test of nonverbal intelligence and cognitive abilities and the Bracken Basic Concept Scale -Revised.
(10) Parental commitment to study parameters including being able and willing to participate in evaluation schedule, involvement in prescribed therapy, and travel to investigational site and study-related activities.
Exclusion Criteria
1. Speech perception materials are presented in English
2. Parental questionnaires are administered in English
2. Conductive hearing loss in either ear
3. Compromised auditory nerve
4. Ossification of the cochlea
5. Inability to participate in follow-up procedures (i.e., unwillingness, geographic location)
6. History of condition that contraindicates middle or inner ear surgery or anesthesia (i.e. otitis media refractory to treatment)
7. Case of sudden sensorineural hearing loss that has not been first evaluated by a physician
42 Months
78 Months
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Med-El Corporation
INDUSTRY
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin D Brown, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T. Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Jan;32(1):39-47. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181fcf271.
Firszt JB, Holden LK, Reeder RM, Waltzman SB, Arndt S. Auditory abilities after cochlear implantation in adults with unilateral deafness: a pilot study. Otol Neurotol. 2012 Oct;33(8):1339-46. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318268d52d.
Bess FH, Tharpe AM, Gibler AM. Auditory performance of children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear. 1986 Feb;7(1):20-6. doi: 10.1097/00003446-198602000-00005.
Arndt S, Prosse S, Laszig R, Wesarg T, Aschendorff A, Hassepass F. Cochlear implantation in children with single-sided deafness: does aetiology and duration of deafness matter? Audiol Neurootol. 2015;20 Suppl 1:21-30. doi: 10.1159/000380744. Epub 2015 May 19.
Kompis M, Pfiffner F, Krebs M, Caversaccio MD. Factors influencing the decision for Baha in unilateral deafness: the Bern benefit in single-sided deafness questionnaire. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. 2011;71:103-111. doi: 10.1159/000323591. Epub 2011 Mar 8.
Varni JW, Limbers CA, Burwinkle TM. Impaired health-related quality of life in children and adolescents with chronic conditions: a comparative analysis of 10 disease clusters and 33 disease categories/severities utilizing the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jul 16;5:43. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-43.
PETERSON GE, LEHISTE I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62. No abstract available.
Galvin KL, Noble W. Adaptation of the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale for use with children, parents, and teachers. Cochlear Implants Int. 2013 Jun;14(3):135-41. doi: 10.1179/1754762812Y.0000000014.
Park LR, Dillon MT, Buss E, Brown KD. Two-Year Outcomes of Cochlear Implant Use for Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss: Benefits and Comparison to Children With Normal Hearing. Ear Hear. 2023 Sep-Oct 01;44(5):955-968. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001353. Epub 2023 Mar 7.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
15-3350
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.